Cargando…

Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation

The 137 ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) of Saccharomyces provide a model for gene coregulation. We examined the positional and functional organization of their regulators (Rap1 [repressor activator protein 1], Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1), the transcription machinery (TFIIB, TFIID, and RNA polymerase...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reja, Rohit, Vinayachandran, Vinesh, Ghosh, Sujana, Pugh, B. Franklin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.268896.115
_version_ 1782391253783019520
author Reja, Rohit
Vinayachandran, Vinesh
Ghosh, Sujana
Pugh, B. Franklin
author_facet Reja, Rohit
Vinayachandran, Vinesh
Ghosh, Sujana
Pugh, B. Franklin
author_sort Reja, Rohit
collection PubMed
description The 137 ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) of Saccharomyces provide a model for gene coregulation. We examined the positional and functional organization of their regulators (Rap1 [repressor activator protein 1], Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1), the transcription machinery (TFIIB, TFIID, and RNA polymerase II), and chromatin at near-base-pair resolution using ChIP-exo, as RPGs are coordinately reprogrammed. Where Hmo1 is enriched, Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1 cross-linked broadly to promoter DNA in an RPG-specific manner and demarcated by general minor groove widening. Importantly, Hmo1 extended 20–50 base pairs (bp) downstream from Fhl1. Upon RPG repression, Fhl1 remained in place. Hmo1 dissociated, which was coupled to an upstream shift of the +1 nucleosome, as reflected by the Hmo1 extension and core promoter region. Fhl1 and Hmo1 may create two regulatable and positionally distinct barriers, against which chromatin remodelers position the +1 nucleosome into either an activating or a repressive state. Consistent with in vitro studies, we found that specific TFIID subunits, in addition to cross-linking at the core promoter, made precise cross-links at Rap1 sites, which we interpret to reflect native Rap1–TFIID interactions. Our findings suggest how sequence-specific DNA binding regulates nucleosome positioning and transcription complex assembly >300 bp away and how coregulation coevolved with coding sequences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4579351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45793512015-09-29 Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation Reja, Rohit Vinayachandran, Vinesh Ghosh, Sujana Pugh, B. Franklin Genes Dev Research Paper The 137 ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) of Saccharomyces provide a model for gene coregulation. We examined the positional and functional organization of their regulators (Rap1 [repressor activator protein 1], Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1), the transcription machinery (TFIIB, TFIID, and RNA polymerase II), and chromatin at near-base-pair resolution using ChIP-exo, as RPGs are coordinately reprogrammed. Where Hmo1 is enriched, Fhl1, Ifh1, Sfp1, and Hmo1 cross-linked broadly to promoter DNA in an RPG-specific manner and demarcated by general minor groove widening. Importantly, Hmo1 extended 20–50 base pairs (bp) downstream from Fhl1. Upon RPG repression, Fhl1 remained in place. Hmo1 dissociated, which was coupled to an upstream shift of the +1 nucleosome, as reflected by the Hmo1 extension and core promoter region. Fhl1 and Hmo1 may create two regulatable and positionally distinct barriers, against which chromatin remodelers position the +1 nucleosome into either an activating or a repressive state. Consistent with in vitro studies, we found that specific TFIID subunits, in addition to cross-linking at the core promoter, made precise cross-links at Rap1 sites, which we interpret to reflect native Rap1–TFIID interactions. Our findings suggest how sequence-specific DNA binding regulates nucleosome positioning and transcription complex assembly >300 bp away and how coregulation coevolved with coding sequences. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 2015-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4579351/ /pubmed/26385964 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.268896.115 Text en © 2015 Reja et al.; Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article, published in Genes & Development, is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Reja, Rohit
Vinayachandran, Vinesh
Ghosh, Sujana
Pugh, B. Franklin
Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
title Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
title_full Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
title_fullStr Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
title_full_unstemmed Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
title_short Molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
title_sort molecular mechanisms of ribosomal protein gene coregulation
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385964
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.268896.115
work_keys_str_mv AT rejarohit molecularmechanismsofribosomalproteingenecoregulation
AT vinayachandranvinesh molecularmechanismsofribosomalproteingenecoregulation
AT ghoshsujana molecularmechanismsofribosomalproteingenecoregulation
AT pughbfranklin molecularmechanismsofribosomalproteingenecoregulation