Cargando…

Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort

The aim of this study was to validate self-reported diabetes and age at diagnosis among a sample of the British population, using general practitioners (GPs) as the reference standard. Using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), self-reported diabet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pastorino, Silvia, Richards, Marcus, Hardy, Rebecca, Abington, Jane, Wills, Andrew, Kuh, Diana, Pierce, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003
_version_ 1782391640922521600
author Pastorino, Silvia
Richards, Marcus
Hardy, Rebecca
Abington, Jane
Wills, Andrew
Kuh, Diana
Pierce, Mary
author_facet Pastorino, Silvia
Richards, Marcus
Hardy, Rebecca
Abington, Jane
Wills, Andrew
Kuh, Diana
Pierce, Mary
author_sort Pastorino, Silvia
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study was to validate self-reported diabetes and age at diagnosis among a sample of the British population, using general practitioners (GPs) as the reference standard. Using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), self-reported diabetes was determined either in response to a direct question at five follow-ups between 1977 and 2010, or from other self-reported medical information. A validation questionnaire was sent to the GP for all participants who reported a diagnosis of diabetes and gave permission to contact their GP (172). The validity of self-reported diabetes was assessed by calculating the percentage of self-reported diabetes cases that were confirmed by their GP, i.e. the positive predictive value (PPV). The difference between self-reported and GP-confirmed age at diagnosis was analysed with a Bland–Altman plot. Completed questionnaires were obtained from 157 GPs (91.2%). Of these, 149 confirmed their patient self-reported diabetes diagnosis (PPV = 94.9%). Results were similar when self-reported diabetes was assessed by responses to direct questions only (PPV = 95.4%). The average difference between self-reported and GP-reported age at diagnosis was 0.6 years (95% CI 0.2–1.1). We conclude that among the British population questionnaires are a valid method to assess GP-diagnosed diabetes, as measured by responses to a direct question or by patient-reported medical information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4582042
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45820422015-10-27 Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort Pastorino, Silvia Richards, Marcus Hardy, Rebecca Abington, Jane Wills, Andrew Kuh, Diana Pierce, Mary Prim Care Diabetes Brief Report The aim of this study was to validate self-reported diabetes and age at diagnosis among a sample of the British population, using general practitioners (GPs) as the reference standard. Using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), self-reported diabetes was determined either in response to a direct question at five follow-ups between 1977 and 2010, or from other self-reported medical information. A validation questionnaire was sent to the GP for all participants who reported a diagnosis of diabetes and gave permission to contact their GP (172). The validity of self-reported diabetes was assessed by calculating the percentage of self-reported diabetes cases that were confirmed by their GP, i.e. the positive predictive value (PPV). The difference between self-reported and GP-confirmed age at diagnosis was analysed with a Bland–Altman plot. Completed questionnaires were obtained from 157 GPs (91.2%). Of these, 149 confirmed their patient self-reported diabetes diagnosis (PPV = 94.9%). Results were similar when self-reported diabetes was assessed by responses to direct questions only (PPV = 95.4%). The average difference between self-reported and GP-reported age at diagnosis was 0.6 years (95% CI 0.2–1.1). We conclude that among the British population questionnaires are a valid method to assess GP-diagnosed diabetes, as measured by responses to a direct question or by patient-reported medical information. Elsevier 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4582042/ /pubmed/25037637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003 Text en © 2015 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Pastorino, Silvia
Richards, Marcus
Hardy, Rebecca
Abington, Jane
Wills, Andrew
Kuh, Diana
Pierce, Mary
Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
title Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
title_full Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
title_fullStr Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
title_full_unstemmed Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
title_short Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
title_sort validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 british birth cohort
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582042/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT pastorinosilvia validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT richardsmarcus validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT hardyrebecca validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT abingtonjane validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT willsandrew validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT kuhdiana validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT piercemary validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort
AT validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort