Cargando…
Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort
The aim of this study was to validate self-reported diabetes and age at diagnosis among a sample of the British population, using general practitioners (GPs) as the reference standard. Using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), self-reported diabet...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003 |
_version_ | 1782391640922521600 |
---|---|
author | Pastorino, Silvia Richards, Marcus Hardy, Rebecca Abington, Jane Wills, Andrew Kuh, Diana Pierce, Mary |
author_facet | Pastorino, Silvia Richards, Marcus Hardy, Rebecca Abington, Jane Wills, Andrew Kuh, Diana Pierce, Mary |
author_sort | Pastorino, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study was to validate self-reported diabetes and age at diagnosis among a sample of the British population, using general practitioners (GPs) as the reference standard. Using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), self-reported diabetes was determined either in response to a direct question at five follow-ups between 1977 and 2010, or from other self-reported medical information. A validation questionnaire was sent to the GP for all participants who reported a diagnosis of diabetes and gave permission to contact their GP (172). The validity of self-reported diabetes was assessed by calculating the percentage of self-reported diabetes cases that were confirmed by their GP, i.e. the positive predictive value (PPV). The difference between self-reported and GP-confirmed age at diagnosis was analysed with a Bland–Altman plot. Completed questionnaires were obtained from 157 GPs (91.2%). Of these, 149 confirmed their patient self-reported diabetes diagnosis (PPV = 94.9%). Results were similar when self-reported diabetes was assessed by responses to direct questions only (PPV = 95.4%). The average difference between self-reported and GP-reported age at diagnosis was 0.6 years (95% CI 0.2–1.1). We conclude that among the British population questionnaires are a valid method to assess GP-diagnosed diabetes, as measured by responses to a direct question or by patient-reported medical information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4582042 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45820422015-10-27 Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort Pastorino, Silvia Richards, Marcus Hardy, Rebecca Abington, Jane Wills, Andrew Kuh, Diana Pierce, Mary Prim Care Diabetes Brief Report The aim of this study was to validate self-reported diabetes and age at diagnosis among a sample of the British population, using general practitioners (GPs) as the reference standard. Using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), self-reported diabetes was determined either in response to a direct question at five follow-ups between 1977 and 2010, or from other self-reported medical information. A validation questionnaire was sent to the GP for all participants who reported a diagnosis of diabetes and gave permission to contact their GP (172). The validity of self-reported diabetes was assessed by calculating the percentage of self-reported diabetes cases that were confirmed by their GP, i.e. the positive predictive value (PPV). The difference between self-reported and GP-confirmed age at diagnosis was analysed with a Bland–Altman plot. Completed questionnaires were obtained from 157 GPs (91.2%). Of these, 149 confirmed their patient self-reported diabetes diagnosis (PPV = 94.9%). Results were similar when self-reported diabetes was assessed by responses to direct questions only (PPV = 95.4%). The average difference between self-reported and GP-reported age at diagnosis was 0.6 years (95% CI 0.2–1.1). We conclude that among the British population questionnaires are a valid method to assess GP-diagnosed diabetes, as measured by responses to a direct question or by patient-reported medical information. Elsevier 2015-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4582042/ /pubmed/25037637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003 Text en © 2015 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Pastorino, Silvia Richards, Marcus Hardy, Rebecca Abington, Jane Wills, Andrew Kuh, Diana Pierce, Mary Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort |
title | Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort |
title_full | Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort |
title_fullStr | Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort |
title_short | Validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 British birth cohort |
title_sort | validation of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes in the 1946 british birth cohort |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582042/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25037637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2014.05.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pastorinosilvia validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT richardsmarcus validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT hardyrebecca validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT abingtonjane validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT willsandrew validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT kuhdiana validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT piercemary validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort AT validationofselfreporteddiagnosisofdiabetesinthe1946britishbirthcohort |