Cargando…

Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication

Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compoun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheidler, Nicole H., Liu, Cheng, Hamby, Kelly A., Zalom, Frank G., Syed, Zainulabeuddin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14059
_version_ 1782392271262449664
author Scheidler, Nicole H.
Liu, Cheng
Hamby, Kelly A.
Zalom, Frank G.
Syed, Zainulabeuddin
author_facet Scheidler, Nicole H.
Liu, Cheng
Hamby, Kelly A.
Zalom, Frank G.
Syed, Zainulabeuddin
author_sort Scheidler, Nicole H.
collection PubMed
description Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from the yeasts. Thus, it remained an exciting avenue to study whether fly spp. detect and discriminate yeast strains based on odor alone, and if so, how such resolution is achieved by the olfactory system in flies. We used two fly species known to exploit different niches and harboring different yeasts, D. suzukii (a pest of fresh fruit) and D. melanogaster (a saprophytic fly and a neurogenetic model organism). We initially established the behavioral preference of both fly species to six Drosophila-associated yeasts; then chemically analyzed the VOC profile of each yeast which revealed quantitative and qualitative differences; and finally isolated and identified the physiologically active constituents from yeast VOCs for each drosophilid that potentially define attraction. By employing chemical, behavioral, and electrophysiological analyses, we provide a comprehensive portrait of the olfactory neuroethological correlates underlying fly-yeast coadaptation in two drosophilids with distinct habitats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4585764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45857642015-09-29 Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication Scheidler, Nicole H. Liu, Cheng Hamby, Kelly A. Zalom, Frank G. Syed, Zainulabeuddin Sci Rep Article Drosophila have evolved strong mutualistic associations with yeast communities that best support their growth and survival, resulting in the development of novel niches. It has been suggested that flies recognize their cognate yeasts primarily based on the rich repertoire of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from the yeasts. Thus, it remained an exciting avenue to study whether fly spp. detect and discriminate yeast strains based on odor alone, and if so, how such resolution is achieved by the olfactory system in flies. We used two fly species known to exploit different niches and harboring different yeasts, D. suzukii (a pest of fresh fruit) and D. melanogaster (a saprophytic fly and a neurogenetic model organism). We initially established the behavioral preference of both fly species to six Drosophila-associated yeasts; then chemically analyzed the VOC profile of each yeast which revealed quantitative and qualitative differences; and finally isolated and identified the physiologically active constituents from yeast VOCs for each drosophilid that potentially define attraction. By employing chemical, behavioral, and electrophysiological analyses, we provide a comprehensive portrait of the olfactory neuroethological correlates underlying fly-yeast coadaptation in two drosophilids with distinct habitats. Nature Publishing Group 2015-09-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4585764/ /pubmed/26391997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14059 Text en Copyright © 2015, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Scheidler, Nicole H.
Liu, Cheng
Hamby, Kelly A.
Zalom, Frank G.
Syed, Zainulabeuddin
Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
title Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
title_full Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
title_fullStr Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
title_full_unstemmed Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
title_short Volatile codes: Correlation of olfactory signals and reception in Drosophila-yeast chemical communication
title_sort volatile codes: correlation of olfactory signals and reception in drosophila-yeast chemical communication
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4585764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26391997
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep14059
work_keys_str_mv AT scheidlernicoleh volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication
AT liucheng volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication
AT hambykellya volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication
AT zalomfrankg volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication
AT syedzainulabeuddin volatilecodescorrelationofolfactorysignalsandreceptionindrosophilayeastchemicalcommunication