Cargando…

Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View

OBJECTIVES: Recently the AP, Dunn and Frog Leg Lateral radiographic views have been verified to accurately reflect the findings of three dimensional imaging while assessing for cam lesions. The false profile radiographic view is traditionally used to measure acetabular coverage in the setting of fem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellman, Michael D., Fillingham, Yale A., Gupta, Anil K., Frank, Rachel, Haughom, Bryan D., Nho, Shane Jay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588991/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113S00007
_version_ 1782392724899495936
author Hellman, Michael D.
Fillingham, Yale A.
Gupta, Anil K.
Frank, Rachel
Haughom, Bryan D.
Nho, Shane Jay
author_facet Hellman, Michael D.
Fillingham, Yale A.
Gupta, Anil K.
Frank, Rachel
Haughom, Bryan D.
Nho, Shane Jay
author_sort Hellman, Michael D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Recently the AP, Dunn and Frog Leg Lateral radiographic views have been verified to accurately reflect the findings of three dimensional imaging while assessing for cam lesions. The false profile radiographic view is traditionally used to measure acetabular coverage in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement. We believe it should also be used to assess the femoral head neck junction. Our objective is to verify the accuracy of this view with respect to 3D CT scan findings. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 consecutive surgical patients between May 2012 and September 2012 with preoperative radial oblique reformatted CT scans and plain radiographs. Alpha angles were measured on plain radiographs (AP, Dunn, False Profile) and CT reformats. Abnormal alpha angles were considered greater than 55 degrees and the CT scans were considered gold standard. Post-operative radiographs were also measured. Two physicians independently measured the images and the results were compared. RESULTS: The false profile view was 70.6% sensitive and 95.0% specific for diagnosing a cam lesion. It was noted that the false profile view was 1.31 times better than other views at visualizing the anterior head-neck junction at a 3 o’clock position (See image 1). The false profile view pre-operative mean alpha angle was 53.4° versus its post-operative mean alpha angle was 41.9°, Δ = 11.5° (t = 0.001). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was found to be 0.81. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to suggest using the false profile view to assess the femoral head neck junction. For diagnostic and treatment purposes, the false profile view effectively characterizes cam lesions, particularly anterior 3 o’clock lesions. Further, it shows promising results as a peri-operative assessment tool to verify adequate osteoplasty. Measuring the alpha angle on this view also appears to be a reproducible with a significant ICC. We believe this view should be used for both acetabular coverage measurements as well as for femoral head neck junction measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4588991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45889912015-11-03 Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View Hellman, Michael D. Fillingham, Yale A. Gupta, Anil K. Frank, Rachel Haughom, Bryan D. Nho, Shane Jay Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Recently the AP, Dunn and Frog Leg Lateral radiographic views have been verified to accurately reflect the findings of three dimensional imaging while assessing for cam lesions. The false profile radiographic view is traditionally used to measure acetabular coverage in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement. We believe it should also be used to assess the femoral head neck junction. Our objective is to verify the accuracy of this view with respect to 3D CT scan findings. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 37 consecutive surgical patients between May 2012 and September 2012 with preoperative radial oblique reformatted CT scans and plain radiographs. Alpha angles were measured on plain radiographs (AP, Dunn, False Profile) and CT reformats. Abnormal alpha angles were considered greater than 55 degrees and the CT scans were considered gold standard. Post-operative radiographs were also measured. Two physicians independently measured the images and the results were compared. RESULTS: The false profile view was 70.6% sensitive and 95.0% specific for diagnosing a cam lesion. It was noted that the false profile view was 1.31 times better than other views at visualizing the anterior head-neck junction at a 3 o’clock position (See image 1). The false profile view pre-operative mean alpha angle was 53.4° versus its post-operative mean alpha angle was 41.9°, Δ = 11.5° (t = 0.001). The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was found to be 0.81. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to suggest using the false profile view to assess the femoral head neck junction. For diagnostic and treatment purposes, the false profile view effectively characterizes cam lesions, particularly anterior 3 o’clock lesions. Further, it shows promising results as a peri-operative assessment tool to verify adequate osteoplasty. Measuring the alpha angle on this view also appears to be a reproducible with a significant ICC. We believe this view should be used for both acetabular coverage measurements as well as for femoral head neck junction measurements. SAGE Publications 2013-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4588991/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113S00007 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Hellman, Michael D.
Fillingham, Yale A.
Gupta, Anil K.
Frank, Rachel
Haughom, Bryan D.
Nho, Shane Jay
Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View
title Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View
title_full Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View
title_fullStr Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View
title_full_unstemmed Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View
title_short Identifying Cam Lesions on the False Profile View
title_sort identifying cam lesions on the false profile view
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4588991/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113S00007
work_keys_str_mv AT hellmanmichaeld identifyingcamlesionsonthefalseprofileview
AT fillinghamyalea identifyingcamlesionsonthefalseprofileview
AT guptaanilk identifyingcamlesionsonthefalseprofileview
AT frankrachel identifyingcamlesionsonthefalseprofileview
AT haughombryand identifyingcamlesionsonthefalseprofileview
AT nhoshanejay identifyingcamlesionsonthefalseprofileview