Cargando…

Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study

BACKGROUND: The initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study was a pregnancy and birth cohort study that sought to enroll some women prior to pregnancy, and to assess exposures early in pregnancy. METHODS: During the recruitment phase (2009–2010), geographically based sampling was u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanford, Joseph B., Brenner, Ruth, Fetterer, David, Palmer, Leslie, Schoendorf, Kenneth C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26399430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0067-1
_version_ 1782391578575241216
author Stanford, Joseph B.
Brenner, Ruth
Fetterer, David
Palmer, Leslie
Schoendorf, Kenneth C.
author_facet Stanford, Joseph B.
Brenner, Ruth
Fetterer, David
Palmer, Leslie
Schoendorf, Kenneth C.
author_sort Stanford, Joseph B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study was a pregnancy and birth cohort study that sought to enroll some women prior to pregnancy, and to assess exposures early in pregnancy. METHODS: During the recruitment phase (2009–2010), geographically based sampling was used to recruit women early in pregnancy and women not currently pregnant, not using contraception and heterosexually active. We assessed the following outcomes for women enrolled preconception and early in pregnancy: yield of births; demographic characteristics of births for different enrollment groups; time to pregnancy for preconception women; and the timing of study visits for exposure assessment. RESULTS: 1399 women were recruited into the initial vanguard cohort: 429 preconception (198 trying for pregnancy, and 231 not trying) and 970 already pregnant. There were 1135 pregnancies (81 % of women) and 922 newborns enrolled (81 % of pregnancies) through September 2012. Preconception women represented 30.6 % of women enrolled, and contributed 14.5 % of births. Among women who gave birth, and who had enrolled preconception trying for pregnancy, 67.3 % were white non-Hispanic, compared to 50.0 % of preconception women not trying for pregnancy, and 61.5 % of pregnant women. Women enrolled preconception who were trying for pregnancy had higher cumulative probability of pregnancy at one year compared to women not trying (adjusted 86 % versus 56 %). Of 165 women enrolled preconception who became pregnant, 19 % had a study visit within 30 days of conception. By 10.5 weeks after conception, 75 % of women enrolled preconception had completed a pregnancy study visit; for women enrolled pregnant, the 75 % threshold was reached at 28.4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There were demographic differences in births from women enrolled preconception trying for pregnancy, preconception not trying for pregnancy, or during pregnancy. Time to pregnancy was shorter for women actively trying for pregnancy. Most women enrolled preconception did not have exposure assessment within 30 days of conception, but they did have exposure assessment much earlier during pregnancy than women who enrolled during pregnancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4581516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45815162015-09-25 Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study Stanford, Joseph B. Brenner, Ruth Fetterer, David Palmer, Leslie Schoendorf, Kenneth C. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: The initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study was a pregnancy and birth cohort study that sought to enroll some women prior to pregnancy, and to assess exposures early in pregnancy. METHODS: During the recruitment phase (2009–2010), geographically based sampling was used to recruit women early in pregnancy and women not currently pregnant, not using contraception and heterosexually active. We assessed the following outcomes for women enrolled preconception and early in pregnancy: yield of births; demographic characteristics of births for different enrollment groups; time to pregnancy for preconception women; and the timing of study visits for exposure assessment. RESULTS: 1399 women were recruited into the initial vanguard cohort: 429 preconception (198 trying for pregnancy, and 231 not trying) and 970 already pregnant. There were 1135 pregnancies (81 % of women) and 922 newborns enrolled (81 % of pregnancies) through September 2012. Preconception women represented 30.6 % of women enrolled, and contributed 14.5 % of births. Among women who gave birth, and who had enrolled preconception trying for pregnancy, 67.3 % were white non-Hispanic, compared to 50.0 % of preconception women not trying for pregnancy, and 61.5 % of pregnant women. Women enrolled preconception who were trying for pregnancy had higher cumulative probability of pregnancy at one year compared to women not trying (adjusted 86 % versus 56 %). Of 165 women enrolled preconception who became pregnant, 19 % had a study visit within 30 days of conception. By 10.5 weeks after conception, 75 % of women enrolled preconception had completed a pregnancy study visit; for women enrolled pregnant, the 75 % threshold was reached at 28.4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: There were demographic differences in births from women enrolled preconception trying for pregnancy, preconception not trying for pregnancy, or during pregnancy. Time to pregnancy was shorter for women actively trying for pregnancy. Most women enrolled preconception did not have exposure assessment within 30 days of conception, but they did have exposure assessment much earlier during pregnancy than women who enrolled during pregnancy. BioMed Central 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4581516/ /pubmed/26399430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0067-1 Text en © Stanford et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stanford, Joseph B.
Brenner, Ruth
Fetterer, David
Palmer, Leslie
Schoendorf, Kenneth C.
Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study
title Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study
title_full Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study
title_fullStr Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study
title_short Impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the U.S. National Children’s Study
title_sort impact of preconception enrollment on birth enrollment and timing of exposure assessment in the initial vanguard cohort of the u.s. national children’s study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26399430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0067-1
work_keys_str_mv AT stanfordjosephb impactofpreconceptionenrollmentonbirthenrollmentandtimingofexposureassessmentintheinitialvanguardcohortoftheusnationalchildrensstudy
AT brennerruth impactofpreconceptionenrollmentonbirthenrollmentandtimingofexposureassessmentintheinitialvanguardcohortoftheusnationalchildrensstudy
AT fettererdavid impactofpreconceptionenrollmentonbirthenrollmentandtimingofexposureassessmentintheinitialvanguardcohortoftheusnationalchildrensstudy
AT palmerleslie impactofpreconceptionenrollmentonbirthenrollmentandtimingofexposureassessmentintheinitialvanguardcohortoftheusnationalchildrensstudy
AT schoendorfkennethc impactofpreconceptionenrollmentonbirthenrollmentandtimingofexposureassessmentintheinitialvanguardcohortoftheusnationalchildrensstudy
AT impactofpreconceptionenrollmentonbirthenrollmentandtimingofexposureassessmentintheinitialvanguardcohortoftheusnationalchildrensstudy