Cargando…

A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often difficult. Clinician related factors have been implicated as important reasons for low rates of recruitment. Clinicians (doctors and other health professionals) can experience discomfort with some underlying principles of RCTs a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Townsend, Daisy, Mills, Nicola, Savović, Jelena, Donovan, Jenny L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6
_version_ 1782392525561004032
author Townsend, Daisy
Mills, Nicola
Savović, Jelena
Donovan, Jenny L.
author_facet Townsend, Daisy
Mills, Nicola
Savović, Jelena
Donovan, Jenny L.
author_sort Townsend, Daisy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often difficult. Clinician related factors have been implicated as important reasons for low rates of recruitment. Clinicians (doctors and other health professionals) can experience discomfort with some underlying principles of RCTs and experience difficulties in conveying them positively to potential trial participants. Recruiter training has been suggested to address identified problems but a synthesis of this research is lacking. The aim of our study was to systematically review the available evidence on training interventions for recruiters to randomised trials. METHODS: Studies that evaluated training programmes for trial recruiters were included. Those that provided only general communication training not linked to RCT recruitment were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were completed by two reviewers independently, with a third author where necessary. RESULTS: Seventeen studies of 9615 potentially eligible titles and abstracts were included in the review: three randomised controlled studies, two non-randomised controlled studies, nine uncontrolled pre-test/post-test studies, two qualitative studies, and a post-training questionnaire survey. Most studies were of moderate or weak quality. Training programmes were mostly set within cancer trials, and usually consisted of workshops with a mix of health professionals over one or two consecutive days covering generic and trial specific issues. Recruiter training programmes were well received and some increased recruiters’ self-confidence in communicating key RCT concepts to patients. There was, however, little evidence that this training increased actual recruitment rates or patient understanding, satisfaction, or levels of informed consent. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to develop recruiter training programmes that can lead to improved recruitment and informed consent in randomised trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4587840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45878402015-09-30 A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials Townsend, Daisy Mills, Nicola Savović, Jelena Donovan, Jenny L. Trials Research BACKGROUND: Recruitment to randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is often difficult. Clinician related factors have been implicated as important reasons for low rates of recruitment. Clinicians (doctors and other health professionals) can experience discomfort with some underlying principles of RCTs and experience difficulties in conveying them positively to potential trial participants. Recruiter training has been suggested to address identified problems but a synthesis of this research is lacking. The aim of our study was to systematically review the available evidence on training interventions for recruiters to randomised trials. METHODS: Studies that evaluated training programmes for trial recruiters were included. Those that provided only general communication training not linked to RCT recruitment were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were completed by two reviewers independently, with a third author where necessary. RESULTS: Seventeen studies of 9615 potentially eligible titles and abstracts were included in the review: three randomised controlled studies, two non-randomised controlled studies, nine uncontrolled pre-test/post-test studies, two qualitative studies, and a post-training questionnaire survey. Most studies were of moderate or weak quality. Training programmes were mostly set within cancer trials, and usually consisted of workshops with a mix of health professionals over one or two consecutive days covering generic and trial specific issues. Recruiter training programmes were well received and some increased recruiters’ self-confidence in communicating key RCT concepts to patients. There was, however, little evidence that this training increased actual recruitment rates or patient understanding, satisfaction, or levels of informed consent. CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to develop recruiter training programmes that can lead to improved recruitment and informed consent in randomised trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4587840/ /pubmed/26416143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6 Text en © Townsend et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Townsend, Daisy
Mills, Nicola
Savović, Jelena
Donovan, Jenny L.
A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
title A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
title_full A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
title_short A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
title_sort systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4587840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26416143
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6
work_keys_str_mv AT townsenddaisy asystematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT millsnicola asystematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT savovicjelena asystematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT donovanjennyl asystematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT townsenddaisy systematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT millsnicola systematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT savovicjelena systematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT donovanjennyl systematicreviewoftrainingprogrammesforrecruiterstorandomisedcontrolledtrials