Cargando…

To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question

The fast-acting β-1 blocker esmolol has been the center of attention since the landmark article by Morrelli and colleagues suggesting that, in patients with sepsis, reducing heart rate by administering esmolol can result in a survival benefit. However, the use of esmolol for the treatment of sepsis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ince, Can
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26400614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1059-6
_version_ 1782391497053700096
author Ince, Can
author_facet Ince, Can
author_sort Ince, Can
collection PubMed
description The fast-acting β-1 blocker esmolol has been the center of attention since the landmark article by Morrelli and colleagues suggesting that, in patients with sepsis, reducing heart rate by administering esmolol can result in a survival benefit. However, the use of esmolol for the treatment of sepsis and the underlying mechanism responsible for this benefit remain controversial. This commentary discusses the study by Jacquet-Lagrèze and colleagues, who in a pig model of sepsis tested the hypothesis that administration of esmolol to reduce heart rate may correct sepsis-induced sublingual and gut microcirculatory alterations which are known to be associated with adverse outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4581102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45811022015-09-25 To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question Ince, Can Crit Care Commentary The fast-acting β-1 blocker esmolol has been the center of attention since the landmark article by Morrelli and colleagues suggesting that, in patients with sepsis, reducing heart rate by administering esmolol can result in a survival benefit. However, the use of esmolol for the treatment of sepsis and the underlying mechanism responsible for this benefit remain controversial. This commentary discusses the study by Jacquet-Lagrèze and colleagues, who in a pig model of sepsis tested the hypothesis that administration of esmolol to reduce heart rate may correct sepsis-induced sublingual and gut microcirculatory alterations which are known to be associated with adverse outcome. BioMed Central 2015-09-24 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4581102/ /pubmed/26400614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1059-6 Text en © Ince. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Ince, Can
To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
title To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
title_full To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
title_fullStr To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
title_full_unstemmed To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
title_short To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
title_sort to beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26400614
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1059-6
work_keys_str_mv AT incecan tobetablockornottobetablockthatisthequestion