Cargando…

Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting

For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential proce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Shuo, Uono, Shota, Yoshimura, Sayaka, Toichi, Motomi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14169
_version_ 1782392266532323328
author Zhao, Shuo
Uono, Shota
Yoshimura, Sayaka
Toichi, Motomi
author_facet Zhao, Shuo
Uono, Shota
Yoshimura, Sayaka
Toichi, Motomi
author_sort Zhao, Shuo
collection PubMed
description For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential processing. To investigate this possibility, we trained participants to associate two cues (a red and green arrow in Experiment 1A and two different faces in Experiment 1B) with distinct words (“self” and “other”). Then, we manipulated two types of sound (voice and tone) as targets to investigate whether the cueing effect to self- and other-referential cues differs in a manner similar to that reported for gaze and arrows. We found that self-, but not other-, referential cues induced an enhanced cueing effect to the voice target relative to the tone target regardless of the cue characteristic (i.e., biological or non-biological). Our results suggest that the difference between gaze and arrows in orienting attention can be explained, at least in part, by the self-referentiality of gaze. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we found a reverse cueing pattern between gaze and arrow cues by manipulating subjects’ experiences, suggesting that differences in the self-referentiality of gaze and arrow cues are not inherent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4585743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45857432015-09-29 Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting Zhao, Shuo Uono, Shota Yoshimura, Sayaka Toichi, Motomi Sci Rep Article For humans, both eye gaze and arrows serve as powerful signals for orienting attention. Recent studies have shown important differences between gaze and arrows in attention orienting; however, the mechanisms underlying these differences are not known. One such mechanism may be self-referential processing. To investigate this possibility, we trained participants to associate two cues (a red and green arrow in Experiment 1A and two different faces in Experiment 1B) with distinct words (“self” and “other”). Then, we manipulated two types of sound (voice and tone) as targets to investigate whether the cueing effect to self- and other-referential cues differs in a manner similar to that reported for gaze and arrows. We found that self-, but not other-, referential cues induced an enhanced cueing effect to the voice target relative to the tone target regardless of the cue characteristic (i.e., biological or non-biological). Our results suggest that the difference between gaze and arrows in orienting attention can be explained, at least in part, by the self-referentiality of gaze. Furthermore, in Experiment 2, we found a reverse cueing pattern between gaze and arrow cues by manipulating subjects’ experiences, suggesting that differences in the self-referentiality of gaze and arrow cues are not inherent. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4585743/ /pubmed/26391177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14169 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Zhao, Shuo
Uono, Shota
Yoshimura, Sayaka
Toichi, Motomi
Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
title Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
title_full Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
title_fullStr Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
title_full_unstemmed Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
title_short Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
title_sort self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14169
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoshuo selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting
AT uonoshota selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting
AT yoshimurasayaka selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting
AT toichimotomi selfmakeuptheinfluenceofselfreferentialprocessingonattentionorienting