Cargando…
Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients?
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a major health concern all over the world. The prevention of diabetes is important but so is well-balanced diabetes care. Diabetes care can be influenced by individual and neighborhood socio-economic factors and geographical accessibility to health care services. The a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26420168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0020-x |
_version_ | 1782392698522566656 |
---|---|
author | Toivakka, Maija Laatikainen, Tiina Kumpula, Timo Tykkyläinen, Markku |
author_facet | Toivakka, Maija Laatikainen, Tiina Kumpula, Timo Tykkyläinen, Markku |
author_sort | Toivakka, Maija |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a major health concern all over the world. The prevention of diabetes is important but so is well-balanced diabetes care. Diabetes care can be influenced by individual and neighborhood socio-economic factors and geographical accessibility to health care services. The aim of the study is to find out whether two different area classifications of urban and rural areas give different area-level results of achieving the targets of control and treatment among type 2 diabetes patients exemplified by a Finnish region. The study exploits geo-referenced patient data from a regional primary health care patient database combined with postal code area-level socio-economic variables, digital road data and two grid based classifications of areas: an urban–rural dichotomy and a classification with seven area types. METHODS: The achievement of control and treatment targets were assessed using the patient’s individual laboratory data among 9606 type 2 diabetes patients. It was assessed whether hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was controlled and whether the recommended level of HbA1c was achieved in patients by different area classes and as a function of distance. Chi square test and logistic regression analysis were used for testing. RESULTS: The study reveals that area-level inequalities exist in the care of type 2 diabetes in a detailed 7-class area classification but if the simple dichotomy of urban and rural is applied differences vanish. The patient’s gender and age, area-level education and the area class they belonged to were associated with achievements of control and treatment targets. Longer distance to health care services was not a barrier to good achievements of control or treatment targets. CONCLUSIONS: A more detailed grid-based area classification is better for showing spatial differences in the care of type 2 diabetes patients. Inequalities exist but it would be misleading to state that the differences are simply due to urban or rural location or due to distance. From a planning point of view findings suggest that detailed geo-coded patient information could be utilized more in resourcing and targeting the health care services to find the area-level needs of care and to improve the cost-efficient allocation of resources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4588873 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45888732015-10-01 Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? Toivakka, Maija Laatikainen, Tiina Kumpula, Timo Tykkyläinen, Markku Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a major health concern all over the world. The prevention of diabetes is important but so is well-balanced diabetes care. Diabetes care can be influenced by individual and neighborhood socio-economic factors and geographical accessibility to health care services. The aim of the study is to find out whether two different area classifications of urban and rural areas give different area-level results of achieving the targets of control and treatment among type 2 diabetes patients exemplified by a Finnish region. The study exploits geo-referenced patient data from a regional primary health care patient database combined with postal code area-level socio-economic variables, digital road data and two grid based classifications of areas: an urban–rural dichotomy and a classification with seven area types. METHODS: The achievement of control and treatment targets were assessed using the patient’s individual laboratory data among 9606 type 2 diabetes patients. It was assessed whether hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was controlled and whether the recommended level of HbA1c was achieved in patients by different area classes and as a function of distance. Chi square test and logistic regression analysis were used for testing. RESULTS: The study reveals that area-level inequalities exist in the care of type 2 diabetes in a detailed 7-class area classification but if the simple dichotomy of urban and rural is applied differences vanish. The patient’s gender and age, area-level education and the area class they belonged to were associated with achievements of control and treatment targets. Longer distance to health care services was not a barrier to good achievements of control or treatment targets. CONCLUSIONS: A more detailed grid-based area classification is better for showing spatial differences in the care of type 2 diabetes patients. Inequalities exist but it would be misleading to state that the differences are simply due to urban or rural location or due to distance. From a planning point of view findings suggest that detailed geo-coded patient information could be utilized more in resourcing and targeting the health care services to find the area-level needs of care and to improve the cost-efficient allocation of resources. BioMed Central 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4588873/ /pubmed/26420168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0020-x Text en © Toivakka et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Toivakka, Maija Laatikainen, Tiina Kumpula, Timo Tykkyläinen, Markku Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
title | Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
title_full | Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
title_fullStr | Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
title_short | Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
title_sort | do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588873/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26420168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12942-015-0020-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toivakkamaija dotheclassificationofareasanddistancemattertotheassessmentresultsofachievingthetreatmenttargetsamongtype2diabetespatients AT laatikainentiina dotheclassificationofareasanddistancemattertotheassessmentresultsofachievingthetreatmenttargetsamongtype2diabetespatients AT kumpulatimo dotheclassificationofareasanddistancemattertotheassessmentresultsofachievingthetreatmenttargetsamongtype2diabetespatients AT tykkylainenmarkku dotheclassificationofareasanddistancemattertotheassessmentresultsofachievingthetreatmenttargetsamongtype2diabetespatients |