Cargando…
To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question
The fast-acting β-1 blocker esmolol has been the center of attention since the landmark article by Morrelli and colleagues suggesting that, in patients with sepsis, reducing heart rate by administering esmolol can result in a survival benefit. However, the use of esmolol for the treatment of sepsis...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26400614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1059-6 |
_version_ | 1782391497053700096 |
---|---|
author | Ince, Can |
author_facet | Ince, Can |
author_sort | Ince, Can |
collection | PubMed |
description | The fast-acting β-1 blocker esmolol has been the center of attention since the landmark article by Morrelli and colleagues suggesting that, in patients with sepsis, reducing heart rate by administering esmolol can result in a survival benefit. However, the use of esmolol for the treatment of sepsis and the underlying mechanism responsible for this benefit remain controversial. This commentary discusses the study by Jacquet-Lagrèze and colleagues, who in a pig model of sepsis tested the hypothesis that administration of esmolol to reduce heart rate may correct sepsis-induced sublingual and gut microcirculatory alterations which are known to be associated with adverse outcome. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4581102 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45811022015-09-25 To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question Ince, Can Crit Care Commentary The fast-acting β-1 blocker esmolol has been the center of attention since the landmark article by Morrelli and colleagues suggesting that, in patients with sepsis, reducing heart rate by administering esmolol can result in a survival benefit. However, the use of esmolol for the treatment of sepsis and the underlying mechanism responsible for this benefit remain controversial. This commentary discusses the study by Jacquet-Lagrèze and colleagues, who in a pig model of sepsis tested the hypothesis that administration of esmolol to reduce heart rate may correct sepsis-induced sublingual and gut microcirculatory alterations which are known to be associated with adverse outcome. BioMed Central 2015-09-24 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4581102/ /pubmed/26400614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1059-6 Text en © Ince. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Ince, Can To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
title | To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
title_full | To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
title_fullStr | To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
title_full_unstemmed | To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
title_short | To beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
title_sort | to beta block or not to beta block; that is the question |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581102/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26400614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1059-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT incecan tobetablockornottobetablockthatisthequestion |