Cargando…

Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Programs to change health behaviours have been identified as one way to reduce health inequalities experienced by disadvantaged groups. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a behaviour change programme to increase walking and reduce sedentary behaviour of adult...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melville, Craig A., Mitchell, Fiona, Stalker, Kirsten, Matthews, Lynsay, McConnachie, Alex, Murray, Heather M., Melling, Chris, Mutrie, Nanette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0290-5
_version_ 1782392489949265920
author Melville, Craig A.
Mitchell, Fiona
Stalker, Kirsten
Matthews, Lynsay
McConnachie, Alex
Murray, Heather M.
Melling, Chris
Mutrie, Nanette
author_facet Melville, Craig A.
Mitchell, Fiona
Stalker, Kirsten
Matthews, Lynsay
McConnachie, Alex
Murray, Heather M.
Melling, Chris
Mutrie, Nanette
author_sort Melville, Craig A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Programs to change health behaviours have been identified as one way to reduce health inequalities experienced by disadvantaged groups. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a behaviour change programme to increase walking and reduce sedentary behaviour of adults with intellectual disabilities. METHODS: We used a cluster randomised controlled design and recruited participants over 18 years old and not regularly involved in physical activity from intellectual disabilities community-based organisations. Assessments were carried out blind to allocation. Clusters of participants were randomly allocated to the Walk Well program or a 12-week waiting list control. Walk Well consisted of three face-to-face physical activity consultations incorporating behaviour change techniques, written resources for participants and carers, and an individualised, structured walking programme. The primary outcome measured with accelerometers was change in mean step count per day between baseline and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included percentage time per day sedentary and in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), body mass index (BMI), and subjective well being. RESULTS: One hundred two participants in 50 clusters were randomised. 82 (80.4 %) participants completed the primary outcome. 66.7 % of participants lived in the most deprived quintile on the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. At baseline, participants walked 4780 (standard deviation 2432) steps per day, spent 65.5 % (standard deviation 10.9) of time sedentary and 59 % percent had a body mass in the obesity range. After the walking programme, the difference between mean counts of the Walk Well and control group was 69.5 steps per day [95 % confidence interval (CI) -1054 to 1193.3]. There were no significant between group differences in percentage time sedentary 1.6 % (95 % CI −2.984 to 6.102), percentage time in MVPA 0.3 % (95 % CI −0.7 to 1.3), BMI −0.2 kg/m(2) (95 % CI −0.8 to 0.4) or subjective well-being 0.3 (95 % CI −0.9 to 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published trial of a walking program for adults with intellectual disabilities. Positively changing physical activity and sedentary behaviours may require more intensive programmes or upstream approaches to address the multiple social disadvantages experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities. Since participants spent the majority of their time sedentary, home-based programmes to reduce sitting time may be a viable health improvement approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50494254 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0290-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4587575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45875752015-09-30 Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial Melville, Craig A. Mitchell, Fiona Stalker, Kirsten Matthews, Lynsay McConnachie, Alex Murray, Heather M. Melling, Chris Mutrie, Nanette Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Research BACKGROUND: Programs to change health behaviours have been identified as one way to reduce health inequalities experienced by disadvantaged groups. The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness of a behaviour change programme to increase walking and reduce sedentary behaviour of adults with intellectual disabilities. METHODS: We used a cluster randomised controlled design and recruited participants over 18 years old and not regularly involved in physical activity from intellectual disabilities community-based organisations. Assessments were carried out blind to allocation. Clusters of participants were randomly allocated to the Walk Well program or a 12-week waiting list control. Walk Well consisted of three face-to-face physical activity consultations incorporating behaviour change techniques, written resources for participants and carers, and an individualised, structured walking programme. The primary outcome measured with accelerometers was change in mean step count per day between baseline and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included percentage time per day sedentary and in moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), body mass index (BMI), and subjective well being. RESULTS: One hundred two participants in 50 clusters were randomised. 82 (80.4 %) participants completed the primary outcome. 66.7 % of participants lived in the most deprived quintile on the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation. At baseline, participants walked 4780 (standard deviation 2432) steps per day, spent 65.5 % (standard deviation 10.9) of time sedentary and 59 % percent had a body mass in the obesity range. After the walking programme, the difference between mean counts of the Walk Well and control group was 69.5 steps per day [95 % confidence interval (CI) -1054 to 1193.3]. There were no significant between group differences in percentage time sedentary 1.6 % (95 % CI −2.984 to 6.102), percentage time in MVPA 0.3 % (95 % CI −0.7 to 1.3), BMI −0.2 kg/m(2) (95 % CI −0.8 to 0.4) or subjective well-being 0.3 (95 % CI −0.9 to 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first published trial of a walking program for adults with intellectual disabilities. Positively changing physical activity and sedentary behaviours may require more intensive programmes or upstream approaches to address the multiple social disadvantages experienced by adults with intellectual disabilities. Since participants spent the majority of their time sedentary, home-based programmes to reduce sitting time may be a viable health improvement approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50494254 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0290-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4587575/ /pubmed/26416606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0290-5 Text en © Melville et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Melville, Craig A.
Mitchell, Fiona
Stalker, Kirsten
Matthews, Lynsay
McConnachie, Alex
Murray, Heather M.
Melling, Chris
Mutrie, Nanette
Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of a walking programme to support adults with intellectual disabilities to increase physical activity: walk well cluster-randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0290-5
work_keys_str_mv AT melvillecraiga effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitchellfiona effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT stalkerkirsten effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT matthewslynsay effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcconnachiealex effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT murrayheatherm effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mellingchris effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mutrienanette effectivenessofawalkingprogrammetosupportadultswithintellectualdisabilitiestoincreasephysicalactivitywalkwellclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrial