Cargando…

Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country

BACKGROUND: Patient autonomy is a fundamental, yet challenging, principle of professional medical ethics. The idea that individual patients should have the freedom to make choices about their lives, including medical matters, has become increasingly prominent in current literature. However, this has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murgic, Lucija, Hébert, Philip C., Sovic, Slavica, Pavlekovic, Gordana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26420014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0059-z
_version_ 1782392742799736832
author Murgic, Lucija
Hébert, Philip C.
Sovic, Slavica
Pavlekovic, Gordana
author_facet Murgic, Lucija
Hébert, Philip C.
Sovic, Slavica
Pavlekovic, Gordana
author_sort Murgic, Lucija
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient autonomy is a fundamental, yet challenging, principle of professional medical ethics. The idea that individual patients should have the freedom to make choices about their lives, including medical matters, has become increasingly prominent in current literature. However, this has not always been the case, especially in communist countries where paternalistic attitudes have been interwoven into all relationships including medical ones. Patients’ expectations and the role of the doctor in the patient-physician relationship are changing. Croatia, as a transitional country, is currently undergoing this particular process. METHODS: Qualitative research was conducted by means of six focus group discussions held in the years 2012 and 2013 in Croatia. Focus groups were held separately with each of the following: first year and final (6(th)) year medical students, physicians engaged in medical ethics education, physicians practicing in a clinical hospital, family medicine residents and individuals representing patients with chronic disease. This research specifically addresses issues related to patient autonomy, in particular, the principles of truth telling, confidentiality, and informed consent. All focus group discussions were audio taped and then transcribed verbatim and systematized according to acknowledged qualitative analysis methods. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Patient autonomy is much more than a simple notion defined as the patient’s right to make treatment decisions independently. It has to be understood in context of the broader socio-cultural setting. At present, both patients and medical doctors in Croatia are increasingly appreciating the importance of promoting the principle of autonomy in medical decision-making. However, the current views of medical students, physicians and patients reveal inconsistencies. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing how to respect the various facets of patients’ autonomy should be part of physician’s professional duties, and also be reflected in his or her core clinical competencies. For this reason greater importance should be dedicated to patient autonomy issues in medical education in Croatia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589086
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45890862015-10-01 Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country Murgic, Lucija Hébert, Philip C. Sovic, Slavica Pavlekovic, Gordana BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient autonomy is a fundamental, yet challenging, principle of professional medical ethics. The idea that individual patients should have the freedom to make choices about their lives, including medical matters, has become increasingly prominent in current literature. However, this has not always been the case, especially in communist countries where paternalistic attitudes have been interwoven into all relationships including medical ones. Patients’ expectations and the role of the doctor in the patient-physician relationship are changing. Croatia, as a transitional country, is currently undergoing this particular process. METHODS: Qualitative research was conducted by means of six focus group discussions held in the years 2012 and 2013 in Croatia. Focus groups were held separately with each of the following: first year and final (6(th)) year medical students, physicians engaged in medical ethics education, physicians practicing in a clinical hospital, family medicine residents and individuals representing patients with chronic disease. This research specifically addresses issues related to patient autonomy, in particular, the principles of truth telling, confidentiality, and informed consent. All focus group discussions were audio taped and then transcribed verbatim and systematized according to acknowledged qualitative analysis methods. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Patient autonomy is much more than a simple notion defined as the patient’s right to make treatment decisions independently. It has to be understood in context of the broader socio-cultural setting. At present, both patients and medical doctors in Croatia are increasingly appreciating the importance of promoting the principle of autonomy in medical decision-making. However, the current views of medical students, physicians and patients reveal inconsistencies. CONCLUSIONS: Knowing how to respect the various facets of patients’ autonomy should be part of physician’s professional duties, and also be reflected in his or her core clinical competencies. For this reason greater importance should be dedicated to patient autonomy issues in medical education in Croatia. BioMed Central 2015-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4589086/ /pubmed/26420014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0059-z Text en © Murgic et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Murgic, Lucija
Hébert, Philip C.
Sovic, Slavica
Pavlekovic, Gordana
Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
title Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
title_full Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
title_fullStr Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
title_full_unstemmed Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
title_short Paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
title_sort paternalism and autonomy: views of patients and providers in a transitional (post-communist) country
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589086/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26420014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0059-z
work_keys_str_mv AT murgiclucija paternalismandautonomyviewsofpatientsandprovidersinatransitionalpostcommunistcountry
AT hebertphilipc paternalismandautonomyviewsofpatientsandprovidersinatransitionalpostcommunistcountry
AT sovicslavica paternalismandautonomyviewsofpatientsandprovidersinatransitionalpostcommunistcountry
AT pavlekovicgordana paternalismandautonomyviewsofpatientsandprovidersinatransitionalpostcommunistcountry