Cargando…

Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacob, Julian, Heymann, Steve, Borget, Isabelle, Dumas, Isabelle, Riahi, Elyes, Maroun, Pierre, Ezra, Patrick, Roberti, Elena, Rivera, Sofia, Deutsch, Eric, Bourgier, Céline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00199
_version_ 1782392106847830016
author Jacob, Julian
Heymann, Steve
Borget, Isabelle
Dumas, Isabelle
Riahi, Elyes
Maroun, Pierre
Ezra, Patrick
Roberti, Elena
Rivera, Sofia
Deutsch, Eric
Bourgier, Céline
author_facet Jacob, Julian
Heymann, Steve
Borget, Isabelle
Dumas, Isabelle
Riahi, Elyes
Maroun, Pierre
Ezra, Patrick
Roberti, Elena
Rivera, Sofia
Deutsch, Eric
Bourgier, Céline
author_sort Jacob, Julian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions). Margins between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume (PTV) were 5 mm in the three dimensions. Parameters of interest were the central lung distance (CLD) and the inferior central margin (ICM). Daily movements were applied to the baseline treatment planning (TP1) to design a further TP (TP2). The PTV coverage and organ at risk exposure were measured on both TP1 and TP2, before being compared. RESULTS: A total of 241 portal images were analyzed. The random and systematic errors were 2.6 and 3.7 mm for the CLD, 4.3 and 6.9 mm for the ICM, respectively. No significant consequence on the PTV treatments was observed (mean variations: +0.1%, p = 0.56 and −1.8%, p = 0.08 for the breast and the tumor bed, respectively). The ipsilateral lung and heart exposure was not significantly modified. CONCLUSION: In our series, the daily interfraction variations had no significant effect on the PTV coverage or healthy tissue exposure during breast radiotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4584980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45849802015-10-05 Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study Jacob, Julian Heymann, Steve Borget, Isabelle Dumas, Isabelle Riahi, Elyes Maroun, Pierre Ezra, Patrick Roberti, Elena Rivera, Sofia Deutsch, Eric Bourgier, Céline Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions). Margins between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume (PTV) were 5 mm in the three dimensions. Parameters of interest were the central lung distance (CLD) and the inferior central margin (ICM). Daily movements were applied to the baseline treatment planning (TP1) to design a further TP (TP2). The PTV coverage and organ at risk exposure were measured on both TP1 and TP2, before being compared. RESULTS: A total of 241 portal images were analyzed. The random and systematic errors were 2.6 and 3.7 mm for the CLD, 4.3 and 6.9 mm for the ICM, respectively. No significant consequence on the PTV treatments was observed (mean variations: +0.1%, p = 0.56 and −1.8%, p = 0.08 for the breast and the tumor bed, respectively). The ipsilateral lung and heart exposure was not significantly modified. CONCLUSION: In our series, the daily interfraction variations had no significant effect on the PTV coverage or healthy tissue exposure during breast radiotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4584980/ /pubmed/26442211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00199 Text en Copyright © 2015 Jacob, Heymann, Borget, Dumas, Riahi, Maroun, Ezra, Roberti, Rivera, Deutsch and Bourgier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Jacob, Julian
Heymann, Steve
Borget, Isabelle
Dumas, Isabelle
Riahi, Elyes
Maroun, Pierre
Ezra, Patrick
Roberti, Elena
Rivera, Sofia
Deutsch, Eric
Bourgier, Céline
Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
title Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
title_full Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
title_fullStr Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
title_short Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
title_sort dosimetric effects of the interfraction variations during whole breast radiotherapy: a prospective study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442211
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00199
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobjulian dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT heymannsteve dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT borgetisabelle dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT dumasisabelle dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT riahielyes dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT marounpierre dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT ezrapatrick dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT robertielena dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT riverasofia dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT deutscheric dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy
AT bourgierceline dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy