Cargando…

Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in pitch-ranking ability across a range of speech understanding performance levels and as a function of electrode position. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study of a cross-section of cochlear implantees. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for cochlear implantation. PA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kenway, Bruno, Tam, Yu Chuen, Vanat, Zebunnisa, Harris, Frances, Gray, Roger, Birchall, John, Carlyon, Robert, Axon, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26375968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845
_version_ 1782392658015027200
author Kenway, Bruno
Tam, Yu Chuen
Vanat, Zebunnisa
Harris, Frances
Gray, Roger
Birchall, John
Carlyon, Robert
Axon, Patrick
author_facet Kenway, Bruno
Tam, Yu Chuen
Vanat, Zebunnisa
Harris, Frances
Gray, Roger
Birchall, John
Carlyon, Robert
Axon, Patrick
author_sort Kenway, Bruno
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in pitch-ranking ability across a range of speech understanding performance levels and as a function of electrode position. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study of a cross-section of cochlear implantees. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for cochlear implantation. PATIENTS: A total of 22 patients were recruited. All three manufacturers’ devices were included (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria, n = 10; Advanced Bionics, California, USA, n = 8; and Cochlear, Sydney, Australia, n = 4) and all patients were long-term users (more than 18 months). Twelve of these were poor performers (scores on BKB sentence lists <60%) and 10 were excellent performers (BKB >90%). INTERVENTION: After measurement of threshold and comfort levels, and loudness balancing across the array, all patients underwent thorough pitch-ranking assessments at 80% of comfort levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ability to discriminate pitch across the electrode array, measured by consistency in discrimination of adjacent pairs of electrodes, as well as an assessment of the pitch order across the array using the midpoint comparison task. RESULTS: Within the poor performing group there was wide variability in ability to pitch rank, from no errors, to a complete inability to reliably and consistently differentiate pitch change across the electrode array. Good performers were overall significantly more accurate at pitch ranking (p = 0.026). Consistent pitch ranking was found to be a significant independent predictor of BKB score, even after adjusting for age. Users of the MED-EL implant experienced significantly more pitch confusions at the apex than at more basal parts of the electrode array. CONCLUSIONS: Many cochlear implant users struggle to discriminate pitch effectively. Accurate pitch ranking appears to be an independent predictor of overall outcome. Future work will concentrate on manipulating maps based upon pitch discrimination findings in an attempt to improve speech understanding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4588601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45886012015-10-07 Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes Kenway, Bruno Tam, Yu Chuen Vanat, Zebunnisa Harris, Frances Gray, Roger Birchall, John Carlyon, Robert Axon, Patrick Otol Neurotol Cochlear Implants OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in pitch-ranking ability across a range of speech understanding performance levels and as a function of electrode position. STUDY DESIGN: An observational study of a cross-section of cochlear implantees. SETTING: Tertiary referral center for cochlear implantation. PATIENTS: A total of 22 patients were recruited. All three manufacturers’ devices were included (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria, n = 10; Advanced Bionics, California, USA, n = 8; and Cochlear, Sydney, Australia, n = 4) and all patients were long-term users (more than 18 months). Twelve of these were poor performers (scores on BKB sentence lists <60%) and 10 were excellent performers (BKB >90%). INTERVENTION: After measurement of threshold and comfort levels, and loudness balancing across the array, all patients underwent thorough pitch-ranking assessments at 80% of comfort levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Ability to discriminate pitch across the electrode array, measured by consistency in discrimination of adjacent pairs of electrodes, as well as an assessment of the pitch order across the array using the midpoint comparison task. RESULTS: Within the poor performing group there was wide variability in ability to pitch rank, from no errors, to a complete inability to reliably and consistently differentiate pitch change across the electrode array. Good performers were overall significantly more accurate at pitch ranking (p = 0.026). Consistent pitch ranking was found to be a significant independent predictor of BKB score, even after adjusting for age. Users of the MED-EL implant experienced significantly more pitch confusions at the apex than at more basal parts of the electrode array. CONCLUSIONS: Many cochlear implant users struggle to discriminate pitch effectively. Accurate pitch ranking appears to be an independent predictor of overall outcome. Future work will concentrate on manipulating maps based upon pitch discrimination findings in an attempt to improve speech understanding. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2015-09 2015-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4588601/ /pubmed/26375968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845 Text en Copyright © 2015 Otology & Neurotology, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Cochlear Implants
Kenway, Bruno
Tam, Yu Chuen
Vanat, Zebunnisa
Harris, Frances
Gray, Roger
Birchall, John
Carlyon, Robert
Axon, Patrick
Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
title Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
title_full Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
title_fullStr Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
title_short Pitch Discrimination: An Independent Factor in Cochlear Implant Performance Outcomes
title_sort pitch discrimination: an independent factor in cochlear implant performance outcomes
topic Cochlear Implants
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26375968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000845
work_keys_str_mv AT kenwaybruno pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT tamyuchuen pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT vanatzebunnisa pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT harrisfrances pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT grayroger pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT birchalljohn pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT carlyonrobert pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes
AT axonpatrick pitchdiscriminationanindependentfactorincochlearimplantperformanceoutcomes