Cargando…

Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the benefits that some patients derive from complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) are related to the therapies recommended or to the consultation process as some CIM provider visits are more involved than conventional medical visits. Many patients with gastro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dossett, Michelle L., Mu, Lin, Davis, Roger B., Bell, Iris R., Lembo, Anthony J., Kaptchuk, Ted J., Yeh, Gloria Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26422466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136855
_version_ 1782392772239556608
author Dossett, Michelle L.
Mu, Lin
Davis, Roger B.
Bell, Iris R.
Lembo, Anthony J.
Kaptchuk, Ted J.
Yeh, Gloria Y.
author_facet Dossett, Michelle L.
Mu, Lin
Davis, Roger B.
Bell, Iris R.
Lembo, Anthony J.
Kaptchuk, Ted J.
Yeh, Gloria Y.
author_sort Dossett, Michelle L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the benefits that some patients derive from complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) are related to the therapies recommended or to the consultation process as some CIM provider visits are more involved than conventional medical visits. Many patients with gastrointestinal conditions seek out CIM therapies, and prior work has demonstrated that the quality of the patient-provider interaction can improve health outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome, however, the impact of this interaction on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of conducting a 2x2 factorial design study preliminarily exploring the impact of the patient-provider interaction, and the effect of an over-the-counter homeopathic product, Acidil, on symptoms and health-related quality of life in subjects with GERD. METHODS: 24 subjects with GERD-related symptoms were randomized in a 2x2 factorial design to receive 1) either a standard visit based on an empathic conventional primary care evaluation or an expanded visit with questions modeled after a CIM consultation and 2) either Acidil or placebo for two weeks. Subjects completed a daily GERD symptom diary and additional measures of symptom severity and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in GERD symptom severity between the Acidil and placebo groups from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.41), however, subjects who received the expanded visit were significantly more likely to report a 50% or greater improvement in symptom severity compared to subjects who received the standard visit (p = 0.01). Total consultation length, perceived empathy, and baseline beliefs in CIM were not associated with treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: An expanded patient-provider visit resulted in greater GERD symptom improvement than a standard empathic medical visit. CIM consultations may have enhanced placebo effects, and further studies to assess the active components of this visit-based intervention are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01915173
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45893382015-10-02 Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial Dossett, Michelle L. Mu, Lin Davis, Roger B. Bell, Iris R. Lembo, Anthony J. Kaptchuk, Ted J. Yeh, Gloria Y. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the benefits that some patients derive from complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) are related to the therapies recommended or to the consultation process as some CIM provider visits are more involved than conventional medical visits. Many patients with gastrointestinal conditions seek out CIM therapies, and prior work has demonstrated that the quality of the patient-provider interaction can improve health outcomes in irritable bowel syndrome, however, the impact of this interaction on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is unknown. We aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of conducting a 2x2 factorial design study preliminarily exploring the impact of the patient-provider interaction, and the effect of an over-the-counter homeopathic product, Acidil, on symptoms and health-related quality of life in subjects with GERD. METHODS: 24 subjects with GERD-related symptoms were randomized in a 2x2 factorial design to receive 1) either a standard visit based on an empathic conventional primary care evaluation or an expanded visit with questions modeled after a CIM consultation and 2) either Acidil or placebo for two weeks. Subjects completed a daily GERD symptom diary and additional measures of symptom severity and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in GERD symptom severity between the Acidil and placebo groups from baseline to follow-up (p = 0.41), however, subjects who received the expanded visit were significantly more likely to report a 50% or greater improvement in symptom severity compared to subjects who received the standard visit (p = 0.01). Total consultation length, perceived empathy, and baseline beliefs in CIM were not associated with treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: An expanded patient-provider visit resulted in greater GERD symptom improvement than a standard empathic medical visit. CIM consultations may have enhanced placebo effects, and further studies to assess the active components of this visit-based intervention are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01915173 Public Library of Science 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4589338/ /pubmed/26422466 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136855 Text en © 2015 Dossett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dossett, Michelle L.
Mu, Lin
Davis, Roger B.
Bell, Iris R.
Lembo, Anthony J.
Kaptchuk, Ted J.
Yeh, Gloria Y.
Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_short Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
title_sort patient-provider interactions affect symptoms in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26422466
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136855
work_keys_str_mv AT dossettmichellel patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT mulin patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT davisrogerb patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT bellirisr patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT lemboanthonyj patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT kaptchuktedj patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial
AT yehgloriay patientproviderinteractionsaffectsymptomsingastroesophagealrefluxdiseaseapilotrandomizeddoubleblindplacebocontrolledtrial