Cargando…

Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics

Sonomammography is often the first additional examination performed in the diagnostics of breast diseases. The development of ultrasound imaging techniques, particularly the introduction of high frequency transducers, matrix transducers, harmonic imaging and finally, elastography, influenced the imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakubowski, Wiesław, Dobruch-Sobczak, Katarzyna, Migda, Bartosz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675358
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2012.0014
_version_ 1782391713844690944
author Jakubowski, Wiesław
Dobruch-Sobczak, Katarzyna
Migda, Bartosz
author_facet Jakubowski, Wiesław
Dobruch-Sobczak, Katarzyna
Migda, Bartosz
author_sort Jakubowski, Wiesław
collection PubMed
description Sonomammography is often the first additional examination performed in the diagnostics of breast diseases. The development of ultrasound imaging techniques, particularly the introduction of high frequency transducers, matrix transducers, harmonic imaging and finally, elastography, influenced the improvement of breast disease diagnostics. Nevertheless, as in each imaging method, there are errors and mistakes resulting from the technical limitations of the method, breast anatomy (fibrous remodeling), insufficient sensitivity and, in particular, specificity. Errors in breast ultrasound diagnostics can be divided into impossible to be avoided and potentially possible to be reduced. In this article the most frequently made errors in ultrasound have been presented, including the ones caused by the presence of artifacts resulting from volumetric averaging in the near and far field, artifacts in cysts or in dilated lactiferous ducts (reverberations, comet tail artifacts, lateral beam artifacts), improper setting of general enhancement or time gain curve or range. Errors dependent on the examiner, resulting in the wrong BIRADS-usg classification, are divided into negative and positive errors. The sources of these errors have been listed. The methods of minimization of the number of errors made have been discussed, including the ones related to the appropriate examination technique, taking into account data from case history and the use of the greatest possible number of additional options such as: harmonic imaging, color and power Doppler and elastography. In the article examples of errors resulting from the technical conditions of the method have been presented, and those dependent on the examiner which are related to the great diversity and variation of ultrasound images of pathological breast lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4582529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medical Communications Sp. z o.o.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45825292015-12-15 Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics Jakubowski, Wiesław Dobruch-Sobczak, Katarzyna Migda, Bartosz J Ultrason Review Sonomammography is often the first additional examination performed in the diagnostics of breast diseases. The development of ultrasound imaging techniques, particularly the introduction of high frequency transducers, matrix transducers, harmonic imaging and finally, elastography, influenced the improvement of breast disease diagnostics. Nevertheless, as in each imaging method, there are errors and mistakes resulting from the technical limitations of the method, breast anatomy (fibrous remodeling), insufficient sensitivity and, in particular, specificity. Errors in breast ultrasound diagnostics can be divided into impossible to be avoided and potentially possible to be reduced. In this article the most frequently made errors in ultrasound have been presented, including the ones caused by the presence of artifacts resulting from volumetric averaging in the near and far field, artifacts in cysts or in dilated lactiferous ducts (reverberations, comet tail artifacts, lateral beam artifacts), improper setting of general enhancement or time gain curve or range. Errors dependent on the examiner, resulting in the wrong BIRADS-usg classification, are divided into negative and positive errors. The sources of these errors have been listed. The methods of minimization of the number of errors made have been discussed, including the ones related to the appropriate examination technique, taking into account data from case history and the use of the greatest possible number of additional options such as: harmonic imaging, color and power Doppler and elastography. In the article examples of errors resulting from the technical conditions of the method have been presented, and those dependent on the examiner which are related to the great diversity and variation of ultrasound images of pathological breast lesions. Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2012-09-30 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4582529/ /pubmed/26675358 http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2012.0014 Text en 2012 Polish Ultrasound Society. Published by Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (CC BY-NC-ND). Reproduction is permitted for personal, educational, non-commercial use, provided that the original article is in whole, unmodified, and properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Jakubowski, Wiesław
Dobruch-Sobczak, Katarzyna
Migda, Bartosz
Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
title Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
title_full Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
title_fullStr Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
title_full_unstemmed Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
title_short Errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
title_sort errors and mistakes in breast ultrasound diagnostics
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4582529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26675358
http://dx.doi.org/10.15557/JoU.2012.0014
work_keys_str_mv AT jakubowskiwiesław errorsandmistakesinbreastultrasounddiagnostics
AT dobruchsobczakkatarzyna errorsandmistakesinbreastultrasounddiagnostics
AT migdabartosz errorsandmistakesinbreastultrasounddiagnostics