Cargando…

Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells

BACKGROUND: In times of rapidly increasing numbers of immunological approaches entering the clinics, antigen delivery becomes a pivotal process. The genuine way of rendering antigen presenting cells (APC) antigen specific, largely influences the outcome of the immune response. Short peptides bear th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mullins, Christina Susanne, Wegner, Tabea, Klar, Ernst, Classen, Carl-Friedrich, Linnebacher, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8
_version_ 1782391571639959552
author Mullins, Christina Susanne
Wegner, Tabea
Klar, Ernst
Classen, Carl-Friedrich
Linnebacher, Michael
author_facet Mullins, Christina Susanne
Wegner, Tabea
Klar, Ernst
Classen, Carl-Friedrich
Linnebacher, Michael
author_sort Mullins, Christina Susanne
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In times of rapidly increasing numbers of immunological approaches entering the clinics, antigen delivery becomes a pivotal process. The genuine way of rendering antigen presenting cells (APC) antigen specific, largely influences the outcome of the immune response. Short peptides bear the demerit of HLA restriction, whereas the proper way of delivery for long peptide sequences is currently a matter of debate. Electroporation is a reliable method for antigen delivery, especially using nucleic acids. The nucleofection process is based on this approach with the twist of further ensuring delivery also into the nucleus. Beside the form of antigen, the type of APC used for immune response induction may be crucial. Dendritic cells (DC) are by far the most commonly used APC; however B cells have entered this field as well and have gained wide acceptance. RESULTS: In this study, we compared B cells to DC with regard to nucleofection efficiency and intensity of resulting antigen expression. APC were transfected either with plasmid DNA containing the reporter gene green fluorescent protein (GFP) or directly with in vitro-transcribed (IVT) GPF mRNA as a surrogate antigen. Out of nearly 100 different nucleofection programs tested, the top five for each cell type were identified and validated using cells from cancer patients. Flow cytometric analyses of transfected cells determining GFP expression and viability revealed a reverse correlation of efficiency and viability. Finally, donor dependant variances were analyzed. CONCLUSION: In summary, nucleofection of both DC and B cells is feasible with plasmid DNA and IVT mRNA. And no differences with regard to nucleofectability were observed between the two cell types. Using IVT mRNA omits the danger of genomic integration and plasmid DNA constructs permit a more potent and longer lasting antigen expression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4581479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45814792015-09-25 Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells Mullins, Christina Susanne Wegner, Tabea Klar, Ernst Classen, Carl-Friedrich Linnebacher, Michael BMC Res Notes Technical Note BACKGROUND: In times of rapidly increasing numbers of immunological approaches entering the clinics, antigen delivery becomes a pivotal process. The genuine way of rendering antigen presenting cells (APC) antigen specific, largely influences the outcome of the immune response. Short peptides bear the demerit of HLA restriction, whereas the proper way of delivery for long peptide sequences is currently a matter of debate. Electroporation is a reliable method for antigen delivery, especially using nucleic acids. The nucleofection process is based on this approach with the twist of further ensuring delivery also into the nucleus. Beside the form of antigen, the type of APC used for immune response induction may be crucial. Dendritic cells (DC) are by far the most commonly used APC; however B cells have entered this field as well and have gained wide acceptance. RESULTS: In this study, we compared B cells to DC with regard to nucleofection efficiency and intensity of resulting antigen expression. APC were transfected either with plasmid DNA containing the reporter gene green fluorescent protein (GFP) or directly with in vitro-transcribed (IVT) GPF mRNA as a surrogate antigen. Out of nearly 100 different nucleofection programs tested, the top five for each cell type were identified and validated using cells from cancer patients. Flow cytometric analyses of transfected cells determining GFP expression and viability revealed a reverse correlation of efficiency and viability. Finally, donor dependant variances were analyzed. CONCLUSION: In summary, nucleofection of both DC and B cells is feasible with plasmid DNA and IVT mRNA. And no differences with regard to nucleofectability were observed between the two cell types. Using IVT mRNA omits the danger of genomic integration and plasmid DNA constructs permit a more potent and longer lasting antigen expression. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4581479/ /pubmed/26404473 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8 Text en © Mullins et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Note
Mullins, Christina Susanne
Wegner, Tabea
Klar, Ernst
Classen, Carl-Friedrich
Linnebacher, Michael
Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
title Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
title_full Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
title_fullStr Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
title_short Optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
title_sort optimizing the process of nucleofection for professional antigen presenting cells
topic Technical Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404473
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1446-8
work_keys_str_mv AT mullinschristinasusanne optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells
AT wegnertabea optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells
AT klarernst optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells
AT classencarlfriedrich optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells
AT linnebachermichael optimizingtheprocessofnucleofectionforprofessionalantigenpresentingcells