Cargando…

A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?

BACKGROUND: Incidents of absconsion in forensic psychiatric units can have potentially serious consequences, yet surprisingly little is known about the characteristics of patients who abscond from these settings. The few previous studies conducted to date have employed retrospective designs, and no...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cullen, Alexis E., Jewell, Amelia, Tully, John, Coghlan, Suzanne, Dean, Kimberlie, Fahy, Tom
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26401653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138819
_version_ 1782391634295521280
author Cullen, Alexis E.
Jewell, Amelia
Tully, John
Coghlan, Suzanne
Dean, Kimberlie
Fahy, Tom
author_facet Cullen, Alexis E.
Jewell, Amelia
Tully, John
Coghlan, Suzanne
Dean, Kimberlie
Fahy, Tom
author_sort Cullen, Alexis E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Incidents of absconsion in forensic psychiatric units can have potentially serious consequences, yet surprisingly little is known about the characteristics of patients who abscond from these settings. The few previous studies conducted to date have employed retrospective designs, and no attempt has been made to develop an empirically-derived risk assessment scale. In this prospective study, we aimed to identify predictors of absconsion over a two-year period and investigate the feasibility of developing a brief risk assessment scale. METHODS: The study examined a representative sample of 135 patients treated in forensic medium- and low-secure wards. At baseline, demographic, clinical, treatment-related, and offending/behavioural factors were ascertained from electronic medical records and the treating teams. Incidents of absconsion (i.e., failure to return from leave, incidents of escape, and absconding whilst on escorted leave) were assessed at a two-year follow-up. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the strongest predictors of absconsion which were then weighted according to their ability to discriminate absconders and non-absconders. The predictive utility of a brief risk assessment scale based on these weighted items was evaluated using receiver operator characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: During the two-year follow-up period, 27 patients (20%) absconded, accounting for 56 separate incidents. In multivariate analyses, four factors relating to offending and behaviour emerged as the strongest predictors of absconsion: history of sexual offending, previous absconsion, recent inpatient verbal aggression, and recent inpatient substance use. The weighted risk scale derived from these factors had moderate-to-good predictive accuracy (ROC area under the curve: 0.80; sensitivity: 067; specificity: 0.71), a high negative predictive value (0.91), but a low positive predictive value (0.34). CONCLUSION: Potentially-targetable recent behaviours, such as inpatient verbal aggression and substance use, are strong predictors of absconsion in forensic settings; the absence of these factors may enable clinical teams to identify unnecessarily restricted low-risk individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4581860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45818602015-10-01 A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk? Cullen, Alexis E. Jewell, Amelia Tully, John Coghlan, Suzanne Dean, Kimberlie Fahy, Tom PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Incidents of absconsion in forensic psychiatric units can have potentially serious consequences, yet surprisingly little is known about the characteristics of patients who abscond from these settings. The few previous studies conducted to date have employed retrospective designs, and no attempt has been made to develop an empirically-derived risk assessment scale. In this prospective study, we aimed to identify predictors of absconsion over a two-year period and investigate the feasibility of developing a brief risk assessment scale. METHODS: The study examined a representative sample of 135 patients treated in forensic medium- and low-secure wards. At baseline, demographic, clinical, treatment-related, and offending/behavioural factors were ascertained from electronic medical records and the treating teams. Incidents of absconsion (i.e., failure to return from leave, incidents of escape, and absconding whilst on escorted leave) were assessed at a two-year follow-up. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the strongest predictors of absconsion which were then weighted according to their ability to discriminate absconders and non-absconders. The predictive utility of a brief risk assessment scale based on these weighted items was evaluated using receiver operator characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: During the two-year follow-up period, 27 patients (20%) absconded, accounting for 56 separate incidents. In multivariate analyses, four factors relating to offending and behaviour emerged as the strongest predictors of absconsion: history of sexual offending, previous absconsion, recent inpatient verbal aggression, and recent inpatient substance use. The weighted risk scale derived from these factors had moderate-to-good predictive accuracy (ROC area under the curve: 0.80; sensitivity: 067; specificity: 0.71), a high negative predictive value (0.91), but a low positive predictive value (0.34). CONCLUSION: Potentially-targetable recent behaviours, such as inpatient verbal aggression and substance use, are strong predictors of absconsion in forensic settings; the absence of these factors may enable clinical teams to identify unnecessarily restricted low-risk individuals. Public Library of Science 2015-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4581860/ /pubmed/26401653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138819 Text en © 2015 Cullen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cullen, Alexis E.
Jewell, Amelia
Tully, John
Coghlan, Suzanne
Dean, Kimberlie
Fahy, Tom
A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?
title A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?
title_full A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?
title_fullStr A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?
title_full_unstemmed A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?
title_short A Prospective Cohort Study of Absconsion Incidents in Forensic Psychiatric Settings: Can We Identify Those at High-Risk?
title_sort prospective cohort study of absconsion incidents in forensic psychiatric settings: can we identify those at high-risk?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26401653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138819
work_keys_str_mv AT cullenalexise aprospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT jewellamelia aprospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT tullyjohn aprospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT coghlansuzanne aprospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT deankimberlie aprospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT fahytom aprospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT cullenalexise prospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT jewellamelia prospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT tullyjohn prospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT coghlansuzanne prospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT deankimberlie prospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk
AT fahytom prospectivecohortstudyofabsconsionincidentsinforensicpsychiatricsettingscanweidentifythoseathighrisk