Cargando…

‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K

Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaye, Jane, Muddyman, Dawn, Smee, Carol, Kennedy, Karen, Bell, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26412243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9
_version_ 1782391950212595712
author Kaye, Jane
Muddyman, Dawn
Smee, Carol
Kennedy, Karen
Bell, Jessica
author_facet Kaye, Jane
Muddyman, Dawn
Smee, Carol
Kennedy, Karen
Bell, Jessica
author_sort Kaye, Jane
collection PubMed
description Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K project is an example of a human genomics consortium funded to provide insights into the genomics of rare conditions, and establish a community resource from generated sequence data. To achieve its objectives according to the agreed timetable, the UK10K project established an internal governance system to expedite the research and to deal with the complex issues that arose. The project’s governance structure exemplifies a new form of network governance called ‘pop-up’ governance. ‘Pop-up’ because: it was put together quickly, existed for a specific period, was designed for a specific purpose, and was dismantled easily on project completion. In this paper, we use UK10K to describe how ‘pop-up’ governance works on the ground and how relational, hierarchical and contractual governance mechanisms are used in this new form of network governance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4584211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45842112015-10-02 ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K Kaye, Jane Muddyman, Dawn Smee, Carol Kennedy, Karen Bell, Jessica Life Sci Soc Policy Research Innovations in information technologies have facilitated the development of new styles of research networks and forms of governance. This is evident in genomics where increasingly, research is carried out by large, interdisciplinary consortia focussing on a specific research endeavour. The UK10K project is an example of a human genomics consortium funded to provide insights into the genomics of rare conditions, and establish a community resource from generated sequence data. To achieve its objectives according to the agreed timetable, the UK10K project established an internal governance system to expedite the research and to deal with the complex issues that arose. The project’s governance structure exemplifies a new form of network governance called ‘pop-up’ governance. ‘Pop-up’ because: it was put together quickly, existed for a specific period, was designed for a specific purpose, and was dismantled easily on project completion. In this paper, we use UK10K to describe how ‘pop-up’ governance works on the ground and how relational, hierarchical and contractual governance mechanisms are used in this new form of network governance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4584211/ /pubmed/26412243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9 Text en © Kaye et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Kaye, Jane
Muddyman, Dawn
Smee, Carol
Kennedy, Karen
Bell, Jessica
‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
title ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
title_full ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
title_fullStr ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
title_full_unstemmed ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
title_short ‘Pop-Up’ Governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of UK10K
title_sort ‘pop-up’ governance: developing internal governance frameworks for consortia: the example of uk10k
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26412243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-015-0028-9
work_keys_str_mv AT kayejane popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k
AT muddymandawn popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k
AT smeecarol popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k
AT kennedykaren popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k
AT belljessica popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k
AT popupgovernancedevelopinginternalgovernanceframeworksforconsortiatheexampleofuk10k