Cargando…
Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability
Fire blight (FB), caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important pome fruit pathogens worldwide. To control this devastating disease, various chemical and biological treatments are commonly applied in Switzerland, but they fail to keep the infection at an acceptable level in years of heav...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911422 |
_version_ | 1782392412498296832 |
---|---|
author | Gusberti, Michele Klemm, Urs Meier, Matthias S. Maurhofer, Monika Hunger-Glaser, Isabel |
author_facet | Gusberti, Michele Klemm, Urs Meier, Matthias S. Maurhofer, Monika Hunger-Glaser, Isabel |
author_sort | Gusberti, Michele |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fire blight (FB), caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important pome fruit pathogens worldwide. To control this devastating disease, various chemical and biological treatments are commonly applied in Switzerland, but they fail to keep the infection at an acceptable level in years of heavy disease pressure. The Swiss authorities therefore currently allow the controlled use of the antibiotic streptomycin against FB in years that are predicted to have heavy infection periods, but only one treatment per season is permitted. Another strategy for controlling Erwinia is to breed resistant/tolerant apple cultivars. One way of accelerating the breeding process is to obtain resistant cultivars by inserting one or several major resistance genes, using genetic engineering. To date, no study summarizing the impact of different FB control measures on the environment and on human health has been performed. This study consequently aims to compare different disease-control measures (biological control, chemical control, control by antibiotics and by resistant/tolerant apple cultivars obtained through conventional or molecular breeding) applied against E. amylovora, considering different protection goals (protection of human health, environment, agricultural diversity and economic interest), with special emphasis on biosafety aspects. Information on each FB control measure in relation to the specified protection goal was assessed by literature searches and by interviews with experts. Based on our results it can be concluded that the FB control measures currently applied in Switzerland are safe for consumers, workers and the environment. However, there are several gaps in our knowledge of the human health and environmental impacts analyzed: data are missing (1) on long term studies on the efficacy of most of the analyzed FB control measures; (2) on the safety of operators handling streptomycin; (3) on residue analyses of Equisetum plant extract, the copper and aluminum compounds used in apple production; and (4) on the effect of biological and chemical control measures on non-target fauna and flora. These gaps urgently need to be addressed in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4586684 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45866842015-10-06 Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability Gusberti, Michele Klemm, Urs Meier, Matthias S. Maurhofer, Monika Hunger-Glaser, Isabel Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Fire blight (FB), caused by Erwinia amylovora, is one of the most important pome fruit pathogens worldwide. To control this devastating disease, various chemical and biological treatments are commonly applied in Switzerland, but they fail to keep the infection at an acceptable level in years of heavy disease pressure. The Swiss authorities therefore currently allow the controlled use of the antibiotic streptomycin against FB in years that are predicted to have heavy infection periods, but only one treatment per season is permitted. Another strategy for controlling Erwinia is to breed resistant/tolerant apple cultivars. One way of accelerating the breeding process is to obtain resistant cultivars by inserting one or several major resistance genes, using genetic engineering. To date, no study summarizing the impact of different FB control measures on the environment and on human health has been performed. This study consequently aims to compare different disease-control measures (biological control, chemical control, control by antibiotics and by resistant/tolerant apple cultivars obtained through conventional or molecular breeding) applied against E. amylovora, considering different protection goals (protection of human health, environment, agricultural diversity and economic interest), with special emphasis on biosafety aspects. Information on each FB control measure in relation to the specified protection goal was assessed by literature searches and by interviews with experts. Based on our results it can be concluded that the FB control measures currently applied in Switzerland are safe for consumers, workers and the environment. However, there are several gaps in our knowledge of the human health and environmental impacts analyzed: data are missing (1) on long term studies on the efficacy of most of the analyzed FB control measures; (2) on the safety of operators handling streptomycin; (3) on residue analyses of Equisetum plant extract, the copper and aluminum compounds used in apple production; and (4) on the effect of biological and chemical control measures on non-target fauna and flora. These gaps urgently need to be addressed in the near future. MDPI 2015-09-11 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4586684/ /pubmed/26378562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911422 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Gusberti, Michele Klemm, Urs Meier, Matthias S. Maurhofer, Monika Hunger-Glaser, Isabel Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability |
title | Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability |
title_full | Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability |
title_fullStr | Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability |
title_full_unstemmed | Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability |
title_short | Fire Blight Control: The Struggle Goes On. A Comparison of Different Fire Blight Control Methods in Switzerland with Respect to Biosafety, Efficacy and Durability |
title_sort | fire blight control: the struggle goes on. a comparison of different fire blight control methods in switzerland with respect to biosafety, efficacy and durability |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4586684/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378562 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120911422 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gusbertimichele fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability AT klemmurs fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability AT meiermatthiass fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability AT maurhofermonika fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability AT hungerglaserisabel fireblightcontrolthestrugglegoesonacomparisonofdifferentfireblightcontrolmethodsinswitzerlandwithrespecttobiosafetyefficacyanddurability |