Cargando…

‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps

Mobile health apps are health and wellness programs available on mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets. In three systematic assessments published in BMC Medicine, Huckvale and colleagues demonstrate that widely available health apps meant to help patients calculate their appropriate insulin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wicks, Paul, Chiauzzi, Emil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0451-z
_version_ 1782391804639838208
author Wicks, Paul
Chiauzzi, Emil
author_facet Wicks, Paul
Chiauzzi, Emil
author_sort Wicks, Paul
collection PubMed
description Mobile health apps are health and wellness programs available on mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets. In three systematic assessments published in BMC Medicine, Huckvale and colleagues demonstrate that widely available health apps meant to help patients calculate their appropriate insulin dosage, educate themselves about asthma, or perform other important functions are methodologically weak. Insulin dose calculators lacked user input validation and made inappropriate dose recommendations, with a lack of documentation throughout. Since 2011, asthma apps have become more interactive, but have not improved in quality; peak flow calculators have the same issues as the insulin calculators. A review of the accredited National Health Service Health Apps Library found poor and inconsistent implementation of privacy and security, with 28 % of apps lacking a privacy policy and one even transmitting personally identifying data the policy claimed would be anonymous. Ensuring patient safety might require a new approach, whether that be a consumer education program at one extreme or government regulation at the other. App store owners could ensure transparency of algorithms (whiteboxing), data sharing, and data quality. While a proper balance must be struck between innovation and caution, patient safety must be paramount. Please see related articles: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/106 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/58
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4583172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45831722015-09-26 ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps Wicks, Paul Chiauzzi, Emil BMC Med Commentary Mobile health apps are health and wellness programs available on mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets. In three systematic assessments published in BMC Medicine, Huckvale and colleagues demonstrate that widely available health apps meant to help patients calculate their appropriate insulin dosage, educate themselves about asthma, or perform other important functions are methodologically weak. Insulin dose calculators lacked user input validation and made inappropriate dose recommendations, with a lack of documentation throughout. Since 2011, asthma apps have become more interactive, but have not improved in quality; peak flow calculators have the same issues as the insulin calculators. A review of the accredited National Health Service Health Apps Library found poor and inconsistent implementation of privacy and security, with 28 % of apps lacking a privacy policy and one even transmitting personally identifying data the policy claimed would be anonymous. Ensuring patient safety might require a new approach, whether that be a consumer education program at one extreme or government regulation at the other. App store owners could ensure transparency of algorithms (whiteboxing), data sharing, and data quality. While a proper balance must be struck between innovation and caution, patient safety must be paramount. Please see related articles: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0444-y, http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/106 and http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/58 BioMed Central 2015-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4583172/ /pubmed/26404791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0451-z Text en © Wicks and Chiauzzi. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Commentary
Wicks, Paul
Chiauzzi, Emil
‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
title ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
title_full ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
title_fullStr ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
title_full_unstemmed ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
title_short ‘Trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
title_sort ‘trust but verify’ – five approaches to ensure safe medical apps
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26404791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0451-z
work_keys_str_mv AT wickspaul trustbutverifyfiveapproachestoensuresafemedicalapps
AT chiauzziemil trustbutverifyfiveapproachestoensuresafemedicalapps