Cargando…

Those Responsible for Approving Research Studies Have Poor Knowledge of Research Study Design: a Knowledge Assessment of Institutional Review Board Members

BACKGROUND: Institutional Review Board (IRB) members have a duty to protect the integrity of the research process, but little is known about their basic knowledge of clinical research study designs METHODS: A nationwide sample of IRB members from major US research universities completed a web-based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Mhaskar, Rahul, Pathak, Elizabeth Barnett, Wieten, Sarah, Guterbock, Thomas M., Kumar, Ambuj, Djulbegovic, Benjamin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	AVICENA, d.o.o., Sarajevo 2015
Materias:	Original Paper
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584095/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26483590 http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2015.23.196-201

Ejemplares similares

When are clinical trials beneficial for study patients and future patients? A factorial vignette-based survey of institutional review board members
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

At What Level of Collective Equipoise Does a Randomized Clinical Trial Become Ethical for the Members of Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committees?
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Variations in Institutional Review Board Approval in the Implementation of an Improvement Research Study
por: Patel, Darpan I., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

From hospice to hospital: short-term follow-up study of hospice patient outcomes in a US acute care hospital surveillance system
por: Pathak, Elizabeth Barnett, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Benchmarks for detecting ‘breakthroughs’ in clinical trials: empirical assessment of the probability of large treatment effects using kernel density estimation
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Research Board Approves LHCb Experiment
Publicado: (1998)

Survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer without treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Wao, Hesborn, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Concordance between decision analysis and matching systematic review of randomized controlled trials in assessment of treatment comparisons: a systematic review
por: Mhaskar, Rahul S, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A Flexible Alternative to the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Assessing the Prognostic Accuracy of Hospice Patient Survival
por: Miladinovic, Branko, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Need for Clinical Trial Registry and Institutional Review Board Approval in Human Subjects Research
por: Kim, Soo Young
Publicado: (2013)

Institutional review board training when patients and community members are engaged as researchers
por: Westfall, John M, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Ethical Issues in Research: Perceptions of Researchers, Research Ethics Board Members and Research Ethics Experts
por: Drolet, Marie-Josée, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

JAMA Published Fewer Industry-Funded Studies after Introducing a Requirement for Independent Statistical Analysis
por: Wager, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Critical qualitative research on ‘madness’: knowledge making and activism among those designated ‘mad’
por: Rose, Diana
Publicado: (2021)

Research to knowledge
por: Gopikrishna, Velayutham, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward research among Oman medical specialty board residents
por: Abri, Hajar Al, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Breakthroughs in hereditary angioedema management: a systematic review of approved drugs and those under research
por: Nicola, Stefania, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
por: Mhaskar, Rahul, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Knowledge synthesis and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research
por: Graham, Ian D
Publicado: (2012)

Online research article discussion board to increase knowledge translation during emergency medicine residency
por: Stoneking, Lisa R, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Researchers’ experiences working with community advisory boards: How community member feedback impacted the research
por: Brockman, Tabetha A., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Corrigendum: Breakthroughs in hereditary angioedema management: a systematic review of approved drugs and those under research
Publicado: (2019)

Protected Lists of Members : Experiment Committees, Research Board and LHC-RRBs
por: Mage-Granados, Patricia
Publicado: (2016)

Understanding of Essential Elements Required in Informed Consent Form among Researchers and Institutional Review Board Members
por: Koonrungsesomboon, Nut, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Ethical Challenges in COVID-19 Biospecimen Research: Perspectives From Institutional Review Board Members and Bioethicists
por: Lapid, Maria I., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Treatment Success in Cancer: Industry Compared to Publicly Sponsored Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Djulbegovic, Benjamin, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Fostering the conduct of ethical and equitable research practices: the imperative for integrated knowledge translation in research conducted by and with indigenous community members
por: Jull, Janet, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

15296 A scoping review of challenges to approve community-engaged research proposals and best practices when working with the Institutional Review Board
por: Pan, Janet, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia
por: Javanparast, Sara, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Knowledge translation of research findings
por: Grimshaw, Jeremy M, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Research USA: knowledge for the future
por: Crewe, Albert V, et al.
Publicado: (1964)

African indigenous knowledge and research
por: Owusu-Ansah, Frances E., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Riding the knowledge translation roundabout: lessons learned from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Summer Institute in knowledge translation
por: Kho, Michelle E, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Constructing Knowledge Through Research, Disseminating Knowledge Through Publication
Publicado: (2019)

How should we assess knowledge translation in research organizations; designing a knowledge translation self-assessment tool for research institutes (SATORI)
por: Gholami, Jaleh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Canadian research ethics board members’ attitudes toward benefits from clinical trials
por: Cook, Kori, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Impact of Next Generation Sequencing on the Organization and Funding of Returning Research Results: Survey of Canadian Research Ethics Boards Members
por: Jaitovich Groisman, Iris, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

4554 Researchers’ Experiences Working With Community Advisory Boards: How Community Member and Patient Stakeholder Feedback Impacted The Research
por: Brockman, Tabetha A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Health Professions Education Research and the Institutional Review Board
por: Heflin, Mitchell T., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What’s in a “research passport”? A collaborative autoethnography of institutional approvals in public involvement in research
por: Laterza, Vito, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_casdp5tcj5epn0gso7283i34a8