Cargando…

Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Consumption of dietary fat has been reported to be associated with gastric cancer risk, but the results of epidemiologic studies remain inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the association between dietary fat intake and gastric can...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Jun, Jiang, Yi, Liu, Xiao, Meng, Qingyang, Xi, Qiulei, Zhuang, Qiulin, Han, Yusong, Gao, Ying, Ding, Qiurong, Wu, Guohao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138580
_version_ 1782391605457584128
author Han, Jun
Jiang, Yi
Liu, Xiao
Meng, Qingyang
Xi, Qiulei
Zhuang, Qiulin
Han, Yusong
Gao, Ying
Ding, Qiurong
Wu, Guohao
author_facet Han, Jun
Jiang, Yi
Liu, Xiao
Meng, Qingyang
Xi, Qiulei
Zhuang, Qiulin
Han, Yusong
Gao, Ying
Ding, Qiurong
Wu, Guohao
author_sort Han, Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Consumption of dietary fat has been reported to be associated with gastric cancer risk, but the results of epidemiologic studies remain inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the association between dietary fat intake and gastric cancer risk. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed to identify observational studies providing quantitative estimates between dietary fat and gastric cancer risk. Random effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risk(SRR) in the highest versus lowest analysis. Categorical dose-response analysis was conducted to quantify the association between dietary fat intake and gastric cancer risk. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using I(2) and tau2(between study variance)statistics. Subgroup analysis and publication bias analysis were also performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles were included in the meta-analysis. The SRR for gastric cancer was 1.18 for individuals with highest intake versus lowest intake of total fat (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.999–1.39; n = 28; P< 0.001; tau(2) = 0.12; I(2) = 69.5%, 95% CI: 55%-79%) and 1.08 with a daily increase in total fat intake (20 g/d) (95%CI: 1.02–1.14; n = 6; P = 0.09; tau(2) = 0.002; I(2) = 46.8%, 95% CI: 0%-79%). Positive association between saturated fat intake (SRR = 1.31; 95%CI: 1.09–1.58;n = 18;P<0.001; tau(2) = 0.08; I(2) = 60.6%, 95% CI: 34%-76%), inverse association between polyunsaturated fat intake (SRR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.65–0.92; n = 16; P = 0.003; tau(2) = 0.06; I(2) = 56.2%, 95% CI: 23%-75%) and vegetable fat intake (SRR = 0.55; 95%CI: 0.41–0.74; n = 4;P = 0.12; tau(2) = 0.04; I(2) = 48.6%, 95% CI: 0%-83%), and no association between monounsaturated fat intake (SRR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.79–1.25; n = 14; P< 0.001; tau(2) = 0.10; I(2) = 63.0%, 95% CI: 34%-79%) and animal fat intake (SRR = 1.10; 95%CI: 0.90–1.33; n = 6; P = 0.13;tau(2) = 0.02; I(2) = 42.0%, 95% CI: 0%-70%) and gastric cancer risk were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that intake of total fat is potentially positively associated with gastric cancer risk, and specific subtypes of fats account for different effects. However, these findings should be confirmed by further well-designed cohort studieswith detailed dietary assessments and strict control of confounders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4581710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45817102015-10-01 Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Han, Jun Jiang, Yi Liu, Xiao Meng, Qingyang Xi, Qiulei Zhuang, Qiulin Han, Yusong Gao, Ying Ding, Qiurong Wu, Guohao PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Consumption of dietary fat has been reported to be associated with gastric cancer risk, but the results of epidemiologic studies remain inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence regarding the association between dietary fat intake and gastric cancer risk. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and EMBASE was performed to identify observational studies providing quantitative estimates between dietary fat and gastric cancer risk. Random effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risk(SRR) in the highest versus lowest analysis. Categorical dose-response analysis was conducted to quantify the association between dietary fat intake and gastric cancer risk. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using I(2) and tau2(between study variance)statistics. Subgroup analysis and publication bias analysis were also performed. RESULTS: Twenty-two articles were included in the meta-analysis. The SRR for gastric cancer was 1.18 for individuals with highest intake versus lowest intake of total fat (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.999–1.39; n = 28; P< 0.001; tau(2) = 0.12; I(2) = 69.5%, 95% CI: 55%-79%) and 1.08 with a daily increase in total fat intake (20 g/d) (95%CI: 1.02–1.14; n = 6; P = 0.09; tau(2) = 0.002; I(2) = 46.8%, 95% CI: 0%-79%). Positive association between saturated fat intake (SRR = 1.31; 95%CI: 1.09–1.58;n = 18;P<0.001; tau(2) = 0.08; I(2) = 60.6%, 95% CI: 34%-76%), inverse association between polyunsaturated fat intake (SRR = 0.77; 95%CI: 0.65–0.92; n = 16; P = 0.003; tau(2) = 0.06; I(2) = 56.2%, 95% CI: 23%-75%) and vegetable fat intake (SRR = 0.55; 95%CI: 0.41–0.74; n = 4;P = 0.12; tau(2) = 0.04; I(2) = 48.6%, 95% CI: 0%-83%), and no association between monounsaturated fat intake (SRR = 1.00; 95%CI: 0.79–1.25; n = 14; P< 0.001; tau(2) = 0.10; I(2) = 63.0%, 95% CI: 34%-79%) and animal fat intake (SRR = 1.10; 95%CI: 0.90–1.33; n = 6; P = 0.13;tau(2) = 0.02; I(2) = 42.0%, 95% CI: 0%-70%) and gastric cancer risk were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that intake of total fat is potentially positively associated with gastric cancer risk, and specific subtypes of fats account for different effects. However, these findings should be confirmed by further well-designed cohort studieswith detailed dietary assessments and strict control of confounders. Public Library of Science 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4581710/ /pubmed/26402223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138580 Text en © 2015 Han et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Han, Jun
Jiang, Yi
Liu, Xiao
Meng, Qingyang
Xi, Qiulei
Zhuang, Qiulin
Han, Yusong
Gao, Ying
Ding, Qiurong
Wu, Guohao
Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_fullStr Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_short Dietary Fat Intake and Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_sort dietary fat intake and risk of gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26402223
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138580
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjun dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT jiangyi dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT liuxiao dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT mengqingyang dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT xiqiulei dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT zhuangqiulin dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT hanyusong dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT gaoying dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT dingqiurong dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT wuguohao dietaryfatintakeandriskofgastriccancerametaanalysisofobservationalstudies