Cargando…

Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy

BACKGROUND: Gambian sleeping sickness (human African trypanosomiasis, HAT) outbreaks are brought under control by case detection and treatment although it is recognised that this typically only reaches about 75% of the population. Vector control is capable of completely interrupting HAT transmission...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tirados, Inaki, Esterhuizen, Johan, Kovacic, Vanja, Mangwiro, T. N. Clement, Vale, Glyn A., Hastings, Ian, Solano, Philippe, Lehane, Michael J., Torr, Steve J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003822
_version_ 1782391427947298816
author Tirados, Inaki
Esterhuizen, Johan
Kovacic, Vanja
Mangwiro, T. N. Clement
Vale, Glyn A.
Hastings, Ian
Solano, Philippe
Lehane, Michael J.
Torr, Steve J.
author_facet Tirados, Inaki
Esterhuizen, Johan
Kovacic, Vanja
Mangwiro, T. N. Clement
Vale, Glyn A.
Hastings, Ian
Solano, Philippe
Lehane, Michael J.
Torr, Steve J.
author_sort Tirados, Inaki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gambian sleeping sickness (human African trypanosomiasis, HAT) outbreaks are brought under control by case detection and treatment although it is recognised that this typically only reaches about 75% of the population. Vector control is capable of completely interrupting HAT transmission but is not used because it is considered too expensive and difficult to organise in resource-poor settings. We conducted a full scale field trial of a refined vector control technology to determine its utility in control of Gambian HAT. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The major vector of Gambian HAT is the tsetse fly Glossina fuscipes which lives in the humid zone immediately adjacent to water bodies. From a series of preliminary trials we determined the number of tiny targets required to reduce G. fuscipes populations by more than 90%. Using these data for model calibration we predicted we needed a target density of 20 per linear km of river in riverine savannah to achieve >90% tsetse control. We then carried out a full scale, 500 km(2) field trial covering two HAT foci in Northern Uganda to determine the efficacy of tiny targets (overall target density 5.7/km(2)). In 12 months, tsetse populations declined by more than 90%. As a guide we used a published HAT transmission model and calculated that a 72% reduction in tsetse population is required to stop transmission in those settings. INTERPRETATION: The Ugandan census suggests population density in the HAT foci is approximately 500 per km(2). The estimated cost for a single round of active case detection (excluding treatment), covering 80% of the population, is US$433,333 (WHO figures). One year of vector control organised within the country, which can completely stop HAT transmission, would cost US$42,700. The case for adding this method of vector control to case detection and treatment is strong. We outline how such a component could be organised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4580652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45806522015-10-01 Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy Tirados, Inaki Esterhuizen, Johan Kovacic, Vanja Mangwiro, T. N. Clement Vale, Glyn A. Hastings, Ian Solano, Philippe Lehane, Michael J. Torr, Steve J. PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Gambian sleeping sickness (human African trypanosomiasis, HAT) outbreaks are brought under control by case detection and treatment although it is recognised that this typically only reaches about 75% of the population. Vector control is capable of completely interrupting HAT transmission but is not used because it is considered too expensive and difficult to organise in resource-poor settings. We conducted a full scale field trial of a refined vector control technology to determine its utility in control of Gambian HAT. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The major vector of Gambian HAT is the tsetse fly Glossina fuscipes which lives in the humid zone immediately adjacent to water bodies. From a series of preliminary trials we determined the number of tiny targets required to reduce G. fuscipes populations by more than 90%. Using these data for model calibration we predicted we needed a target density of 20 per linear km of river in riverine savannah to achieve >90% tsetse control. We then carried out a full scale, 500 km(2) field trial covering two HAT foci in Northern Uganda to determine the efficacy of tiny targets (overall target density 5.7/km(2)). In 12 months, tsetse populations declined by more than 90%. As a guide we used a published HAT transmission model and calculated that a 72% reduction in tsetse population is required to stop transmission in those settings. INTERPRETATION: The Ugandan census suggests population density in the HAT foci is approximately 500 per km(2). The estimated cost for a single round of active case detection (excluding treatment), covering 80% of the population, is US$433,333 (WHO figures). One year of vector control organised within the country, which can completely stop HAT transmission, would cost US$42,700. The case for adding this method of vector control to case detection and treatment is strong. We outline how such a component could be organised. Public Library of Science 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4580652/ /pubmed/26267814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003822 Text en © 2015 Tirados et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tirados, Inaki
Esterhuizen, Johan
Kovacic, Vanja
Mangwiro, T. N. Clement
Vale, Glyn A.
Hastings, Ian
Solano, Philippe
Lehane, Michael J.
Torr, Steve J.
Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy
title Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy
title_full Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy
title_fullStr Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy
title_full_unstemmed Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy
title_short Tsetse Control and Gambian Sleeping Sickness; Implications for Control Strategy
title_sort tsetse control and gambian sleeping sickness; implications for control strategy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26267814
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0003822
work_keys_str_mv AT tiradosinaki tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT esterhuizenjohan tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT kovacicvanja tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT mangwirotnclement tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT valeglyna tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT hastingsian tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT solanophilippe tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT lehanemichaelj tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy
AT torrstevej tsetsecontrolandgambiansleepingsicknessimplicationsforcontrolstrategy