Cargando…
One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review
The mixed dentition is the developmental period after the permanent first molars and incisors have erupted, and before the remaining deciduous teeth are lost. Phase I treatment is usually done early in this period. Mixed dentition treatment goals often focus on skeletal rather than dental correction...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464559 |
_version_ | 1782392684665634816 |
---|---|
author | Suresh, M Ratnaditya, Akurathi Kattimani, Vivekanand S Karpe, Shameem |
author_facet | Suresh, M Ratnaditya, Akurathi Kattimani, Vivekanand S Karpe, Shameem |
author_sort | Suresh, M |
collection | PubMed |
description | The mixed dentition is the developmental period after the permanent first molars and incisors have erupted, and before the remaining deciduous teeth are lost. Phase I treatment is usually done early in this period. Mixed dentition treatment goals often focus on skeletal rather than dental correction. To design a treatment plan, the clinician must understand the growth and development patterns, and the known effects of the chosen treatment modality. Jaw growth affects orthodontic treatment, usually favorably, but sometimes unfavorably. When and how much growth will occur is completely unpredictable. However, we know some useful facts about jaw growth in the mixed dentition. The two areas that remain controversial in the orthodontic literature are the treatment of crowding and of Class II malocclusions in the mixed dentition. Is there a benefit to early treatment for these problems? This question has yet to be fully answered by researchers. Hence, we planned for review of all available literature to come to a consensus about preventive or interceptive orthodontics or in other words Phase 1 and Phase 2 treatment. The clinician can diagnose and intercept certain developing problems with early treatment. Many other cases should be supervised, but not treated until the permanent teeth are in place. We must base our decision to treat on experience, knowledge of growth and dental development, and research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4588783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45887832015-10-13 One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review Suresh, M Ratnaditya, Akurathi Kattimani, Vivekanand S Karpe, Shameem J Int Oral Health Review Article The mixed dentition is the developmental period after the permanent first molars and incisors have erupted, and before the remaining deciduous teeth are lost. Phase I treatment is usually done early in this period. Mixed dentition treatment goals often focus on skeletal rather than dental correction. To design a treatment plan, the clinician must understand the growth and development patterns, and the known effects of the chosen treatment modality. Jaw growth affects orthodontic treatment, usually favorably, but sometimes unfavorably. When and how much growth will occur is completely unpredictable. However, we know some useful facts about jaw growth in the mixed dentition. The two areas that remain controversial in the orthodontic literature are the treatment of crowding and of Class II malocclusions in the mixed dentition. Is there a benefit to early treatment for these problems? This question has yet to be fully answered by researchers. Hence, we planned for review of all available literature to come to a consensus about preventive or interceptive orthodontics or in other words Phase 1 and Phase 2 treatment. The clinician can diagnose and intercept certain developing problems with early treatment. Many other cases should be supervised, but not treated until the permanent teeth are in place. We must base our decision to treat on experience, knowledge of growth and dental development, and research. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4588783/ /pubmed/26464559 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Suresh, M Ratnaditya, Akurathi Kattimani, Vivekanand S Karpe, Shameem One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review |
title | One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review |
title_full | One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review |
title_fullStr | One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review |
title_full_unstemmed | One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review |
title_short | One Phase versus Two Phase Treatment in Mixed Dentition: A Critical Review |
title_sort | one phase versus two phase treatment in mixed dentition: a critical review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26464559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sureshm onephaseversustwophasetreatmentinmixeddentitionacriticalreview AT ratnadityaakurathi onephaseversustwophasetreatmentinmixeddentitionacriticalreview AT kattimanivivekanands onephaseversustwophasetreatmentinmixeddentitionacriticalreview AT karpeshameem onephaseversustwophasetreatmentinmixeddentitionacriticalreview |