Cargando…
From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries
BACKGROUND: Coverage decisions determining the benefit baskets of health systems have been increasingly relying on evidence regarding patient benefit and costs. Relevant structures, methodologies, and processes have especially been established for pharmaceuticals but approaches differ. The objective...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0028-5 |
_version_ | 1782391899381825536 |
---|---|
author | Panteli, Dimitra Eckhardt, Helene Nolting, Alexandra Busse, Reinhard Kulig, Michael |
author_facet | Panteli, Dimitra Eckhardt, Helene Nolting, Alexandra Busse, Reinhard Kulig, Michael |
author_sort | Panteli, Dimitra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Coverage decisions determining the benefit baskets of health systems have been increasingly relying on evidence regarding patient benefit and costs. Relevant structures, methodologies, and processes have especially been established for pharmaceuticals but approaches differ. The objective of this work was thus to identify institutions in a broad range of European countries (n = 36) in charge of determining the value of pharmaceuticals for pricing and reimbursement purposes and to map their decision-making process; to examine the different approaches and consider national and supranational possibilities for best practice. METHODS: Institutions were identified through websites of international networks, ministries, and published literature. Details on institutional practices were supplemented with information from institution websites and linked online sources. RESULTS: The type and extent of information available varied considerably across countries. Different types of public regulatory bodies are involved in pharmaceutical coverage decisions, assuming a range of responsibilities. As a rule, the assessment of scientific evidence is kept structurally separate from its appraisal. Recommendations on value are uniformly issued by specific committees within or commissioned by responsible institutions; these institutions often also act as decision-makers on reimbursement status and level or market price. While effectiveness and costs are important criteria in all countries, the latter are often considered on a case-by-case basis. In all countries, manufacturer applications, including relevant evidence, are used as one of the main sources of information for the assessment. CONCLUSION: Transparency of evidence-based coverage decisions should be enhanced. International collaboration can facilitate knowledge exchange, improve efficiency of information production, and strengthen new or developing systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0028-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4583728 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45837282015-09-27 From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries Panteli, Dimitra Eckhardt, Helene Nolting, Alexandra Busse, Reinhard Kulig, Michael Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Coverage decisions determining the benefit baskets of health systems have been increasingly relying on evidence regarding patient benefit and costs. Relevant structures, methodologies, and processes have especially been established for pharmaceuticals but approaches differ. The objective of this work was thus to identify institutions in a broad range of European countries (n = 36) in charge of determining the value of pharmaceuticals for pricing and reimbursement purposes and to map their decision-making process; to examine the different approaches and consider national and supranational possibilities for best practice. METHODS: Institutions were identified through websites of international networks, ministries, and published literature. Details on institutional practices were supplemented with information from institution websites and linked online sources. RESULTS: The type and extent of information available varied considerably across countries. Different types of public regulatory bodies are involved in pharmaceutical coverage decisions, assuming a range of responsibilities. As a rule, the assessment of scientific evidence is kept structurally separate from its appraisal. Recommendations on value are uniformly issued by specific committees within or commissioned by responsible institutions; these institutions often also act as decision-makers on reimbursement status and level or market price. While effectiveness and costs are important criteria in all countries, the latter are often considered on a case-by-case basis. In all countries, manufacturer applications, including relevant evidence, are used as one of the main sources of information for the assessment. CONCLUSION: Transparency of evidence-based coverage decisions should be enhanced. International collaboration can facilitate knowledge exchange, improve efficiency of information production, and strengthen new or developing systems. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12961-015-0028-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4583728/ /pubmed/26407728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0028-5 Text en © Panteli et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Panteli, Dimitra Eckhardt, Helene Nolting, Alexandra Busse, Reinhard Kulig, Michael From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries |
title | From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries |
title_full | From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries |
title_fullStr | From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries |
title_full_unstemmed | From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries |
title_short | From market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 European countries |
title_sort | from market access to patient access: overview of evidence-based approaches for the reimbursement and pricing of pharmaceuticals in 36 european countries |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583728/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0028-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pantelidimitra frommarketaccesstopatientaccessoverviewofevidencebasedapproachesforthereimbursementandpricingofpharmaceuticalsin36europeancountries AT eckhardthelene frommarketaccesstopatientaccessoverviewofevidencebasedapproachesforthereimbursementandpricingofpharmaceuticalsin36europeancountries AT noltingalexandra frommarketaccesstopatientaccessoverviewofevidencebasedapproachesforthereimbursementandpricingofpharmaceuticalsin36europeancountries AT bussereinhard frommarketaccesstopatientaccessoverviewofevidencebasedapproachesforthereimbursementandpricingofpharmaceuticalsin36europeancountries AT kuligmichael frommarketaccesstopatientaccessoverviewofevidencebasedapproachesforthereimbursementandpricingofpharmaceuticalsin36europeancountries |