Cargando…

Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements

OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the “actual” HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munoz, M. Loretto, van Roon, Arie, Riese, Harriëtte, Thio, Chris, Oostenbroek, Emma, Westrik, Iris, de Geus, Eco J. C., Gansevoort, Ron, Lefrandt, Joop, Nolte, Ilja M., Snieder, Harold
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921
_version_ 1782392347645968384
author Munoz, M. Loretto
van Roon, Arie
Riese, Harriëtte
Thio, Chris
Oostenbroek, Emma
Westrik, Iris
de Geus, Eco J. C.
Gansevoort, Ron
Lefrandt, Joop
Nolte, Ilja M.
Snieder, Harold
author_facet Munoz, M. Loretto
van Roon, Arie
Riese, Harriëtte
Thio, Chris
Oostenbroek, Emma
Westrik, Iris
de Geus, Eco J. C.
Gansevoort, Ron
Lefrandt, Joop
Nolte, Ilja M.
Snieder, Harold
author_sort Munoz, M. Loretto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the “actual” HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were measured in 3,387 adults. SDNN and RMSSD were assessed from (ultra)short recordings of 10s(3x), 30s, and 120s and compared to 240s–300s (gold standard) measurements. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Cohen’s d statistics were used as agreement analysis techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between the separate 10s recordings and the 240s-300s recording was already substantial (r = 0.758–0.764/Bias = 0.398–0.416/d = 0.855–0.894 for SDNN; r = 0.853–0.862/Bias = 0.079–0.096/d = 0.150–0.171 for RMSSD), and improved further when three 10s periods were averaged (r = 0.863/Bias = 0.406/d = 0.874 for SDNN; r = 0.941/Bias = 0.088/d = 0.167 for RMSSD). Agreement increased with recording length and reached near perfect agreement at 120s (r = 0.956/Bias = 0.064/d = 0.137 for SDNN; r = 0.986/Bias = 0.014/d = 0.027 for RMSSD). For all recording lengths and agreement measures, RMSSD outperformed SDNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that it is unnecessary to use recordings longer than 120s to obtain accurate measures of RMSSD and SDNN in the time domain. Even a single 10s (standard ECG) recording yields a valid RMSSD measurement, although an average over multiple 10s ECGs is preferable. For SDNN we would recommend either 30s or multiple 10s ECGs. Future research projects using time-domain HRV parameters, e.g. genetic epidemiological studies, could calculate HRV from (ultra-)short ECGs enabling such projects to be performed at a large scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4586373
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45863732015-10-01 Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements Munoz, M. Loretto van Roon, Arie Riese, Harriëtte Thio, Chris Oostenbroek, Emma Westrik, Iris de Geus, Eco J. C. Gansevoort, Ron Lefrandt, Joop Nolte, Ilja M. Snieder, Harold PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the “actual” HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were measured in 3,387 adults. SDNN and RMSSD were assessed from (ultra)short recordings of 10s(3x), 30s, and 120s and compared to 240s–300s (gold standard) measurements. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r), Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Cohen’s d statistics were used as agreement analysis techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between the separate 10s recordings and the 240s-300s recording was already substantial (r = 0.758–0.764/Bias = 0.398–0.416/d = 0.855–0.894 for SDNN; r = 0.853–0.862/Bias = 0.079–0.096/d = 0.150–0.171 for RMSSD), and improved further when three 10s periods were averaged (r = 0.863/Bias = 0.406/d = 0.874 for SDNN; r = 0.941/Bias = 0.088/d = 0.167 for RMSSD). Agreement increased with recording length and reached near perfect agreement at 120s (r = 0.956/Bias = 0.064/d = 0.137 for SDNN; r = 0.986/Bias = 0.014/d = 0.027 for RMSSD). For all recording lengths and agreement measures, RMSSD outperformed SDNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that it is unnecessary to use recordings longer than 120s to obtain accurate measures of RMSSD and SDNN in the time domain. Even a single 10s (standard ECG) recording yields a valid RMSSD measurement, although an average over multiple 10s ECGs is preferable. For SDNN we would recommend either 30s or multiple 10s ECGs. Future research projects using time-domain HRV parameters, e.g. genetic epidemiological studies, could calculate HRV from (ultra-)short ECGs enabling such projects to be performed at a large scale. Public Library of Science 2015-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4586373/ /pubmed/26414314 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921 Text en © 2015 Munoz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Munoz, M. Loretto
van Roon, Arie
Riese, Harriëtte
Thio, Chris
Oostenbroek, Emma
Westrik, Iris
de Geus, Eco J. C.
Gansevoort, Ron
Lefrandt, Joop
Nolte, Ilja M.
Snieder, Harold
Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
title Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
title_full Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
title_fullStr Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
title_full_unstemmed Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
title_short Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements
title_sort validity of (ultra-)short recordings for heart rate variability measurements
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586373/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26414314
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921
work_keys_str_mv AT munozmloretto validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT vanroonarie validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT rieseharriette validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT thiochris validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT oostenbroekemma validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT westrikiris validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT degeusecojc validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT gansevoortron validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT lefrandtjoop validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT nolteiljam validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements
AT sniederharold validityofultrashortrecordingsforheartratevariabilitymeasurements