Cargando…

Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function

Limitation of disturbances, such as grazing and fire, is a key tool for nature reserve management and ecological restoration. While the role of these disturbances in shaping ecosystem structure and functioning has been intensively studied, less is known about the consequences of long-term prevention...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Qiang, Wu, Honghui, Wang, Zhengwen, Flynn, Dan F. B., Yang, Hao, Lü, Fumei, Smith, Melinda, Han, Xingguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26388168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14320
_version_ 1782392253196533760
author Yu, Qiang
Wu, Honghui
Wang, Zhengwen
Flynn, Dan F. B.
Yang, Hao
Lü, Fumei
Smith, Melinda
Han, Xingguo
author_facet Yu, Qiang
Wu, Honghui
Wang, Zhengwen
Flynn, Dan F. B.
Yang, Hao
Lü, Fumei
Smith, Melinda
Han, Xingguo
author_sort Yu, Qiang
collection PubMed
description Limitation of disturbances, such as grazing and fire, is a key tool for nature reserve management and ecological restoration. While the role of these disturbances in shaping ecosystem structure and functioning has been intensively studied, less is known about the consequences of long-term prevention of grazing and fire. Based on a 31-year study, we show that relative biomass of the dominant grass, Leymus chinensis, of grasslands in northern China declined dramatically, but only after 21 years of exclusion of fire and grazing. However, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) did not decline accordingly due to compensatory responses of several subdominant grass species. The decline in dominance of L. chinensis was not related to gradually changing climate during the same period, whereas experimentally imposed litter removal (simulating fire), mowing (simulating grazing), fire and moderate grazing enhanced dominance of L. chinensis significantly. Thus, our findings show that disturbances can be critical to maintain the dominance of key grass species in semiarid grassland, but that the collapse of a dominant species does not necessarily result in significant change in ANPP if there are species in the community capable of compensating for loss of a dominant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4585684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45856842015-09-29 Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function Yu, Qiang Wu, Honghui Wang, Zhengwen Flynn, Dan F. B. Yang, Hao Lü, Fumei Smith, Melinda Han, Xingguo Sci Rep Article Limitation of disturbances, such as grazing and fire, is a key tool for nature reserve management and ecological restoration. While the role of these disturbances in shaping ecosystem structure and functioning has been intensively studied, less is known about the consequences of long-term prevention of grazing and fire. Based on a 31-year study, we show that relative biomass of the dominant grass, Leymus chinensis, of grasslands in northern China declined dramatically, but only after 21 years of exclusion of fire and grazing. However, aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) did not decline accordingly due to compensatory responses of several subdominant grass species. The decline in dominance of L. chinensis was not related to gradually changing climate during the same period, whereas experimentally imposed litter removal (simulating fire), mowing (simulating grazing), fire and moderate grazing enhanced dominance of L. chinensis significantly. Thus, our findings show that disturbances can be critical to maintain the dominance of key grass species in semiarid grassland, but that the collapse of a dominant species does not necessarily result in significant change in ANPP if there are species in the community capable of compensating for loss of a dominant. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4585684/ /pubmed/26388168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14320 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Yu, Qiang
Wu, Honghui
Wang, Zhengwen
Flynn, Dan F. B.
Yang, Hao
Lü, Fumei
Smith, Melinda
Han, Xingguo
Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
title Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
title_full Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
title_fullStr Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
title_full_unstemmed Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
title_short Long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
title_sort long term prevention of disturbance induces the collapse of a dominant species without altering ecosystem function
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26388168
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14320
work_keys_str_mv AT yuqiang longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT wuhonghui longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT wangzhengwen longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT flynndanfb longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT yanghao longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT lufumei longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT smithmelinda longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction
AT hanxingguo longtermpreventionofdisturbanceinducesthecollapseofadominantspecieswithoutalteringecosystemfunction