Cargando…

Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability

Fire blight (FB), caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important pome fruit pathogens worldwide. To control this devastating disease, various chemical and biological treatments are commonly applied in Switzerland, but they fail to keep the infection at an acceptable level in years of heav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gusberti, Michele, Klemm, Urs, Meier, Matthias S., Maurhofer, Monika, Hunger-Glaser, Isabel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911422
_version_ 1782392412498296832
author Gusberti, Michele
Klemm, Urs
Meier, Matthias S.
Maurhofer, Monika
Hunger-Glaser, Isabel
author_facet Gusberti, Michele
Klemm, Urs
Meier, Matthias S.
Maurhofer, Monika
Hunger-Glaser, Isabel
author_sort Gusberti, Michele
collection PubMed
description Fire blight (FB), caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important pome fruit pathogens worldwide. To control this devastating disease, various chemical and biological treatments are commonly applied in Switzerland, but they fail to keep the infection at an acceptable level in years of heavy disease pressure. The Swiss authorities therefore currently allow the controlled use of the antibiotic streptomycin against FB in years that are predicted to have heavy infection periods, but only one treatment per season is permitted. Another strategy for controlling Erwinia is to breed resistant/tolerant apple cultivars. One way of accelerating the breeding process is to obtain resistant cultivars by inserting one or several major resistance genes, using genetic engineering. To date, no study summarizing the impact of different FB control measures on the environment and on human health has been performed. This study consequently aims to compare different disease-control measures (biological control, chemical control, control by antibiotics and by resistant/tolerant apple cultivars obtained through conventional or molecular breeding) applied against E. amylovora, considering different protection goals (protection of human health, environment, agricultural diversity and economic interest), with special emphasis on biosafety aspects. Information on each FB control measure in relation to the specified protection goal was assessed by literature searches and by interviews with experts. Based on our results it can be concluded that the FB control measures currently applied in Switzerland are safe for consumers, workers and the environment. However, there are several gaps in our knowledge of the human health and environmental impacts analyzed: data are missing (1) on long term studies on the efficacy of most of the analyzed FB control measures; (2) on the safety of operators handling streptomycin; (3) on residue analyses of Equisetum plant extract, the copper and aluminum compounds used in apple production; and (4) on the effect of biological and chemical control measures on non-target fauna and flora. These gaps urgently need to be addressed in the near future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4586684
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45866842015-10-06 Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability Gusberti, Michele Klemm, Urs Meier, Matthias S. Maurhofer, Monika Hunger-Glaser, Isabel Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Fire blight (FB), caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important pome fruit pathogens worldwide. To control this devastating disease, various chemical and biological treatments are commonly applied in Switzerland, but they fail to keep the infection at an acceptable level in years of heavy disease pressure. The Swiss authorities therefore currently allow the controlled use of the antibiotic streptomycin against FB in years that are predicted to have heavy infection periods, but only one treatment per season is permitted. Another strategy for controlling Erwinia is to breed resistant/tolerant apple cultivars. One way of accelerating the breeding process is to obtain resistant cultivars by inserting one or several major resistance genes, using genetic engineering. To date, no study summarizing the impact of different FB control measures on the environment and on human health has been performed. This study consequently aims to compare different disease-control measures (biological control, chemical control, control by antibiotics and by resistant/tolerant apple cultivars obtained through conventional or molecular breeding) applied against E. amylovora, considering different protection goals (protection of human health, environment, agricultural diversity and economic interest), with special emphasis on biosafety aspects. Information on each FB control measure in relation to the specified protection goal was assessed by literature searches and by interviews with experts. Based on our results it can be concluded that the FB control measures currently applied in Switzerland are safe for consumers, workers and the environment. However, there are several gaps in our knowledge of the human health and environmental impacts analyzed: data are missing (1) on long term studies on the efficacy of most of the analyzed FB control measures; (2) on the safety of operators handling streptomycin; (3) on residue analyses of Equisetum plant extract, the copper and aluminum compounds used in apple production; and (4) on the effect of biological and chemical control measures on non-target fauna and flora. These gaps urgently need to be addressed in the near future. MDPI 2015-09-11 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4586684/ /pubmed/26378562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911422 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Gusberti, Michele
Klemm, Urs
Meier, Matthias S.
Maurhofer, Monika
Hunger-Glaser, Isabel
Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
title Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
title_full Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
title_fullStr Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
title_full_unstemmed Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
title_short Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
title_sort fire blight control: the struggle goes on. a comparison of different fire blight control methods in switzerland with respect to biosafety, efficacy and durability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586684/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378562
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911422
work_keys_str_mv AT gusbertimichele fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability
AT klemmurs fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability
AT meiermatthiass fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability
AT maurhofermonika fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability
AT hungerglaserisabel fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability