Cargando…
Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the “actual” HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921 |
_version_ | 1782392347645968384 |
---|---|
author | Munoz, M. Loretto van Roon, Arie Riese, Harriëtte Thio, Chris Oostenbroek, Emma Westrik, Iris de Geus, Eco J. C. Gansevoort, Ron Lefrandt, Joop Nolte, Ilja M. Snieder, Harold |
author_facet | Munoz, M. Loretto van Roon, Arie Riese, Harriëtte Thio, Chris Oostenbroek, Emma Westrik, Iris de Geus, Eco J. C. Gansevoort, Ron Lefrandt, Joop Nolte, Ilja M. Snieder, Harold |
author_sort | Munoz, M. Loretto |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the “actual” HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were measured in 3,387 adults. SDNN and RMSSD were assessed from (ultra)short recordings of 10s(3x), 30s, and 120s and compared to 240s–300s (gold standard) measurements. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Cohen’s d statistics were used as agreement analysis techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between the separate 10s recordings and the 240s-300s recording was already substantial (r = 0.758–0.764/Bias = 0.398–0.416/d = 0.855–0.894 for SDNN; r = 0.853–0.862/Bias = 0.079–0.096/d = 0.150–0.171 for RMSSD), and improved further when three 10s periods were averaged (r = 0.863/Bias = 0.406/d = 0.874 for SDNN; r = 0.941/Bias = 0.088/d = 0.167 for RMSSD). Agreement increased with recording length and reached near perfect agreement at 120s (r = 0.956/Bias = 0.064/d = 0.137 for SDNN; r = 0.986/Bias = 0.014/d = 0.027 for RMSSD). For all recording lengths and agreement measures, RMSSD outperformed SDNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that it is unnecessary to use recordings longer than 120s to obtain accurate measures of RMSSD and SDNN in the time domain. Even a single 10s (standard ECG) recording yields a valid RMSSD measurement, although an average over multiple 10s ECGs is preferable. For SDNN we would recommend either 30s or multiple 10s ECGs. Future research projects using time-domain HRV parameters, e.g. genetic epidemiological studies, could calculate HRV from (ultra-)short ECGs enabling such projects to be performed at a large scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4586373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45863732015-10-01 Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements Munoz, M. Loretto van Roon, Arie Riese, Harriëtte Thio, Chris Oostenbroek, Emma Westrik, Iris de Geus, Eco J. C. Gansevoort, Ron Lefrandt, Joop Nolte, Ilja M. Snieder, Harold PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the “actual” HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were measured in 3,387 adults. SDNN and RMSSD were assessed from (ultra)short recordings of 10s(3x), 30s, and 120s and compared to 240s–300s (gold standard) measurements. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Cohen’s d statistics were used as agreement analysis techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between the separate 10s recordings and the 240s-300s recording was already substantial (r = 0.758–0.764/Bias = 0.398–0.416/d = 0.855–0.894 for SDNN; r = 0.853–0.862/Bias = 0.079–0.096/d = 0.150–0.171 for RMSSD), and improved further when three 10s periods were averaged (r = 0.863/Bias = 0.406/d = 0.874 for SDNN; r = 0.941/Bias = 0.088/d = 0.167 for RMSSD). Agreement increased with recording length and reached near perfect agreement at 120s (r = 0.956/Bias = 0.064/d = 0.137 for SDNN; r = 0.986/Bias = 0.014/d = 0.027 for RMSSD). For all recording lengths and agreement measures, RMSSD outperformed SDNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that it is unnecessary to use recordings longer than 120s to obtain accurate measures of RMSSD and SDNN in the time domain. Even a single 10s (standard ECG) recording yields a valid RMSSD measurement, although an average over multiple 10s ECGs is preferable. For SDNN we would recommend either 30s or multiple 10s ECGs. Future research projects using time-domain HRV parameters, e.g. genetic epidemiological studies, could calculate HRV from (ultra-)short ECGs enabling such projects to be performed at a large scale. Public Library of Science 2015-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4586373/ /pubmed/26414314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921 Text en © 2015 Munoz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Munoz, M. Loretto van Roon, Arie Riese, Harriëtte Thio, Chris Oostenbroek, Emma Westrik, Iris de Geus, Eco J. C. Gansevoort, Ron Lefrandt, Joop Nolte, Ilja M. Snieder, Harold Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements |
title | Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements |
title_full | Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements |
title_fullStr | Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements |
title_short | Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements |
title_sort | validity of (ultra-)short recordings for heart rate variability measurements |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT munozmloretto validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT vanroonarie validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT rieseharriette validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT thiochris validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT oostenbroekemma validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT westrikiris validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT degeusecojc validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT gansevoortron validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT lefrandtjoop validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT nolteiljam validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements AT sniederharold validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements |