Cargando…
Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
BACKGROUND: In times of rapidly increasing numbers of immunological approaches entering the clinics, antigen delivery becomes a pivotal process. The genuine way of rendering antigen presenting cells (APC) antigen specific, largely influences the outcome of the immune response. Short peptides bear th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8 |
_version_ | 1782391571639959552 |
---|---|
author | Mullins, Christina Susanne Wegner, Tabea Klar, Ernst Classen, Carl-Friedrich Linnebacher, Michael |
author_facet | Mullins, Christina Susanne Wegner, Tabea Klar, Ernst Classen, Carl-Friedrich Linnebacher, Michael |
author_sort | Mullins, Christina Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In times of rapidly increasing numbers of immunological approaches entering the clinics, antigen delivery becomes a pivotal process. The genuine way of rendering antigen presenting cells (APC) antigen specific, largely influences the outcome of the immune response. Short peptides bear the demerit of HLA restriction, whereas the proper way of delivery for long peptide sequences is currently a matter of debate. Electroporation is a reliable method for antigen delivery, especially using nucleic acids. The nucleofection process is based on this approach with the twist of further ensuring delivery also into the nucleus. Beside the form of antigen, the type of APC used for immune response induction may be crucial. Dendritic cells (DC) are by far the most commonly used APC; however B cells have entered this field as well and have gained wide acceptance. RESULTS: In this study, we compared B cells to DC with regard to nucleofection efficiency and intensity of resulting antigen expression. APC were transfected either with plasmid DNA containing the reporter gene green fluorescent protein (GFP) or directly with in vitro-transcribed (IVT) GPF mRNA as a surrogate antigen. Out of nearly 100 different nucleofection programs tested, the top five for each cell type were identified and validated using cells from cancer patients. Flow cytometric analyses of transfected cells determining GFP expression and viability revealed a reverse correlation of efficiency and viability. Finally, donor dependant variances were analyzed. CONCLUSION: In summary, nucleofection of both DC and B cells is feasible with plasmid DNA and IVT mRNA. And no differences with regard to nucleofectability were observed between the two cell types. Using IVT mRNA omits the danger of genomic integration and plasmid DNA constructs permit a more potent and longer lasting antigen expression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4581479 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45814792015-09-25 Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells Mullins, Christina Susanne Wegner, Tabea Klar, Ernst Classen, Carl-Friedrich Linnebacher, Michael BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: In times of rapidly increasing numbers of immunological approaches entering the clinics, antigen delivery becomes a pivotal process. The genuine way of rendering antigen presenting cells (APC) antigen specific, largely influences the outcome of the immune response. Short peptides bear the demerit of HLA restriction, whereas the proper way of delivery for long peptide sequences is currently a matter of debate. Electroporation is a reliable method for antigen delivery, especially using nucleic acids. The nucleofection process is based on this approach with the twist of further ensuring delivery also into the nucleus. Beside the form of antigen, the type of APC used for immune response induction may be crucial. Dendritic cells (DC) are by far the most commonly used APC; however B cells have entered this field as well and have gained wide acceptance. RESULTS: In this study, we compared B cells to DC with regard to nucleofection efficiency and intensity of resulting antigen expression. APC were transfected either with plasmid DNA containing the reporter gene green fluorescent protein (GFP) or directly with in vitro-transcribed (IVT) GPF mRNA as a surrogate antigen. Out of nearly 100 different nucleofection programs tested, the top five for each cell type were identified and validated using cells from cancer patients. Flow cytometric analyses of transfected cells determining GFP expression and viability revealed a reverse correlation of efficiency and viability. Finally, donor dependant variances were analyzed. CONCLUSION: In summary, nucleofection of both DC and B cells is feasible with plasmid DNA and IVT mRNA. And no differences with regard to nucleofectability were observed between the two cell types. Using IVT mRNA omits the danger of genomic integration and plasmid DNA constructs permit a more potent and longer lasting antigen expression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4581479/ /pubmed/26404473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8 Text en © Mullins et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Mullins, Christina Susanne Wegner, Tabea Klar, Ernst Classen, Carl-Friedrich Linnebacher, Michael Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
title | Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
title_full | Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
title_fullStr | Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
title_short | Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
title_sort | optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581479/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mullinschristinasusanne optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells AT wegnertabea optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells AT klarernst optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells AT classencarlfriedrich optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells AT linnebachermichael optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells |