Cargando…

Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile

Natural ecosystems provide services to agriculture such as pest control, soil nutrients, and key microbial components. These services and others in turn provide essential elements that fuel biomass productivity. Responsible agricultural management and conservation of natural habitats can enhance the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Castañeda, Luis E., Godoy, Karina, Manzano, Marlene, Marquet, Pablo A., Barbosa, Olga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1652
_version_ 1782392666150928384
author Castañeda, Luis E.
Godoy, Karina
Manzano, Marlene
Marquet, Pablo A.
Barbosa, Olga
author_facet Castañeda, Luis E.
Godoy, Karina
Manzano, Marlene
Marquet, Pablo A.
Barbosa, Olga
author_sort Castañeda, Luis E.
collection PubMed
description Natural ecosystems provide services to agriculture such as pest control, soil nutrients, and key microbial components. These services and others in turn provide essential elements that fuel biomass productivity. Responsible agricultural management and conservation of natural habitats can enhance these ecosystem services. Vineyards are currently driving land‐use changes in many Mediterranean ecosystems. These land‐use changes could have important effects on the supporting ecosystems services related to the soil properties and the microbial communities associated with forests and vineyard soils. Here, we explore soil bacterial and fungal communities present in sclerophyllous forests and organic vineyards from three different wine growing areas in central Chile. We employed terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms (T‐RFLP) to describe the soil microbial communities inhabiting native forests and vineyards in central Chile. We found that the bacterial community changed between the sampled growing areas; however, the fungal community did not differ. At the local scale, our findings show that fungal communities differed between habitats because fungi species might be more sensitive to land‐use change compared to bacterial species, as bacterial communities did not change between forests and vineyards. We discuss these findings based on the sensitivity of microbial communities to soil properties and land‐use change. Finally, we focus our conclusions on the importance of naturally derived ecosystem services to vineyards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4588659
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45886592015-10-06 Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile Castañeda, Luis E. Godoy, Karina Manzano, Marlene Marquet, Pablo A. Barbosa, Olga Ecol Evol Original Research Natural ecosystems provide services to agriculture such as pest control, soil nutrients, and key microbial components. These services and others in turn provide essential elements that fuel biomass productivity. Responsible agricultural management and conservation of natural habitats can enhance these ecosystem services. Vineyards are currently driving land‐use changes in many Mediterranean ecosystems. These land‐use changes could have important effects on the supporting ecosystems services related to the soil properties and the microbial communities associated with forests and vineyard soils. Here, we explore soil bacterial and fungal communities present in sclerophyllous forests and organic vineyards from three different wine growing areas in central Chile. We employed terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms (T‐RFLP) to describe the soil microbial communities inhabiting native forests and vineyards in central Chile. We found that the bacterial community changed between the sampled growing areas; however, the fungal community did not differ. At the local scale, our findings show that fungal communities differed between habitats because fungi species might be more sensitive to land‐use change compared to bacterial species, as bacterial communities did not change between forests and vineyards. We discuss these findings based on the sensitivity of microbial communities to soil properties and land‐use change. Finally, we focus our conclusions on the importance of naturally derived ecosystem services to vineyards. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4588659/ /pubmed/26445647 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1652 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Castañeda, Luis E.
Godoy, Karina
Manzano, Marlene
Marquet, Pablo A.
Barbosa, Olga
Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile
title Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile
title_full Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile
title_fullStr Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile
title_short Comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central Chile
title_sort comparison of soil microbial communities inhabiting vineyards and native sclerophyllous forests in central chile
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588659/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26445647
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1652
work_keys_str_mv AT castanedaluise comparisonofsoilmicrobialcommunitiesinhabitingvineyardsandnativesclerophyllousforestsincentralchile
AT godoykarina comparisonofsoilmicrobialcommunitiesinhabitingvineyardsandnativesclerophyllousforestsincentralchile
AT manzanomarlene comparisonofsoilmicrobialcommunitiesinhabitingvineyardsandnativesclerophyllousforestsincentralchile
AT marquetpabloa comparisonofsoilmicrobialcommunitiesinhabitingvineyardsandnativesclerophyllousforestsincentralchile
AT barbosaolga comparisonofsoilmicrobialcommunitiesinhabitingvineyardsandnativesclerophyllousforestsincentralchile