Cargando…

Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy

AIM: This study was aimed at standardizing the “In-House fatty meal” methodology in cholescintigraphy and to determine gall bladder ejection fraction (GBEF) with this standardized meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case–control study where 61 patients having right upper quadrant pain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jain, Avani S., Simon, Shelley, Muthukrishnan, Indirani, Mohan, A. T., Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430312
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.164021
_version_ 1782391286497542144
author Jain, Avani S.
Simon, Shelley
Muthukrishnan, Indirani
Mohan, A. T.
Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan
author_facet Jain, Avani S.
Simon, Shelley
Muthukrishnan, Indirani
Mohan, A. T.
Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan
author_sort Jain, Avani S.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was aimed at standardizing the “In-House fatty meal” methodology in cholescintigraphy and to determine gall bladder ejection fraction (GBEF) with this standardized meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case–control study where 61 patients having right upper quadrant pain and postprandial bloating and 59 healthy volunteers were included. They underwent (99m)Tc-mebrofenin fatty meal cholescintigraphy following a standard protocol. Dynamic acquisitions over 120 min were done, with a fatty meal being given between 45- and 60-min. Gallbladder emptying kinetics was studied by assessing the time activity curves and calculation of GBEFs were made at 30-min, 45-min, and at 60-min and assessed. RESULTS: The GBEF at 30-min was 74.42% ± 8.26% (mean ± standard deviation), at 45-min was 82.61% ± 6.5%, and at 60-min was 89.37% ± 4.48% in the volunteer group. The lower limit of GBEF in volunteers at 30-min was 58%, 45-min was 69%, and at 60-min was 81%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that 30-min GBEF provided the best separation between healthy and diseased subjects with an area under curve of 0.952 (95% confidence interval = 0.914–0.989). The lower limit of GBEF at 30-min was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: An in-House standard fatty meal could be a reproducible alternative to cholecystokinin as it is well-tolerated. Based on ROC curve analysis, we propose that 30-min GBEF provides good separation between healthy and diseased people with this in-House fatty meal. Hence, dynamic acquisitions beyond 30-min postingestion of the fatty meal may not be warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4579613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45796132015-10-01 Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy Jain, Avani S. Simon, Shelley Muthukrishnan, Indirani Mohan, A. T. Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan Indian J Nucl Med Original Article AIM: This study was aimed at standardizing the “In-House fatty meal” methodology in cholescintigraphy and to determine gall bladder ejection fraction (GBEF) with this standardized meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case–control study where 61 patients having right upper quadrant pain and postprandial bloating and 59 healthy volunteers were included. They underwent (99m)Tc-mebrofenin fatty meal cholescintigraphy following a standard protocol. Dynamic acquisitions over 120 min were done, with a fatty meal being given between 45- and 60-min. Gallbladder emptying kinetics was studied by assessing the time activity curves and calculation of GBEFs were made at 30-min, 45-min, and at 60-min and assessed. RESULTS: The GBEF at 30-min was 74.42% ± 8.26% (mean ± standard deviation), at 45-min was 82.61% ± 6.5%, and at 60-min was 89.37% ± 4.48% in the volunteer group. The lower limit of GBEF in volunteers at 30-min was 58%, 45-min was 69%, and at 60-min was 81%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that 30-min GBEF provided the best separation between healthy and diseased subjects with an area under curve of 0.952 (95% confidence interval = 0.914–0.989). The lower limit of GBEF at 30-min was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: An in-House standard fatty meal could be a reproducible alternative to cholecystokinin as it is well-tolerated. Based on ROC curve analysis, we propose that 30-min GBEF provides good separation between healthy and diseased people with this in-House fatty meal. Hence, dynamic acquisitions beyond 30-min postingestion of the fatty meal may not be warranted. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4579613/ /pubmed/26430312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.164021 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms
spellingShingle Original Article
Jain, Avani S.
Simon, Shelley
Muthukrishnan, Indirani
Mohan, A. T.
Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan
Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
title Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
title_full Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
title_fullStr Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
title_full_unstemmed Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
title_short Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
title_sort standardization of “in-house fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430312
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.164021
work_keys_str_mv AT jainavanis standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy
AT simonshelley standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy
AT muthukrishnanindirani standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy
AT mohanat standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy
AT balsubramaniamramakrishnan standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy