Cargando…
The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report
The only currently available drug that effectively removes malaria hypnozoites from the human host is primaquine. The use of 8-aminoquinolines is hampered by haemolytic side effects in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient individuals. Recently a number of qualitative and a quantitative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0896-8 |
_version_ | 1782392508642230272 |
---|---|
author | Ley, Benedikt Luter, Nick Espino, Fe Esperanza Devine, Angela Kalnoky, Michael Lubell, Yoel Thriemer, Kamala Baird, J. Kevin Poirot, Eugenie Conan, Nolwenn Kheong, Chong Chee Dysoley, Lek Khan, Wasif Ali Dion-Berboso, April G. Bancone, Germana Hwang, Jimee Kumar, Ritu Price, Ric N. von Seidlein, Lorenz Domingo, Gonzalo J. |
author_facet | Ley, Benedikt Luter, Nick Espino, Fe Esperanza Devine, Angela Kalnoky, Michael Lubell, Yoel Thriemer, Kamala Baird, J. Kevin Poirot, Eugenie Conan, Nolwenn Kheong, Chong Chee Dysoley, Lek Khan, Wasif Ali Dion-Berboso, April G. Bancone, Germana Hwang, Jimee Kumar, Ritu Price, Ric N. von Seidlein, Lorenz Domingo, Gonzalo J. |
author_sort | Ley, Benedikt |
collection | PubMed |
description | The only currently available drug that effectively removes malaria hypnozoites from the human host is primaquine. The use of 8-aminoquinolines is hampered by haemolytic side effects in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient individuals. Recently a number of qualitative and a quantitative rapid diagnostic test (RDT) format have been developed that provide an alternative to the current standard G6PD activity assays. The WHO has recently recommended routine testing of G6PD status prior to primaquine radical cure whenever possible. A workshop was held in the Philippines in early 2015 to discuss key challenges and knowledge gaps that hinder the introduction of routine G6PD testing. Two point-of-care (PoC) test formats for the measurement of G6PD activity are currently available: qualitative tests comparable to malaria RDT as well as biosensors that provide a quantitative reading. Qualitative G6PD PoC tests provide a binomial test result, are easy to use and some products are comparable in price to the widely used fluorescent spot test. Qualitative test results can accurately classify hemizygous males, heterozygous females, but may misclassify females with intermediate G6PD activity. Biosensors provide a more complex quantitative readout and are better suited to identify heterozygous females. While associated with higher costs per sample tested biosensors have the potential for broader use in other scenarios where knowledge of G6PD activity is relevant as well. The introduction of routine G6PD testing is associated with additional costs on top of routine treatment that will vary by setting and will need to be assessed prior to test introduction. Reliable G6PD PoC tests have the potential to play an essential role in future malaria elimination programmes, however require an improved understanding on how to best integrate routine G6PD testing into different health settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0896-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4587750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45877502015-09-30 The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report Ley, Benedikt Luter, Nick Espino, Fe Esperanza Devine, Angela Kalnoky, Michael Lubell, Yoel Thriemer, Kamala Baird, J. Kevin Poirot, Eugenie Conan, Nolwenn Kheong, Chong Chee Dysoley, Lek Khan, Wasif Ali Dion-Berboso, April G. Bancone, Germana Hwang, Jimee Kumar, Ritu Price, Ric N. von Seidlein, Lorenz Domingo, Gonzalo J. Malar J Meeting Report The only currently available drug that effectively removes malaria hypnozoites from the human host is primaquine. The use of 8-aminoquinolines is hampered by haemolytic side effects in glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficient individuals. Recently a number of qualitative and a quantitative rapid diagnostic test (RDT) format have been developed that provide an alternative to the current standard G6PD activity assays. The WHO has recently recommended routine testing of G6PD status prior to primaquine radical cure whenever possible. A workshop was held in the Philippines in early 2015 to discuss key challenges and knowledge gaps that hinder the introduction of routine G6PD testing. Two point-of-care (PoC) test formats for the measurement of G6PD activity are currently available: qualitative tests comparable to malaria RDT as well as biosensors that provide a quantitative reading. Qualitative G6PD PoC tests provide a binomial test result, are easy to use and some products are comparable in price to the widely used fluorescent spot test. Qualitative test results can accurately classify hemizygous males, heterozygous females, but may misclassify females with intermediate G6PD activity. Biosensors provide a more complex quantitative readout and are better suited to identify heterozygous females. While associated with higher costs per sample tested biosensors have the potential for broader use in other scenarios where knowledge of G6PD activity is relevant as well. The introduction of routine G6PD testing is associated with additional costs on top of routine treatment that will vary by setting and will need to be assessed prior to test introduction. Reliable G6PD PoC tests have the potential to play an essential role in future malaria elimination programmes, however require an improved understanding on how to best integrate routine G6PD testing into different health settings. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12936-015-0896-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4587750/ /pubmed/26416229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0896-8 Text en © Ley et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Meeting Report Ley, Benedikt Luter, Nick Espino, Fe Esperanza Devine, Angela Kalnoky, Michael Lubell, Yoel Thriemer, Kamala Baird, J. Kevin Poirot, Eugenie Conan, Nolwenn Kheong, Chong Chee Dysoley, Lek Khan, Wasif Ali Dion-Berboso, April G. Bancone, Germana Hwang, Jimee Kumar, Ritu Price, Ric N. von Seidlein, Lorenz Domingo, Gonzalo J. The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
title | The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
title_full | The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
title_fullStr | The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
title_full_unstemmed | The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
title_short | The challenges of introducing routine G6PD testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
title_sort | challenges of introducing routine g6pd testing into radical cure: a workshop report |
topic | Meeting Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-015-0896-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leybenedikt thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT luternick thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT espinofeesperanza thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT devineangela thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT kalnokymichael thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT lubellyoel thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT thriemerkamala thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT bairdjkevin thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT poiroteugenie thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT conannolwenn thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT kheongchongchee thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT dysoleylek thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT khanwasifali thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT dionberbosoaprilg thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT banconegermana thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT hwangjimee thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT kumarritu thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT pricericn thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT vonseidleinlorenz thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT domingogonzaloj thechallengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT leybenedikt challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT luternick challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT espinofeesperanza challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT devineangela challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT kalnokymichael challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT lubellyoel challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT thriemerkamala challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT bairdjkevin challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT poiroteugenie challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT conannolwenn challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT kheongchongchee challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT dysoleylek challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT khanwasifali challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT dionberbosoaprilg challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT banconegermana challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT hwangjimee challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT kumarritu challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT pricericn challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT vonseidleinlorenz challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport AT domingogonzaloj challengesofintroducingroutineg6pdtestingintoradicalcureaworkshopreport |