Cargando…

Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers

BACKGROUND: To evaluate NHS England London region’s approach to the revalidation appraisal of responsible officers in London, exploring perceptions of the quality and impact of the appraisal process. Revalidation is the process which aims to ensure doctors in the UK are up-to-date and fit to practic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griffin, Ann, Furmedge, Daniel S., Gill, Deborah, O’Keeffe, Catherine, Verma, Anju, Smith, Laura-Jane, Noble, Lorraine, Field, Ray, Ingham Clark, Celia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0438-7
_version_ 1782391085639663616
author Griffin, Ann
Furmedge, Daniel S.
Gill, Deborah
O’Keeffe, Catherine
Verma, Anju
Smith, Laura-Jane
Noble, Lorraine
Field, Ray
Ingham Clark, Celia
author_facet Griffin, Ann
Furmedge, Daniel S.
Gill, Deborah
O’Keeffe, Catherine
Verma, Anju
Smith, Laura-Jane
Noble, Lorraine
Field, Ray
Ingham Clark, Celia
author_sort Griffin, Ann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate NHS England London region’s approach to the revalidation appraisal of responsible officers in London, exploring perceptions of the quality and impact of the appraisal process. Revalidation is the process which aims to ensure doctors in the UK are up-to-date and fit to practice medicine thus improving the quality of patient care. Revalidation recommendations are largely premised on the documentation included in annual appraisals, which includes the professional development a doctor has undertaken and supporting information about their practice. METHODS: A pan-London qualitative study exploring the views of responsible officers and their appraisers about the revalidation appraisal process. The study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences and perceptions of the participants. Responsible officers were purposefully sampled to represent the broadest range of designated bodies. Data analysis generated themes pertaining to quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation with the potential to feed into and shape the evolving system under investigation. RESULTS: The central importance of highly skilled appraisers was highlighted. Both groups reported educational opportunities embedded within the appraisal process. Independent appraisers, not matched by clinical speciality or place of work, were considered to take a more objective view of a responsible officer’s practice by providing an ‘outsider perspective’. However, covering the breadth of roles, in sufficient depth, was challenging. Participants reported a bias favouring the appraisal of the responsible officer role above others including clinical work. Appraisal and revalidation was perceived to have the potential to improve the healthcare standards and support both personal development and institutional quality improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Responsible officers play a central role in the revalidation process. Getting responsible officer appraisal right is central to supporting those individuals to in turn support doctors and healthcare organisations in continuous quality improvement. The complexity and importance of the role of responsible officer may make achieving an appraisal of all roles of such individuals problematic. This evaluation suggests responsible officer appraisal was perceived as educational and effective.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4578248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45782482015-09-23 Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers Griffin, Ann Furmedge, Daniel S. Gill, Deborah O’Keeffe, Catherine Verma, Anju Smith, Laura-Jane Noble, Lorraine Field, Ray Ingham Clark, Celia BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate NHS England London region’s approach to the revalidation appraisal of responsible officers in London, exploring perceptions of the quality and impact of the appraisal process. Revalidation is the process which aims to ensure doctors in the UK are up-to-date and fit to practice medicine thus improving the quality of patient care. Revalidation recommendations are largely premised on the documentation included in annual appraisals, which includes the professional development a doctor has undertaken and supporting information about their practice. METHODS: A pan-London qualitative study exploring the views of responsible officers and their appraisers about the revalidation appraisal process. The study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences and perceptions of the participants. Responsible officers were purposefully sampled to represent the broadest range of designated bodies. Data analysis generated themes pertaining to quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation with the potential to feed into and shape the evolving system under investigation. RESULTS: The central importance of highly skilled appraisers was highlighted. Both groups reported educational opportunities embedded within the appraisal process. Independent appraisers, not matched by clinical speciality or place of work, were considered to take a more objective view of a responsible officer’s practice by providing an ‘outsider perspective’. However, covering the breadth of roles, in sufficient depth, was challenging. Participants reported a bias favouring the appraisal of the responsible officer role above others including clinical work. Appraisal and revalidation was perceived to have the potential to improve the healthcare standards and support both personal development and institutional quality improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Responsible officers play a central role in the revalidation process. Getting responsible officer appraisal right is central to supporting those individuals to in turn support doctors and healthcare organisations in continuous quality improvement. The complexity and importance of the role of responsible officer may make achieving an appraisal of all roles of such individuals problematic. This evaluation suggests responsible officer appraisal was perceived as educational and effective. BioMed Central 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4578248/ /pubmed/26392086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0438-7 Text en © Griffin et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Griffin, Ann
Furmedge, Daniel S.
Gill, Deborah
O’Keeffe, Catherine
Verma, Anju
Smith, Laura-Jane
Noble, Lorraine
Field, Ray
Ingham Clark, Celia
Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
title Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
title_full Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
title_fullStr Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
title_full_unstemmed Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
title_short Quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of London’s responsible officers and their appraisers
title_sort quality and impact of appraisal for revalidation: the perceptions of london’s responsible officers and their appraisers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26392086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0438-7
work_keys_str_mv AT griffinann qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT furmedgedaniels qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT gilldeborah qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT okeeffecatherine qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT vermaanju qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT smithlaurajane qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT noblelorraine qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT fieldray qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers
AT inghamclarkcelia qualityandimpactofappraisalforrevalidationtheperceptionsoflondonsresponsibleofficersandtheirappraisers