Cargando…

Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments

Dual X-ray and Laser (DXL) adds a measure of the external thickness of the heel, measured by laser, to a conventional measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) of the calcaneus, using Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The addition of heel thickness aims at a better separation of fatty tissue f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lundin, Hans, Torabi, Faramarz, Sääf, Maria, Strender, Lars-Erik, Nyren, Sven, Johansson, Sven-Erik, Salminen, Helena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137535
_version_ 1782392348749070336
author Lundin, Hans
Torabi, Faramarz
Sääf, Maria
Strender, Lars-Erik
Nyren, Sven
Johansson, Sven-Erik
Salminen, Helena
author_facet Lundin, Hans
Torabi, Faramarz
Sääf, Maria
Strender, Lars-Erik
Nyren, Sven
Johansson, Sven-Erik
Salminen, Helena
author_sort Lundin, Hans
collection PubMed
description Dual X-ray and Laser (DXL) adds a measure of the external thickness of the heel, measured by laser, to a conventional measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) of the calcaneus, using Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The addition of heel thickness aims at a better separation of fatty tissue from bone than the standard method of DXA, which may mistake fatty tissue for bone and vice versa. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether DXL of the calcaneus can be used to assess the 10-year risk of fractures. Secondary aims were to compare the predictive ability of DXL with the two most established methods, Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and spine and the WHO fracture risk assessment tool, FRAX. In 1999 a cohort of 388 elderly Swedish women (mean age 73.2 years) was examined with all three methods. Prospective fracture data was collected in 2010 from health care registers. One SD decrease in BMD of the heel resulted in an age-adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.47 for a hip fracture (95% CI 1.09–1.98). Harrell’s C is the Cox regression counterpart of the Area Under Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) as a measure of predictive accuracy. Harrell’s C for BMD of the calcaneus was 0.65 for prediction of hip fractures. These results were not significantly different from those for BMD of the femoral neck or for FRAX. The HR for a hip fracture, for one SD decrease in BMD at the femoral neck, was 1.72 (95% CI 1.21–2.44. Harrell’s C was 0.67 for BMD at the femoral neck and 0.59 for FRAX. We conclude that DXL of the calcaneus could be a useful tool for fracture risk assessments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4586378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45863782015-10-01 Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments Lundin, Hans Torabi, Faramarz Sääf, Maria Strender, Lars-Erik Nyren, Sven Johansson, Sven-Erik Salminen, Helena PLoS One Research Article Dual X-ray and Laser (DXL) adds a measure of the external thickness of the heel, measured by laser, to a conventional measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) of the calcaneus, using Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA). The addition of heel thickness aims at a better separation of fatty tissue from bone than the standard method of DXA, which may mistake fatty tissue for bone and vice versa. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate whether DXL of the calcaneus can be used to assess the 10-year risk of fractures. Secondary aims were to compare the predictive ability of DXL with the two most established methods, Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) of the hip and spine and the WHO fracture risk assessment tool, FRAX. In 1999 a cohort of 388 elderly Swedish women (mean age 73.2 years) was examined with all three methods. Prospective fracture data was collected in 2010 from health care registers. One SD decrease in BMD of the heel resulted in an age-adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.47 for a hip fracture (95% CI 1.09–1.98). Harrell’s C is the Cox regression counterpart of the Area Under Curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) as a measure of predictive accuracy. Harrell’s C for BMD of the calcaneus was 0.65 for prediction of hip fractures. These results were not significantly different from those for BMD of the femoral neck or for FRAX. The HR for a hip fracture, for one SD decrease in BMD at the femoral neck, was 1.72 (95% CI 1.21–2.44. Harrell’s C was 0.67 for BMD at the femoral neck and 0.59 for FRAX. We conclude that DXL of the calcaneus could be a useful tool for fracture risk assessments. Public Library of Science 2015-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4586378/ /pubmed/26413715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137535 Text en © 2015 Lundin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lundin, Hans
Torabi, Faramarz
Sääf, Maria
Strender, Lars-Erik
Nyren, Sven
Johansson, Sven-Erik
Salminen, Helena
Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments
title Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments
title_full Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments
title_fullStr Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments
title_short Laser-Supported Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXL) Compared to Conventional Absorptiometry (DXA) and to FRAX as Tools for Fracture Risk Assessments
title_sort laser-supported dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (dxl) compared to conventional absorptiometry (dxa) and to frax as tools for fracture risk assessments
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0137535
work_keys_str_mv AT lundinhans lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments
AT torabifaramarz lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments
AT saafmaria lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments
AT strenderlarserik lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments
AT nyrensven lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments
AT johanssonsvenerik lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments
AT salminenhelena lasersupporteddualenergyxrayabsorptiometrydxlcomparedtoconventionalabsorptiometrydxaandtofraxastoolsforfractureriskassessments