Cargando…

A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation

BACKGROUND: Developing valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a critical step in promoting patient-centered health care, a national priority in the U.S. Small populations or rare diseases often pose difficulties in developing PROMs using traditional methods due to small samp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrard, Lili, Price, Larry R., Bott, Marjorie J., Gajewski, Byron J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26419748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0071-5
_version_ 1782392733235675136
author Garrard, Lili
Price, Larry R.
Bott, Marjorie J.
Gajewski, Byron J.
author_facet Garrard, Lili
Price, Larry R.
Bott, Marjorie J.
Gajewski, Byron J.
author_sort Garrard, Lili
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Developing valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a critical step in promoting patient-centered health care, a national priority in the U.S. Small populations or rare diseases often pose difficulties in developing PROMs using traditional methods due to small samples. METHODS: To overcome the small sample size challenge while maintaining psychometric soundness, we propose an innovative Ordinal Bayesian Instrument Development (OBID) method that seamlessly integrates expert and participant data in a Bayesian item response theory (IRT) with a probit link model framework. Prior distributions obtained from expert data are imposed on the IRT model parameters and are updated with participants’ data. The efficiency of OBID is evaluated by comparing its performance to classical instrument development performance using actual and simulation data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The overall performance of OBID (i.e., more reliable parameter estimates, smaller mean squared errors (MSEs) and higher predictive validity) is superior to that of classical approaches when the sample size is small (e.g. less than 100 subjects). Although OBID may exhibit larger bias, it reduces the MSEs by decreasing variances. Results also closely align with recommendations in the current literature that six subject experts will be sufficient for establishing content validity evidence. However, in the presence of highly biased experts, three experts will be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully demonstrated that the OBID approach is more efficient than the classical approach when the sample size is small. OBID promises an efficient and reliable method for researchers and clinicians in future PROMs development for small populations or rare diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0071-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45890272015-10-01 A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation Garrard, Lili Price, Larry R. Bott, Marjorie J. Gajewski, Byron J. BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Developing valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is a critical step in promoting patient-centered health care, a national priority in the U.S. Small populations or rare diseases often pose difficulties in developing PROMs using traditional methods due to small samples. METHODS: To overcome the small sample size challenge while maintaining psychometric soundness, we propose an innovative Ordinal Bayesian Instrument Development (OBID) method that seamlessly integrates expert and participant data in a Bayesian item response theory (IRT) with a probit link model framework. Prior distributions obtained from expert data are imposed on the IRT model parameters and are updated with participants’ data. The efficiency of OBID is evaluated by comparing its performance to classical instrument development performance using actual and simulation data. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The overall performance of OBID (i.e., more reliable parameter estimates, smaller mean squared errors (MSEs) and higher predictive validity) is superior to that of classical approaches when the sample size is small (e.g. less than 100 subjects). Although OBID may exhibit larger bias, it reduces the MSEs by decreasing variances. Results also closely align with recommendations in the current literature that six subject experts will be sufficient for establishing content validity evidence. However, in the presence of highly biased experts, three experts will be adequate. CONCLUSIONS: This study successfully demonstrated that the OBID approach is more efficient than the classical approach when the sample size is small. OBID promises an efficient and reliable method for researchers and clinicians in future PROMs development for small populations or rare diseases. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0071-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4589027/ /pubmed/26419748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0071-5 Text en © Garrard et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garrard, Lili
Price, Larry R.
Bott, Marjorie J.
Gajewski, Byron J.
A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
title A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
title_full A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
title_fullStr A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
title_full_unstemmed A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
title_short A novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
title_sort novel method for expediting the development of patient-reported outcome measures and an evaluation of its performance via simulation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26419748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0071-5
work_keys_str_mv AT garrardlili anovelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT pricelarryr anovelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT bottmarjoriej anovelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT gajewskibyronj anovelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT garrardlili novelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT pricelarryr novelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT bottmarjoriej novelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation
AT gajewskibyronj novelmethodforexpeditingthedevelopmentofpatientreportedoutcomemeasuresandanevaluationofitsperformanceviasimulation