Cargando…
Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compoun...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14059 |
_version_ | 1782392271262449664 |
---|---|
author | Scheidler, Nicole H. Liu, Cheng Hamby, Kelly A. Zalom, Frank G. Syed, Zainulabeuddin |
author_facet | Scheidler, Nicole H. Liu, Cheng Hamby, Kelly A. Zalom, Frank G. Syed, Zainulabeuddin |
author_sort | Scheidler, Nicole H. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from the yeasts. Thus, it remained an exciting avenue to study whether fly spp. detect and discriminate yeast strains based on odor alone, and if so, how such resolution is achieved by the olfactory system in flies. We used two fly species known to exploit different niches and harboring different yeasts, D. suzukii (a pest of fresh fruit) and D. melanogaster (a saprophytic fly and a neurogenetic model organism). We initially established the behavioral preference of both fly species to six Drosophila-associated yeasts; then chemically analyzed the VOC profile of each yeast which revealed quantitative and qualitative differences; and finally isolated and identified the physiologically active constituents from yeast VOCs for each drosophilid that potentially define attraction. By employing chemical, behavioral, and electrophysiological analyses, we provide a comprehensive portrait of the olfactory neuroethological correlates underlying fly-yeast coadaptation in two drosophilids with distinct habitats. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4585764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45857642015-09-29 Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication Scheidler, Nicole H. Liu, Cheng Hamby, Kelly A. Zalom, Frank G. Syed, Zainulabeuddin Sci Rep Article Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from the yeasts. Thus, it remained an exciting avenue to study whether fly spp. detect and discriminate yeast strains based on odor alone, and if so, how such resolution is achieved by the olfactory system in flies. We used two fly species known to exploit different niches and harboring different yeasts, D. suzukii (a pest of fresh fruit) and D. melanogaster (a saprophytic fly and a neurogenetic model organism). We initially established the behavioral preference of both fly species to six Drosophila-associated yeasts; then chemically analyzed the VOC profile of each yeast which revealed quantitative and qualitative differences; and finally isolated and identified the physiologically active constituents from yeast VOCs for each drosophilid that potentially define attraction. By employing chemical, behavioral, and electrophysiological analyses, we provide a comprehensive portrait of the olfactory neuroethological correlates underlying fly-yeast coadaptation in two drosophilids with distinct habitats. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4585764/ /pubmed/26391997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14059 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Scheidler, Nicole H. Liu, Cheng Hamby, Kelly A. Zalom, Frank G. Syed, Zainulabeuddin Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
title | Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
title_full | Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
title_fullStr | Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
title_full_unstemmed | Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
title_short | Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
title_sort | volatile codes: correlation of olfactory signals and reception in drosophila-yeast chemical communication |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scheidlernicoleh volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication AT liucheng volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication AT hambykellya volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication AT zalomfrankg volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication AT syedzainulabeuddin volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication |