Cargando…
Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential proce...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14169 |
_version_ | 1782392266532323328 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Shuo Uono, Shota Yoshimura, Sayaka Toichi, Motomi |
author_facet | Zhao, Shuo Uono, Shota Yoshimura, Sayaka Toichi, Motomi |
author_sort | Zhao, Shuo |
collection | PubMed |
description | For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential processing. To investigate this possibility, we trained participants to associate two cues (a red and green arrow in Experiment 1A and two different faces in Experiment 1B) with distinct words (“self” and “other”). Then, we manipulated two types of sound (voice and tone) as targets to investigate whether the cueing effect to self- and other-referential cues differs in a manner similar to that reported for gaze and arrows. We found that self-, but not other-, referential cues induced an enhanced cueing effect to the voice target relative to the tone target regardless of the cue characteristic (i.e., biological or non-biological). Our results suggest that the difference between gaze and arrows in orienting attention can be explained, at least in part, by the self-referentiality of gaze. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we found a reverse cueing pattern between gaze and arrow cues by manipulating subjects’ experiences, suggesting that differences in the self-referentiality of gaze and arrow cues are not inherent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4585743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45857432015-09-29 Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting Zhao, Shuo Uono, Shota Yoshimura, Sayaka Toichi, Motomi Sci Rep Article For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential processing. To investigate this possibility, we trained participants to associate two cues (a red and green arrow in Experiment 1A and two different faces in Experiment 1B) with distinct words (“self” and “other”). Then, we manipulated two types of sound (voice and tone) as targets to investigate whether the cueing effect to self- and other-referential cues differs in a manner similar to that reported for gaze and arrows. We found that self-, but not other-, referential cues induced an enhanced cueing effect to the voice target relative to the tone target regardless of the cue characteristic (i.e., biological or non-biological). Our results suggest that the difference between gaze and arrows in orienting attention can be explained, at least in part, by the self-referentiality of gaze. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we found a reverse cueing pattern between gaze and arrow cues by manipulating subjects’ experiences, suggesting that differences in the self-referentiality of gaze and arrow cues are not inherent. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4585743/ /pubmed/26391177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14169 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Zhao, Shuo Uono, Shota Yoshimura, Sayaka Toichi, Motomi Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
title | Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
title_full | Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
title_fullStr | Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
title_full_unstemmed | Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
title_short | Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
title_sort | self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoshuo selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting AT uonoshota selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting AT yoshimurasayaka selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting AT toichimotomi selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting |