Cargando…

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program

OBJECTIVES: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is commonly used for examination of soft tissue and some bony injuries. MRIs are seemingly ordered more commonly and sooner after injury diagnosis in athletes than in the general population. There is no published data or guidelines regarding the use of MR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huston, Kellen L., Cutuk, Adnan, Kaar, Scott G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588943/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113S00112
_version_ 1782392713860087808
author Huston, Kellen L.
Cutuk, Adnan
Kaar, Scott G.
author_facet Huston, Kellen L.
Cutuk, Adnan
Kaar, Scott G.
author_sort Huston, Kellen L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is commonly used for examination of soft tissue and some bony injuries. MRIs are seemingly ordered more commonly and sooner after injury diagnosis in athletes than in the general population. There is no published data or guidelines regarding the use of MRI in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to prospectively document musculoskeletal MRI use and its effect on diagnosis, playing status and treatment of athletes at a division I university sports program. We hypothesized that MRI is commonly used early in the injury course and often has little or no effect on the diagnosis or treatment plan for most injuries. METHODS: Data was collected of musculoskeletal MRI use in varsity student athletes for 2 full academic years from 2010-12 at a NCAA Division I institution. Data collected included timing of the injury and physician visit as well as pre and post-MRI diagnosis, playing status and treatment. RESULTS: 86 MRI’s were obtained during the 2 years studied. Average age was 19.9 (18-23). 45 percent of injuries occurred during competition season, 34% pre-season and 21% post-season. No statistically significant difference was seen with respect to pre-MRI vs post-MRI diagnosis, treatment or participation status (p>.05) With removal of the 15 MRI’s obtained for preoperative planning no significance was again seen with regards to pre-MRI post-MRI diagnosis, participation status or treatment (p>.05). There was a change in diagnosis in 13 athletes (only 1 led to surgery performed after completion of the season) and there was a change in participation status in 8 athletes (5 increased, 3 decreased). No athlete required surgery immediately following an MRI that wasn’t already being planned. CONCLUSION: The use of MRI in a division I sports medicine athletic program rarely changed diagnosis, treatment or playing status of an athlete. MRI did not demonstrate significant benefit over history and physical examination. The role of MRI in athletes is mainly for pre-surgical planning and reassurance of the athlete, athletic training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4588943
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45889432015-11-03 The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program Huston, Kellen L. Cutuk, Adnan Kaar, Scott G. Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is commonly used for examination of soft tissue and some bony injuries. MRIs are seemingly ordered more commonly and sooner after injury diagnosis in athletes than in the general population. There is no published data or guidelines regarding the use of MRI in this patient population. The purpose of this study was to prospectively document musculoskeletal MRI use and its effect on diagnosis, playing status and treatment of athletes at a division I university sports program. We hypothesized that MRI is commonly used early in the injury course and often has little or no effect on the diagnosis or treatment plan for most injuries. METHODS: Data was collected of musculoskeletal MRI use in varsity student athletes for 2 full academic years from 2010-12 at a NCAA Division I institution. Data collected included timing of the injury and physician visit as well as pre and post-MRI diagnosis, playing status and treatment. RESULTS: 86 MRI’s were obtained during the 2 years studied. Average age was 19.9 (18-23). 45 percent of injuries occurred during competition season, 34% pre-season and 21% post-season. No statistically significant difference was seen with respect to pre-MRI vs post-MRI diagnosis, treatment or participation status (p>.05) With removal of the 15 MRI’s obtained for preoperative planning no significance was again seen with regards to pre-MRI post-MRI diagnosis, participation status or treatment (p>.05). There was a change in diagnosis in 13 athletes (only 1 led to surgery performed after completion of the season) and there was a change in participation status in 8 athletes (5 increased, 3 decreased). No athlete required surgery immediately following an MRI that wasn’t already being planned. CONCLUSION: The use of MRI in a division I sports medicine athletic program rarely changed diagnosis, treatment or playing status of an athlete. MRI did not demonstrate significant benefit over history and physical examination. The role of MRI in athletes is mainly for pre-surgical planning and reassurance of the athlete, athletic training. SAGE Publications 2013-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4588943/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113S00112 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Huston, Kellen L.
Cutuk, Adnan
Kaar, Scott G.
The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program
title The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program
title_full The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program
title_fullStr The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program
title_short The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Division I University Sports Medicine Program
title_sort role of magnetic resonance imaging in a division i university sports medicine program
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588943/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113S00112
work_keys_str_mv AT hustonkellenl theroleofmagneticresonanceimaginginadivisioniuniversitysportsmedicineprogram
AT cutukadnan theroleofmagneticresonanceimaginginadivisioniuniversitysportsmedicineprogram
AT kaarscottg theroleofmagneticresonanceimaginginadivisioniuniversitysportsmedicineprogram
AT hustonkellenl roleofmagneticresonanceimaginginadivisioniuniversitysportsmedicineprogram
AT cutukadnan roleofmagneticresonanceimaginginadivisioniuniversitysportsmedicineprogram
AT kaarscottg roleofmagneticresonanceimaginginadivisioniuniversitysportsmedicineprogram