Cargando…

Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region

The human lutropin (hLH)/choriogonadotropin (hCG) receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) – secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) – produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grzesik, Paul, Kreuchwig, Annika, Rutz, Claudia, Furkert, Jens, Wiesner, Burkhard, Schuelein, Ralf, Kleinau, Gunnar, Gromoll, Joerg, Krause, Gerd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441830
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00140
_version_ 1782392156483223552
author Grzesik, Paul
Kreuchwig, Annika
Rutz, Claudia
Furkert, Jens
Wiesner, Burkhard
Schuelein, Ralf
Kleinau, Gunnar
Gromoll, Joerg
Krause, Gerd
author_facet Grzesik, Paul
Kreuchwig, Annika
Rutz, Claudia
Furkert, Jens
Wiesner, Burkhard
Schuelein, Ralf
Kleinau, Gunnar
Gromoll, Joerg
Krause, Gerd
author_sort Grzesik, Paul
collection PubMed
description The human lutropin (hLH)/choriogonadotropin (hCG) receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) – secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) – produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the LHCGR. This cannot be explained by binding to the receptor’s leucine-rich-repeat domain (LRRD), as this binding is similar for the two hormones. We therefore speculate that there are previously unknown differences in the hormone/receptor interaction at the extracellular hinge region, which might help to understand functional differences between the two hormones. We have therefore performed a detailed study of the binding and action of LH and CG at the LHCGR hinge region. We focused on a primate-specific additional exon in the hinge region, which is located between LRRD and the serpentine domain. The segment of the hinge region encoded by exon10 was previously reported to be only relevant to hLH signaling, as the exon10-deletion receptor exhibits decreased hLH signaling, but unchanged hCG signaling. We designed an advanced homology model of the hormone/LHCGR complex, followed by experimental characterization of relevant fragments in the hinge region. In addition, we examined predictions of a helical exon10-encoded conformation by block-wise polyalanine (helix supporting) mutations. These helix preserving modifications showed no effect on hormone-induced signaling. However, introduction of a structure-disturbing double-proline mutant LHCGR-Q303P/E305P within the exon10-helix has, in contrast to exon10-deletion, no impact on hLH, but only on hCG signaling. This opposite effect on signaling by hLH and hCG can be explained by distinct sites of hormone interaction in the hinge region. In conclusion, our analysis provides details of the differences between hLH- and hCG-induced signaling that are mainly determined in the L2-beta loop of the hormones and in the hinge region of the receptor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4585211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45852112015-10-05 Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region Grzesik, Paul Kreuchwig, Annika Rutz, Claudia Furkert, Jens Wiesner, Burkhard Schuelein, Ralf Kleinau, Gunnar Gromoll, Joerg Krause, Gerd Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology The human lutropin (hLH)/choriogonadotropin (hCG) receptor (LHCGR) can be activated by binding two slightly different gonadotropic glycoprotein hormones, choriogonadotropin (CG) – secreted by the placenta, and lutropin (LH) – produced by the pituitary. They induce different signaling profiles at the LHCGR. This cannot be explained by binding to the receptor’s leucine-rich-repeat domain (LRRD), as this binding is similar for the two hormones. We therefore speculate that there are previously unknown differences in the hormone/receptor interaction at the extracellular hinge region, which might help to understand functional differences between the two hormones. We have therefore performed a detailed study of the binding and action of LH and CG at the LHCGR hinge region. We focused on a primate-specific additional exon in the hinge region, which is located between LRRD and the serpentine domain. The segment of the hinge region encoded by exon10 was previously reported to be only relevant to hLH signaling, as the exon10-deletion receptor exhibits decreased hLH signaling, but unchanged hCG signaling. We designed an advanced homology model of the hormone/LHCGR complex, followed by experimental characterization of relevant fragments in the hinge region. In addition, we examined predictions of a helical exon10-encoded conformation by block-wise polyalanine (helix supporting) mutations. These helix preserving modifications showed no effect on hormone-induced signaling. However, introduction of a structure-disturbing double-proline mutant LHCGR-Q303P/E305P within the exon10-helix has, in contrast to exon10-deletion, no impact on hLH, but only on hCG signaling. This opposite effect on signaling by hLH and hCG can be explained by distinct sites of hormone interaction in the hinge region. In conclusion, our analysis provides details of the differences between hLH- and hCG-induced signaling that are mainly determined in the L2-beta loop of the hormones and in the hinge region of the receptor. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4585211/ /pubmed/26441830 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00140 Text en Copyright © 2015 Grzesik, Kreuchwig, Rutz, Furkert, Wiesner, Schuelein, Kleinau, Gromoll and Krause. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Grzesik, Paul
Kreuchwig, Annika
Rutz, Claudia
Furkert, Jens
Wiesner, Burkhard
Schuelein, Ralf
Kleinau, Gunnar
Gromoll, Joerg
Krause, Gerd
Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region
title Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region
title_full Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region
title_fullStr Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region
title_short Differences in Signal Activation by LH and hCG are Mediated by the LH/CG Receptor’s Extracellular Hinge Region
title_sort differences in signal activation by lh and hcg are mediated by the lh/cg receptor’s extracellular hinge region
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441830
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00140
work_keys_str_mv AT grzesikpaul differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT kreuchwigannika differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT rutzclaudia differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT furkertjens differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT wiesnerburkhard differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT schueleinralf differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT kleinaugunnar differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT gromolljoerg differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion
AT krausegerd differencesinsignalactivationbylhandhcgaremediatedbythelhcgreceptorsextracellularhingeregion