Cargando…
Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda
The demand for accelerated forms of evidence synthesis is on the rise, largely in response to requests by health care decision makers for expeditious assessment and up-to-date information about health care technologies and health services and programs. As a field, rapid review evidence synthesis is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0111-6 |
_version_ | 1782391903811010560 |
---|---|
author | Polisena, Julie Garritty, Chantelle Umscheid, Craig A. Kamel, Chris Samra, Kevin Smith, Jeannette Vosilla, Ann |
author_facet | Polisena, Julie Garritty, Chantelle Umscheid, Craig A. Kamel, Chris Samra, Kevin Smith, Jeannette Vosilla, Ann |
author_sort | Polisena, Julie |
collection | PubMed |
description | The demand for accelerated forms of evidence synthesis is on the rise, largely in response to requests by health care decision makers for expeditious assessment and up-to-date information about health care technologies and health services and programs. As a field, rapid review evidence synthesis is marked by a tension between the strategic priority to inform health care decision-making and the scientific imperative to produce robust, high-quality research that soundly supports health policy and practice. In early 2015, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health convened a forum in partnership with the British Columbia Ministry of Health, the British Columbia Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and the University of Pennsylvania. More than 150 evidence synthesis producers and end users attended the Rapid Review Summit: Then, Now and in the Future. The Summit program focused on the evolving role and practices of rapid reviews to support informed health care policy and clinical decision-making, including the uptake and use of health technology assessment. Our discussion paper highlights the important discussions that occurred during the Rapid Review Summit. It focuses on the initial development of a research agenda that resulted from the Summit presentations and discussions. The research topics centered on three key areas of interest: (1) how to conduct a rapid review; (2) investigating the validity and utility of rapid reviews; and (3) how to improve access to rapid reviews. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4583747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45837472015-09-27 Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda Polisena, Julie Garritty, Chantelle Umscheid, Craig A. Kamel, Chris Samra, Kevin Smith, Jeannette Vosilla, Ann Syst Rev Commentary The demand for accelerated forms of evidence synthesis is on the rise, largely in response to requests by health care decision makers for expeditious assessment and up-to-date information about health care technologies and health services and programs. As a field, rapid review evidence synthesis is marked by a tension between the strategic priority to inform health care decision-making and the scientific imperative to produce robust, high-quality research that soundly supports health policy and practice. In early 2015, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health convened a forum in partnership with the British Columbia Ministry of Health, the British Columbia Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, and the University of Pennsylvania. More than 150 evidence synthesis producers and end users attended the Rapid Review Summit: Then, Now and in the Future. The Summit program focused on the evolving role and practices of rapid reviews to support informed health care policy and clinical decision-making, including the uptake and use of health technology assessment. Our discussion paper highlights the important discussions that occurred during the Rapid Review Summit. It focuses on the initial development of a research agenda that resulted from the Summit presentations and discussions. The research topics centered on three key areas of interest: (1) how to conduct a rapid review; (2) investigating the validity and utility of rapid reviews; and (3) how to improve access to rapid reviews. BioMed Central 2015-09-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4583747/ /pubmed/26407674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0111-6 Text en © Polisena et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Polisena, Julie Garritty, Chantelle Umscheid, Craig A. Kamel, Chris Samra, Kevin Smith, Jeannette Vosilla, Ann Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
title | Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
title_full | Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
title_fullStr | Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
title_short | Rapid Review Summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
title_sort | rapid review summit: an overview and initiation of a research agenda |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4583747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26407674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0111-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polisenajulie rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda AT garrittychantelle rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda AT umscheidcraiga rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda AT kamelchris rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda AT samrakevin rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda AT smithjeannette rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda AT vosillaann rapidreviewsummitanoverviewandinitiationofaresearchagenda |