Cargando…

PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots

BACKGROUND: Modeling protein–protein interactions (PPIs) using docking algorithms is useful for understanding biomolecular interactions and mechanisms. Typically, a docking algorithm generates a large number of docking poses, and it is often challenging to select the best native-like pose. A further...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sukhwal, Anshul, Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448684
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S25928
_version_ 1782391135903154176
author Sukhwal, Anshul
Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
author_facet Sukhwal, Anshul
Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
author_sort Sukhwal, Anshul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Modeling protein–protein interactions (PPIs) using docking algorithms is useful for understanding biomolecular interactions and mechanisms. Typically, a docking algorithm generates a large number of docking poses, and it is often challenging to select the best native-like pose. A further challenge is to recognize key residues, termed as hotspots, at protein–protein interfaces, which contribute more in stabilizing a protein–protein interface. RESULTS: We had earlier developed a computer algorithm, called PPCheck, which ascribes pseudoenergies to measure the strength of PPIs. Native-like poses could be successfully identified in 27 out of 30 test cases, when applied on a separate set of decoys that were generated using FRODOCK. PPCheck, along with conservation and accessibility scores, was able to differentiate ‘native-like and non-native-like poses from 1883 decoys of Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions (CAPRI) targets with an accuracy of 60%. PPCheck was trained on a 10-fold mixed dataset and tested on a 10-fold mixed test set for hotspot prediction. We obtain an accuracy of 72%, which is in par with other methods, and a sensitivity of 59%, which is better than most existing methods available for hotspot prediction that uses similar datasets. Other relevant tests suggest that PPCheck can also be reliably used to identify conserved residues in a protein and to perform computational alanine scanning. CONCLUSIONS: PPCheck webserver can be successfully used to differentiate native-like and non-native-like docking poses, as generated by docking algorithms. The webserver can also be a convenient platform for calculating residue conservation, for performing computational alanine scanning, and for predicting protein–protein interface hotspots. While PPCheck can differentiate the generated decoys into native-like and non-native-like decoys with a fairly good accuracy, the results improve dramatically when features like conservation and accessibility are included. The method can be successfully used in ranking/scoring the decoys, as obtained from docking algorithms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4578551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45785512015-10-07 PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots Sukhwal, Anshul Sowdhamini, Ramanathan Bioinform Biol Insights Original Research BACKGROUND: Modeling protein–protein interactions (PPIs) using docking algorithms is useful for understanding biomolecular interactions and mechanisms. Typically, a docking algorithm generates a large number of docking poses, and it is often challenging to select the best native-like pose. A further challenge is to recognize key residues, termed as hotspots, at protein–protein interfaces, which contribute more in stabilizing a protein–protein interface. RESULTS: We had earlier developed a computer algorithm, called PPCheck, which ascribes pseudoenergies to measure the strength of PPIs. Native-like poses could be successfully identified in 27 out of 30 test cases, when applied on a separate set of decoys that were generated using FRODOCK. PPCheck, along with conservation and accessibility scores, was able to differentiate ‘native-like and non-native-like poses from 1883 decoys of Critical Assessment of Prediction of Interactions (CAPRI) targets with an accuracy of 60%. PPCheck was trained on a 10-fold mixed dataset and tested on a 10-fold mixed test set for hotspot prediction. We obtain an accuracy of 72%, which is in par with other methods, and a sensitivity of 59%, which is better than most existing methods available for hotspot prediction that uses similar datasets. Other relevant tests suggest that PPCheck can also be reliably used to identify conserved residues in a protein and to perform computational alanine scanning. CONCLUSIONS: PPCheck webserver can be successfully used to differentiate native-like and non-native-like docking poses, as generated by docking algorithms. The webserver can also be a convenient platform for calculating residue conservation, for performing computational alanine scanning, and for predicting protein–protein interface hotspots. While PPCheck can differentiate the generated decoys into native-like and non-native-like decoys with a fairly good accuracy, the results improve dramatically when features like conservation and accessibility are included. The method can be successfully used in ranking/scoring the decoys, as obtained from docking algorithms. Libertas Academica 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4578551/ /pubmed/26448684 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S25928 Text en © 2015 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sukhwal, Anshul
Sowdhamini, Ramanathan
PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots
title PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots
title_full PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots
title_fullStr PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots
title_full_unstemmed PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots
title_short PPCheck: A Webserver for the Quantitative Analysis of Protein–Protein Interfaces and Prediction of Residue Hotspots
title_sort ppcheck: a webserver for the quantitative analysis of protein–protein interfaces and prediction of residue hotspots
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26448684
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BBI.S25928
work_keys_str_mv AT sukhwalanshul ppcheckawebserverforthequantitativeanalysisofproteinproteininterfacesandpredictionofresiduehotspots
AT sowdhaminiramanathan ppcheckawebserverforthequantitativeanalysisofproteinproteininterfacesandpredictionofresiduehotspots