Cargando…

Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses

The neural mechanisms of the powerful analgesia induced by touching a painful body part are controversial. A long tradition of neurophysiologic studies in anaesthetized spinal animals indicate that touch can gate nociceptive input at spinal level. In contrast, recent studies in awake humans have sug...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mancini, Flavia, Beaumont, Anne-Lise, Hu, Li, Haggard, Patrick, Iannetti, Gian Domenico D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000253
_version_ 1782391275383685120
author Mancini, Flavia
Beaumont, Anne-Lise
Hu, Li
Haggard, Patrick
Iannetti, Gian Domenico D.
author_facet Mancini, Flavia
Beaumont, Anne-Lise
Hu, Li
Haggard, Patrick
Iannetti, Gian Domenico D.
author_sort Mancini, Flavia
collection PubMed
description The neural mechanisms of the powerful analgesia induced by touching a painful body part are controversial. A long tradition of neurophysiologic studies in anaesthetized spinal animals indicate that touch can gate nociceptive input at spinal level. In contrast, recent studies in awake humans have suggested that supraspinal mechanisms can be sufficient to drive touch-induced analgesia. To investigate this issue, we evaluated the modulation exerted by touch on established electrophysiologic markers of nociceptive function at both subcortical and cortical levels in humans. Aδ and C skin nociceptors were selectively activated by high-power laser pulses. As markers of subcortical and cortical function, we recorded the laser blink reflex, which is generated by brainstem circuits before the arrival of nociceptive signals at the cortex, and laser-evoked potentials, which reflect neural activity of a wide array of cortical areas. If subcortical nociceptive responses are inhibited by concomitant touch, supraspinal mechanisms alone are unlikely to be sufficient to drive touch-induced analgesia. Touch induced a clear analgesic effect, suppressed the laser blink reflex, and inhibited both Aδ-fibre and C-fibre laser-evoked potentials. Thus, we conclude that touch-induced analgesia is likely to be mediated by a subcortical gating of the ascending nociceptive input, which in turn results in a modulation of cortical responses. Hence, supraspinal mechanisms alone are not sufficient to mediate touch-induced analgesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4579551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45795512016-03-19 Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses Mancini, Flavia Beaumont, Anne-Lise Hu, Li Haggard, Patrick Iannetti, Gian Domenico D. Pain Research Paper The neural mechanisms of the powerful analgesia induced by touching a painful body part are controversial. A long tradition of neurophysiologic studies in anaesthetized spinal animals indicate that touch can gate nociceptive input at spinal level. In contrast, recent studies in awake humans have suggested that supraspinal mechanisms can be sufficient to drive touch-induced analgesia. To investigate this issue, we evaluated the modulation exerted by touch on established electrophysiologic markers of nociceptive function at both subcortical and cortical levels in humans. Aδ and C skin nociceptors were selectively activated by high-power laser pulses. As markers of subcortical and cortical function, we recorded the laser blink reflex, which is generated by brainstem circuits before the arrival of nociceptive signals at the cortex, and laser-evoked potentials, which reflect neural activity of a wide array of cortical areas. If subcortical nociceptive responses are inhibited by concomitant touch, supraspinal mechanisms alone are unlikely to be sufficient to drive touch-induced analgesia. Touch induced a clear analgesic effect, suppressed the laser blink reflex, and inhibited both Aδ-fibre and C-fibre laser-evoked potentials. Thus, we conclude that touch-induced analgesia is likely to be mediated by a subcortical gating of the ascending nociceptive input, which in turn results in a modulation of cortical responses. Hence, supraspinal mechanisms alone are not sufficient to mediate touch-induced analgesia. Wolters Kluwer 2015-06-03 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4579551/ /pubmed/26058037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000253 Text en © 2015 International Association for the Study of Pain This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mancini, Flavia
Beaumont, Anne-Lise
Hu, Li
Haggard, Patrick
Iannetti, Gian Domenico D.
Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
title Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
title_full Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
title_fullStr Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
title_full_unstemmed Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
title_short Touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
title_sort touch inhibits subcortical and cortical nociceptive responses
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058037
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000253
work_keys_str_mv AT manciniflavia touchinhibitssubcorticalandcorticalnociceptiveresponses
AT beaumontannelise touchinhibitssubcorticalandcorticalnociceptiveresponses
AT huli touchinhibitssubcorticalandcorticalnociceptiveresponses
AT haggardpatrick touchinhibitssubcorticalandcorticalnociceptiveresponses
AT iannettigiandomenicod touchinhibitssubcorticalandcorticalnociceptiveresponses