Cargando…
Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: So far, clinical studies in primary progressive MS (PPMS) have failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints. To some extent this might be attributable to the choice of assessments or to the selection of the study population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify outcome inf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26393519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138243 |
_version_ | 1782391177830465536 |
---|---|
author | Ziemssen, T. Rauer, S. Stadelmann, C. Henze, T. Koehler, J. Penner, I.-K. Lang, M. Poehlau, D. Baier-Ebert, M. Schieb, H. Meuth, S. |
author_facet | Ziemssen, T. Rauer, S. Stadelmann, C. Henze, T. Koehler, J. Penner, I.-K. Lang, M. Poehlau, D. Baier-Ebert, M. Schieb, H. Meuth, S. |
author_sort | Ziemssen, T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: So far, clinical studies in primary progressive MS (PPMS) have failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints. To some extent this might be attributable to the choice of assessments or to the selection of the study population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify outcome influencing factors by analyzing the design and methods of previous randomized studies in PPMS patients without restriction to intervention or comparator. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and the COCHRANE Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to February 2015). Keywords included PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Randomized, controlled trials of at least one year’s duration were selected if they included only patients with PPMS or if they reported sufficient PPMS subgroup data. No restrictions with respect to intervention or comparator were applied. Study quality was assessed by a biometrics expert. Relevant baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted and compared. RESULTS: Of 52 PPMS studies identified, four were selected. Inclusion criteria were notably different among studies with respect to both the definition of PPMS and the requirements for the presence of disability progression at enrolment. Differences between the study populations included the baseline lesion load, pretreatment status and disease duration. The rate of disease progression may also be an important factor, as all but one of the studies included a large proportion of patients with a low progression rate. In addition, the endpoints specified could not detect progression adequately. CONCLUSION: Optimal PPMS study methods involve appropriate patient selection, especially regarding the PPMS phenotype and progression rate. Functional composite endpoints might be more sensitive than single endpoints in capturing progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4578855 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45788552015-10-01 Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Ziemssen, T. Rauer, S. Stadelmann, C. Henze, T. Koehler, J. Penner, I.-K. Lang, M. Poehlau, D. Baier-Ebert, M. Schieb, H. Meuth, S. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: So far, clinical studies in primary progressive MS (PPMS) have failed to meet their primary efficacy endpoints. To some extent this might be attributable to the choice of assessments or to the selection of the study population. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify outcome influencing factors by analyzing the design and methods of previous randomized studies in PPMS patients without restriction to intervention or comparator. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS and the COCHRANE Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception to February 2015). Keywords included PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Randomized, controlled trials of at least one year’s duration were selected if they included only patients with PPMS or if they reported sufficient PPMS subgroup data. No restrictions with respect to intervention or comparator were applied. Study quality was assessed by a biometrics expert. Relevant baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted and compared. RESULTS: Of 52 PPMS studies identified, four were selected. Inclusion criteria were notably different among studies with respect to both the definition of PPMS and the requirements for the presence of disability progression at enrolment. Differences between the study populations included the baseline lesion load, pretreatment status and disease duration. The rate of disease progression may also be an important factor, as all but one of the studies included a large proportion of patients with a low progression rate. In addition, the endpoints specified could not detect progression adequately. CONCLUSION: Optimal PPMS study methods involve appropriate patient selection, especially regarding the PPMS phenotype and progression rate. Functional composite endpoints might be more sensitive than single endpoints in capturing progression. Public Library of Science 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4578855/ /pubmed/26393519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138243 Text en © 2015 Ziemssen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ziemssen, T. Rauer, S. Stadelmann, C. Henze, T. Koehler, J. Penner, I.-K. Lang, M. Poehlau, D. Baier-Ebert, M. Schieb, H. Meuth, S. Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review |
title | Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Evaluation of Study and Patient Characteristics of Clinical Studies in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | evaluation of study and patient characteristics of clinical studies in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578855/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26393519 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ziemssent evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT rauers evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT stadelmannc evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT henzet evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT koehlerj evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT pennerik evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT langm evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT poehlaud evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT baierebertm evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT schiebh evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview AT meuths evaluationofstudyandpatientcharacteristicsofclinicalstudiesinprimaryprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreview |