Cargando…
‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26412243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9 |
_version_ | 1782391950212595712 |
---|---|
author | Kaye, Jane Muddyman, Dawn Smee, Carol Kennedy, Karen Bell, Jessica |
author_facet | Kaye, Jane Muddyman, Dawn Smee, Carol Kennedy, Karen Bell, Jessica |
author_sort | Kaye, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K project is an example of a human genomics consortium funded to provide insights into the genomics of rare conditions, and establish a community resource from generated sequence data. To achieve its objectives according to the agreed timetable, the UK10K project established an internal governance system to expedite the research and to deal with the complex issues that arose. The project’s governance structure exemplifies a new form of network governance called ‘pop-up’ governance. ‘Pop-up’ because: it was put together quickly, existed for a specific period, was designed for a specific purpose, and was dismantled easily on project completion. In this paper, we use UK10K to describe how ‘pop-up’ governance works on the ground and how relational, hierarchical and contractual governance mechanisms are used in this new form of network governance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4584211 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45842112015-10-02 ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K Kaye, Jane Muddyman, Dawn Smee, Carol Kennedy, Karen Bell, Jessica Life Sci Soc Policy Research Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K project is an example of a human genomics consortium funded to provide insights into the genomics of rare conditions, and establish a community resource from generated sequence data. To achieve its objectives according to the agreed timetable, the UK10K project established an internal governance system to expedite the research and to deal with the complex issues that arose. The project’s governance structure exemplifies a new form of network governance called ‘pop-up’ governance. ‘Pop-up’ because: it was put together quickly, existed for a specific period, was designed for a specific purpose, and was dismantled easily on project completion. In this paper, we use UK10K to describe how ‘pop-up’ governance works on the ground and how relational, hierarchical and contractual governance mechanisms are used in this new form of network governance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4584211/ /pubmed/26412243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9 Text en © Kaye et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Kaye, Jane Muddyman, Dawn Smee, Carol Kennedy, Karen Bell, Jessica ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K |
title | ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K |
title_full | ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K |
title_fullStr | ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K |
title_short | ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K |
title_sort | ‘pop-up’ governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of uk10k |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584211/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26412243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kayejane popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k AT muddymandawn popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k AT smeecarol popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k AT kennedykaren popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k AT belljessica popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k AT popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k |