Cargando…
Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy
AIM: This study was aimed at standardizing the “In-House fatty meal” methodology in cholescintigraphy and to determine gall bladder ejection fraction (GBEF) with this standardized meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case–control study where 61 patients having right upper quadrant pain...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.164021 |
_version_ | 1782391286497542144 |
---|---|
author | Jain, Avani S. Simon, Shelley Muthukrishnan, Indirani Mohan, A. T. Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan |
author_facet | Jain, Avani S. Simon, Shelley Muthukrishnan, Indirani Mohan, A. T. Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan |
author_sort | Jain, Avani S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study was aimed at standardizing the “In-House fatty meal” methodology in cholescintigraphy and to determine gall bladder ejection fraction (GBEF) with this standardized meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case–control study where 61 patients having right upper quadrant pain and postprandial bloating and 59 healthy volunteers were included. They underwent (99m)Tc-mebrofenin fatty meal cholescintigraphy following a standard protocol. Dynamic acquisitions over 120 min were done, with a fatty meal being given between 45- and 60-min. Gallbladder emptying kinetics was studied by assessing the time activity curves and calculation of GBEFs were made at 30-min, 45-min, and at 60-min and assessed. RESULTS: The GBEF at 30-min was 74.42% ± 8.26% (mean ± standard deviation), at 45-min was 82.61% ± 6.5%, and at 60-min was 89.37% ± 4.48% in the volunteer group. The lower limit of GBEF in volunteers at 30-min was 58%, 45-min was 69%, and at 60-min was 81%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that 30-min GBEF provided the best separation between healthy and diseased subjects with an area under curve of 0.952 (95% confidence interval = 0.914–0.989). The lower limit of GBEF at 30-min was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: An in-House standard fatty meal could be a reproducible alternative to cholecystokinin as it is well-tolerated. Based on ROC curve analysis, we propose that 30-min GBEF provides good separation between healthy and diseased people with this in-House fatty meal. Hence, dynamic acquisitions beyond 30-min postingestion of the fatty meal may not be warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4579613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45796132015-10-01 Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy Jain, Avani S. Simon, Shelley Muthukrishnan, Indirani Mohan, A. T. Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan Indian J Nucl Med Original Article AIM: This study was aimed at standardizing the “In-House fatty meal” methodology in cholescintigraphy and to determine gall bladder ejection fraction (GBEF) with this standardized meal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective case–control study where 61 patients having right upper quadrant pain and postprandial bloating and 59 healthy volunteers were included. They underwent (99m)Tc-mebrofenin fatty meal cholescintigraphy following a standard protocol. Dynamic acquisitions over 120 min were done, with a fatty meal being given between 45- and 60-min. Gallbladder emptying kinetics was studied by assessing the time activity curves and calculation of GBEFs were made at 30-min, 45-min, and at 60-min and assessed. RESULTS: The GBEF at 30-min was 74.42% ± 8.26% (mean ± standard deviation), at 45-min was 82.61% ± 6.5%, and at 60-min was 89.37% ± 4.48% in the volunteer group. The lower limit of GBEF in volunteers at 30-min was 58%, 45-min was 69%, and at 60-min was 81%. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that 30-min GBEF provided the best separation between healthy and diseased subjects with an area under curve of 0.952 (95% confidence interval = 0.914–0.989). The lower limit of GBEF at 30-min was 58%. CONCLUSIONS: An in-House standard fatty meal could be a reproducible alternative to cholecystokinin as it is well-tolerated. Based on ROC curve analysis, we propose that 30-min GBEF provides good separation between healthy and diseased people with this in-House fatty meal. Hence, dynamic acquisitions beyond 30-min postingestion of the fatty meal may not be warranted. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4579613/ /pubmed/26430312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.164021 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jain, Avani S. Simon, Shelley Muthukrishnan, Indirani Mohan, A. T. Balsubramaniam, Ramakrishnan Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
title | Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
title_full | Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
title_fullStr | Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
title_full_unstemmed | Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
title_short | Standardization of “In-House fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
title_sort | standardization of “in-house fatty meal” methodology for cholescintigraphy |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26430312 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-3919.164021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jainavanis standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy AT simonshelley standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy AT muthukrishnanindirani standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy AT mohanat standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy AT balsubramaniamramakrishnan standardizationofinhousefattymealmethodologyforcholescintigraphy |