Cargando…
Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography?
It is estimated that 3.4% of patients qualified for cholecystectomy due to cholelithiasis have a coexisting choledocholithiasis. For decades, endoscopic ascending retrograde cholangiopancreatography has been the golden diagnostic standard in cases of suspected choledocholithiasis. The method is asso...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medical Communications Sp. z o.o.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26672977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2014.0012 |
_version_ | 1782391301382078464 |
---|---|
author | Leszczyszyn, Jarosław |
author_facet | Leszczyszyn, Jarosław |
author_sort | Leszczyszyn, Jarosław |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is estimated that 3.4% of patients qualified for cholecystectomy due to cholelithiasis have a coexisting choledocholithiasis. For decades, endoscopic ascending retrograde cholangiopancreatography has been the golden diagnostic standard in cases of suspected choledocholithiasis. The method is associated with a relatively high rate of complications, including acute pancreatitis, the incidence of which is estimated to range between 0.74% and 1.86%. The mechanism of this ERCP-induced complication is not fully understood, although factors increasing the risk of acute pancreatitis, such as sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, previous acute pancreatitis, narrow bile ducts or difficult catheterization of Vater's ampulla are known. It has been suggested to discontinue the diagnostic endoscopic retrograde ascending cholangiopancreatography and replace it with endoscopic ultrasonography due to possible and potentially dangerous complications. Endoscopic ultrasonography has sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 95% regardless of gallstone diameter, as opposed to magnetic resonance cholangiography. However, both of these parameters depend on the experience of the performing physician. The use of endoscopic ultrasonography allows to limit the number of performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures by more than 2/3. Ascending endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with an endoscopic incision into the Vater's ampulla followed by a mechanical evacuation of stone deposits from the ducts still remains a golden standard in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Despite some limitations such as potentially increased treatment costs as well as the necessity of the procedure to be performed by a surgeon experienced in both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as well as endoscopic ultrasonography, the diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography followed by a simultaneous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography aimed at gallstone removal is the most efficient diagnostic and therapeutic management scheme in cases of suspected choledocholithiasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4579695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45796952015-12-15 Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? Leszczyszyn, Jarosław J Ultrason Review It is estimated that 3.4% of patients qualified for cholecystectomy due to cholelithiasis have a coexisting choledocholithiasis. For decades, endoscopic ascending retrograde cholangiopancreatography has been the golden diagnostic standard in cases of suspected choledocholithiasis. The method is associated with a relatively high rate of complications, including acute pancreatitis, the incidence of which is estimated to range between 0.74% and 1.86%. The mechanism of this ERCP-induced complication is not fully understood, although factors increasing the risk of acute pancreatitis, such as sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, previous acute pancreatitis, narrow bile ducts or difficult catheterization of Vater's ampulla are known. It has been suggested to discontinue the diagnostic endoscopic retrograde ascending cholangiopancreatography and replace it with endoscopic ultrasonography due to possible and potentially dangerous complications. Endoscopic ultrasonography has sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 95% regardless of gallstone diameter, as opposed to magnetic resonance cholangiography. However, both of these parameters depend on the experience of the performing physician. The use of endoscopic ultrasonography allows to limit the number of performed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures by more than 2/3. Ascending endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with an endoscopic incision into the Vater's ampulla followed by a mechanical evacuation of stone deposits from the ducts still remains a golden standard in the treatment of choledocholithiasis. Despite some limitations such as potentially increased treatment costs as well as the necessity of the procedure to be performed by a surgeon experienced in both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as well as endoscopic ultrasonography, the diagnostic endoscopic ultrasonography followed by a simultaneous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography aimed at gallstone removal is the most efficient diagnostic and therapeutic management scheme in cases of suspected choledocholithiasis. Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2014-06-30 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4579695/ /pubmed/26672977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2014.0012 Text en 2014 Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Leszczyszyn, Jarosław Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
title | Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
title_full | Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
title_fullStr | Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
title_full_unstemmed | Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
title_short | Choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
title_sort | choledocholithiasis diagnostics – endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4579695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26672977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2014.0012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leszczyszynjarosław choledocholithiasisdiagnosticsendoscopicultrasoundorendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatography |