Cargando…

Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies of Enzalutamide

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral enzalutamide (160 mg once daily) is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This article describes the pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide and its active metabolite N-desmethyl enzalutamide. METHODS: Results are reported fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibbons, Jacqueline A., Ouatas, Taoufik, Krauwinkel, Walter, Ohtsu, Yoshiaki, van der Walt, Jan-Stefan, Beddo, Vanessa, de Vries, Michiel, Mordenti, Joyce
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4580721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40262-015-0271-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Oral enzalutamide (160 mg once daily) is approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This article describes the pharmacokinetics of enzalutamide and its active metabolite N-desmethyl enzalutamide. METHODS: Results are reported from five clinical studies. RESULTS: In a dose-escalation study (n = 140), enzalutamide half-life was 5.8 days, steady state was achieved by day 28, accumulation was 8.3-fold, exposure was approximately dose proportional from 30–360 mg/day, and intersubject variability was ≤30 %. In a mass balance study (n = 6), enzalutamide was primarily eliminated by hepatic metabolism. Renal excretion was an insignificant elimination pathway for enzalutamide and N-desmethyl enzalutamide. In a food-effect study (n = 60), food did not have a meaningful effect on area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) of enzalutamide or N-desmethyl enzalutamide, and in an hepatic impairment study, AUC of the sum of enzalutamide plus N-desmethyl enzalutamide was similar in men with mild (n = 6) or moderate (n = 8) impairment (Child–Pugh Class A and B) versus men with normal hepatic function (n = 14). In a phase III trial, an exposure-response analysis of steady-state predose (trough) concentrations (C(trough)) versus overall survival (n = 1103) showed that active treatment C(trough) quartiles for 160 mg/day were uniformly beneficial relative to placebo, and no threshold of C(trough) was associated with a statistically significant better response. CONCLUSIONS: Enzalutamide has predictable pharmacokinetics, with low intersubject variability. Similar efficacy was observed in patients across the concentration/exposure range associated with a fixed oral dose of enzalutamide 160 mg/day. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s40262-015-0271-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.