Cargando…
Better prioritization to increase research value and decrease waste
In a recent study published in BMC Medicine, Singh Ospina and colleagues outlined the important gaps between ongoing research and research needs in the field of endocrinology. Many recommendations from clinical practice guidelines are based on a low level of evidence, thereby resulting in research g...
Autores principales: | Dechartres, Agnes, Ravaud, Philippe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0492-3 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Avoidable waste of research related to inadequate methods in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Avoidable waste of research related to outcome planning and reporting in clinical trials
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Disagreements in risk of bias assessment for randomised controlled trials included in more than one Cochrane systematic reviews: a research on research study using cross-sectional design
por: Bertizzolo, Lorenzo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Patient-important outcomes in systematic reviews: Poor quality of evidence
por: Yordanov, Youri, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Value of Information: A Tool to Improve Research Prioritization and Reduce Waste
por: Minelli, Cosetta, et al.
Publicado: (2015)