Cargando…
Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions)....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00199 |
_version_ | 1782392106847830016 |
---|---|
author | Jacob, Julian Heymann, Steve Borget, Isabelle Dumas, Isabelle Riahi, Elyes Maroun, Pierre Ezra, Patrick Roberti, Elena Rivera, Sofia Deutsch, Eric Bourgier, Céline |
author_facet | Jacob, Julian Heymann, Steve Borget, Isabelle Dumas, Isabelle Riahi, Elyes Maroun, Pierre Ezra, Patrick Roberti, Elena Rivera, Sofia Deutsch, Eric Bourgier, Céline |
author_sort | Jacob, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions). Margins between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume (PTV) were 5 mm in the three dimensions. Parameters of interest were the central lung distance (CLD) and the inferior central margin (ICM). Daily movements were applied to the baseline treatment planning (TP1) to design a further TP (TP2). The PTV coverage and organ at risk exposure were measured on both TP1 and TP2, before being compared. RESULTS: A total of 241 portal images were analyzed. The random and systematic errors were 2.6 and 3.7 mm for the CLD, 4.3 and 6.9 mm for the ICM, respectively. No significant consequence on the PTV treatments was observed (mean variations: +0.1%, p = 0.56 and −1.8%, p = 0.08 for the breast and the tumor bed, respectively). The ipsilateral lung and heart exposure was not significantly modified. CONCLUSION: In our series, the daily interfraction variations had no significant effect on the PTV coverage or healthy tissue exposure during breast radiotherapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4584980 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45849802015-10-05 Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study Jacob, Julian Heymann, Steve Borget, Isabelle Dumas, Isabelle Riahi, Elyes Maroun, Pierre Ezra, Patrick Roberti, Elena Rivera, Sofia Deutsch, Eric Bourgier, Céline Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of the interfraction variations during breast radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Daily portal imaging measurements were prospectively performed in 10 patients treated with adjuvant whole breast irradiation (50 Gy/25 fractions). Margins between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume (PTV) were 5 mm in the three dimensions. Parameters of interest were the central lung distance (CLD) and the inferior central margin (ICM). Daily movements were applied to the baseline treatment planning (TP1) to design a further TP (TP2). The PTV coverage and organ at risk exposure were measured on both TP1 and TP2, before being compared. RESULTS: A total of 241 portal images were analyzed. The random and systematic errors were 2.6 and 3.7 mm for the CLD, 4.3 and 6.9 mm for the ICM, respectively. No significant consequence on the PTV treatments was observed (mean variations: +0.1%, p = 0.56 and −1.8%, p = 0.08 for the breast and the tumor bed, respectively). The ipsilateral lung and heart exposure was not significantly modified. CONCLUSION: In our series, the daily interfraction variations had no significant effect on the PTV coverage or healthy tissue exposure during breast radiotherapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4584980/ /pubmed/26442211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00199 Text en Copyright © 2015 Jacob, Heymann, Borget, Dumas, Riahi, Maroun, Ezra, Roberti, Rivera, Deutsch and Bourgier. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Jacob, Julian Heymann, Steve Borget, Isabelle Dumas, Isabelle Riahi, Elyes Maroun, Pierre Ezra, Patrick Roberti, Elena Rivera, Sofia Deutsch, Eric Bourgier, Céline Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study |
title | Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study |
title_full | Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study |
title_short | Dosimetric Effects of the Interfraction Variations during Whole Breast Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study |
title_sort | dosimetric effects of the interfraction variations during whole breast radiotherapy: a prospective study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4584980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26442211 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobjulian dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT heymannsteve dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT borgetisabelle dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT dumasisabelle dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT riahielyes dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT marounpierre dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT ezrapatrick dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT robertielena dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT riverasofia dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT deutscheric dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy AT bourgierceline dosimetriceffectsoftheinterfractionvariationsduringwholebreastradiotherapyaprospectivestudy |