Cargando…
The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior
Green products are appealing. Thus, labeling products as environmentally friendly is an effective strategy to increase sales. However, the labels often promise more than the products can actually deliver. In the present research, we examined the expectation that consumers with high ecological motiva...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392 |
_version_ | 1782392176751149056 |
---|---|
author | Hahnel, Ulf J. J. Arnold, Oliver Waschto, Michael Korcaj, Liridon Hillmann, Karen Roser, Damaris Spada, Hans |
author_facet | Hahnel, Ulf J. J. Arnold, Oliver Waschto, Michael Korcaj, Liridon Hillmann, Karen Roser, Damaris Spada, Hans |
author_sort | Hahnel, Ulf J. J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Green products are appealing. Thus, labeling products as environmentally friendly is an effective strategy to increase sales. However, the labels often promise more than the products can actually deliver. In the present research, we examined the expectation that consumers with high ecological motivation have strong preferences for green-labeled products – even when presented product information contradicts the label’s image. This unsettling hypothesis is grounded in the labels’ potential to create a cognitive match between the labeled product and consumers’ motives. For labels indicating environmental friendliness (green product labels), this link should be strongest when consumers’ ecological motivation is high. Findings in a series of three experiments support our assumption, showing that consumers with high ecological motivation had strong preferences (i.e., product evaluations, purchase intentions, and simulated purchase decisions) for green-labeled products as compared to consumers with low ecological motivation (Studies 1–3). Crucially, these preferences were robust, despite contradicting environmental product information (Studies 1 and 2). We extended our findings by additionally examining the impact of product labels and motivation on moral self-regulation processes. This was established by assessing participants’ pro-social behavior after the purchase task: participants with high ecological motivation acted, consistent with their motives, more pro-socially in post-decision occasions. In accordance with moral cleansing effects, pro-social behavior was intensified after purchasing conventional products (Studies 2 and 3). Green labels protected participants with high ecological motivation from moral threats due to the purchase, thus making pro-social behavior less likely. Findings suggest that highly ecologically motivated consumers are most susceptible to green labels, which may override detailed product information. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4585300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45853002015-10-05 The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior Hahnel, Ulf J. J. Arnold, Oliver Waschto, Michael Korcaj, Liridon Hillmann, Karen Roser, Damaris Spada, Hans Front Psychol Psychology Green products are appealing. Thus, labeling products as environmentally friendly is an effective strategy to increase sales. However, the labels often promise more than the products can actually deliver. In the present research, we examined the expectation that consumers with high ecological motivation have strong preferences for green-labeled products – even when presented product information contradicts the label’s image. This unsettling hypothesis is grounded in the labels’ potential to create a cognitive match between the labeled product and consumers’ motives. For labels indicating environmental friendliness (green product labels), this link should be strongest when consumers’ ecological motivation is high. Findings in a series of three experiments support our assumption, showing that consumers with high ecological motivation had strong preferences (i.e., product evaluations, purchase intentions, and simulated purchase decisions) for green-labeled products as compared to consumers with low ecological motivation (Studies 1–3). Crucially, these preferences were robust, despite contradicting environmental product information (Studies 1 and 2). We extended our findings by additionally examining the impact of product labels and motivation on moral self-regulation processes. This was established by assessing participants’ pro-social behavior after the purchase task: participants with high ecological motivation acted, consistent with their motives, more pro-socially in post-decision occasions. In accordance with moral cleansing effects, pro-social behavior was intensified after purchasing conventional products (Studies 2 and 3). Green labels protected participants with high ecological motivation from moral threats due to the purchase, thus making pro-social behavior less likely. Findings suggest that highly ecologically motivated consumers are most susceptible to green labels, which may override detailed product information. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4585300/ /pubmed/26441767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392 Text en Copyright © 2015 Hahnel, Arnold, Waschto, Korcaj, Hillmann, Roser and Spada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hahnel, Ulf J. J. Arnold, Oliver Waschto, Michael Korcaj, Liridon Hillmann, Karen Roser, Damaris Spada, Hans The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
title | The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
title_full | The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
title_fullStr | The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
title_full_unstemmed | The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
title_short | The power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
title_sort | power of putting a label on it: green labels weigh heavier than contradicting product information for consumers’ purchase decisions and post-purchase behavior |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26441767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hahnelulfjj thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT arnoldoliver thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT waschtomichael thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT korcajliridon thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT hillmannkaren thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT roserdamaris thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT spadahans thepowerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT hahnelulfjj powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT arnoldoliver powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT waschtomichael powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT korcajliridon powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT hillmannkaren powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT roserdamaris powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior AT spadahans powerofputtingalabelonitgreenlabelsweighheavierthancontradictingproductinformationforconsumerspurchasedecisionsandpostpurchasebehavior |