Cargando…

Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces

Quick non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is important for studying phenotypes related to plant growth and stress resistance. This study was undertaken to investigate the quantitative relationship between LCC and different vegetation indices (VIs) on both adaxial and abaxial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Shan, Lu, Xingtong, Zhao, Wenli, Liu, Yu, Wang, Zheyi, Omasa, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv270
_version_ 1782392203036852224
author Lu, Shan
Lu, Xingtong
Zhao, Wenli
Liu, Yu
Wang, Zheyi
Omasa, Kenji
author_facet Lu, Shan
Lu, Xingtong
Zhao, Wenli
Liu, Yu
Wang, Zheyi
Omasa, Kenji
author_sort Lu, Shan
collection PubMed
description Quick non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is important for studying phenotypes related to plant growth and stress resistance. This study was undertaken to investigate the quantitative relationship between LCC and different vegetation indices (VIs) on both adaxial and abaxial surfaces of white poplar (Populus alba), which has dense tubular hairs on its abaxial surface, and Chinese elm (Ulmus pumila var. pendula), which does not show obvious superficial differences except for lighter colour on the abaxial surface. Some published and newly developed VIs were tested to relate them to LCC. The results showed that most of the published VIs had strong relationships with LCC on the one-surface dataset, but did not show a clear relationship with LCC when both adaxial and abaxial surface reflectance data were included. Among the reflectance indices tested, the modified Datt index, (R (719)−R (726))/(R (719)−R (743)), performed best and is proposed as a new index for remote estimation of chlorophyll content in plants with varying leaf surface structures. It explained 92% of LCC variation in this research, and the root mean square error of the LCC prediction was 5.23 μg/cm(2). This new index is insensitive to the effects of adaxial and abaxial leaf surface structures and is strongly related to the variation in reflectance caused by chlorophyll content.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4585420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45854202015-09-29 Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces Lu, Shan Lu, Xingtong Zhao, Wenli Liu, Yu Wang, Zheyi Omasa, Kenji J Exp Bot Research Paper Quick non-destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll content (LCC) is important for studying phenotypes related to plant growth and stress resistance. This study was undertaken to investigate the quantitative relationship between LCC and different vegetation indices (VIs) on both adaxial and abaxial surfaces of white poplar (Populus alba), which has dense tubular hairs on its abaxial surface, and Chinese elm (Ulmus pumila var. pendula), which does not show obvious superficial differences except for lighter colour on the abaxial surface. Some published and newly developed VIs were tested to relate them to LCC. The results showed that most of the published VIs had strong relationships with LCC on the one-surface dataset, but did not show a clear relationship with LCC when both adaxial and abaxial surface reflectance data were included. Among the reflectance indices tested, the modified Datt index, (R (719)−R (726))/(R (719)−R (743)), performed best and is proposed as a new index for remote estimation of chlorophyll content in plants with varying leaf surface structures. It explained 92% of LCC variation in this research, and the root mean square error of the LCC prediction was 5.23 μg/cm(2). This new index is insensitive to the effects of adaxial and abaxial leaf surface structures and is strongly related to the variation in reflectance caused by chlorophyll content. Oxford University Press 2015-09 2015-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4585420/ /pubmed/26034132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv270 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Lu, Shan
Lu, Xingtong
Zhao, Wenli
Liu, Yu
Wang, Zheyi
Omasa, Kenji
Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
title Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
title_full Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
title_fullStr Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
title_full_unstemmed Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
title_short Comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and Chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
title_sort comparing vegetation indices for remote chlorophyll measurement of white poplar and chinese elm leaves with different adaxial and abaxial surfaces
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26034132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv270
work_keys_str_mv AT lushan comparingvegetationindicesforremotechlorophyllmeasurementofwhitepoplarandchineseelmleaveswithdifferentadaxialandabaxialsurfaces
AT luxingtong comparingvegetationindicesforremotechlorophyllmeasurementofwhitepoplarandchineseelmleaveswithdifferentadaxialandabaxialsurfaces
AT zhaowenli comparingvegetationindicesforremotechlorophyllmeasurementofwhitepoplarandchineseelmleaveswithdifferentadaxialandabaxialsurfaces
AT liuyu comparingvegetationindicesforremotechlorophyllmeasurementofwhitepoplarandchineseelmleaveswithdifferentadaxialandabaxialsurfaces
AT wangzheyi comparingvegetationindicesforremotechlorophyllmeasurementofwhitepoplarandchineseelmleaveswithdifferentadaxialandabaxialsurfaces
AT omasakenji comparingvegetationindicesforremotechlorophyllmeasurementofwhitepoplarandchineseelmleaveswithdifferentadaxialandabaxialsurfaces