Cargando…

The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope

Background. The Arclight ophthalmoscope is a low-cost alternative to standard direct ophthalmoscopes. This study compared the Arclight ophthalmoscope with the Heine K180 direct ophthalmoscope to evaluate its reliability in assessing the vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) and its ease of use (EOU). Metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lowe, James, Cleland, Charles R., Mgaya, Evarista, Furahini, Godfrey, Gilbert, Clare E., Burton, Matthew J., Philippin, Heiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26457197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743263
_version_ 1782392813665648640
author Lowe, James
Cleland, Charles R.
Mgaya, Evarista
Furahini, Godfrey
Gilbert, Clare E.
Burton, Matthew J.
Philippin, Heiko
author_facet Lowe, James
Cleland, Charles R.
Mgaya, Evarista
Furahini, Godfrey
Gilbert, Clare E.
Burton, Matthew J.
Philippin, Heiko
author_sort Lowe, James
collection PubMed
description Background. The Arclight ophthalmoscope is a low-cost alternative to standard direct ophthalmoscopes. This study compared the Arclight ophthalmoscope with the Heine K180 direct ophthalmoscope to evaluate its reliability in assessing the vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) and its ease of use (EOU). Methods. Eight medical students used both the Arclight and the Heine ophthalmoscopes to examine the optic disc in 9 subjects. An EOU score was provided after every examination (a higher score indicating that the ophthalmoscope is easier to use). A consultant ophthalmologist provided the reference standard VCDR. Results. 288 examinations were performed. The number of examinations that yielded an estimation of the VCDR was significantly higher for the Arclight ophthalmoscope (125/144, 85%) compared to the Heine ophthalmoscope (88/144, 61%) (p < 0.001). The mean difference from the reference standard VCDR was similar for both instruments, with a mean of −0.078 (95% CI: −0.10 to −0.056) for the Arclight and −0.072 (95% CI: −0.097 to −0.046) for Heine (p = 0.69). The overall EOU score was significantly higher for the Arclight ophthalmoscope (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The Arclight ophthalmoscope performs as well as, and is easier to use than, a standard direct ophthalmoscope, suggesting it is a reliable, low-cost alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45896252015-10-11 The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope Lowe, James Cleland, Charles R. Mgaya, Evarista Furahini, Godfrey Gilbert, Clare E. Burton, Matthew J. Philippin, Heiko J Ophthalmol Research Article Background. The Arclight ophthalmoscope is a low-cost alternative to standard direct ophthalmoscopes. This study compared the Arclight ophthalmoscope with the Heine K180 direct ophthalmoscope to evaluate its reliability in assessing the vertical cup disc ratio (VCDR) and its ease of use (EOU). Methods. Eight medical students used both the Arclight and the Heine ophthalmoscopes to examine the optic disc in 9 subjects. An EOU score was provided after every examination (a higher score indicating that the ophthalmoscope is easier to use). A consultant ophthalmologist provided the reference standard VCDR. Results. 288 examinations were performed. The number of examinations that yielded an estimation of the VCDR was significantly higher for the Arclight ophthalmoscope (125/144, 85%) compared to the Heine ophthalmoscope (88/144, 61%) (p < 0.001). The mean difference from the reference standard VCDR was similar for both instruments, with a mean of −0.078 (95% CI: −0.10 to −0.056) for the Arclight and −0.072 (95% CI: −0.097 to −0.046) for Heine (p = 0.69). The overall EOU score was significantly higher for the Arclight ophthalmoscope (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The Arclight ophthalmoscope performs as well as, and is easier to use than, a standard direct ophthalmoscope, suggesting it is a reliable, low-cost alternative. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4589625/ /pubmed/26457197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743263 Text en Copyright © 2015 James Lowe et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lowe, James
Cleland, Charles R.
Mgaya, Evarista
Furahini, Godfrey
Gilbert, Clare E.
Burton, Matthew J.
Philippin, Heiko
The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope
title The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope
title_full The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope
title_fullStr The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope
title_full_unstemmed The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope
title_short The Arclight Ophthalmoscope: A Reliable Low-Cost Alternative to the Standard Direct Ophthalmoscope
title_sort arclight ophthalmoscope: a reliable low-cost alternative to the standard direct ophthalmoscope
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26457197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/743263
work_keys_str_mv AT lowejames thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT clelandcharlesr thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT mgayaevarista thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT furahinigodfrey thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT gilbertclaree thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT burtonmatthewj thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT philippinheiko thearclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT lowejames arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT clelandcharlesr arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT mgayaevarista arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT furahinigodfrey arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT gilbertclaree arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT burtonmatthewj arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope
AT philippinheiko arclightophthalmoscopeareliablelowcostalternativetothestandarddirectophthalmoscope