Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the displacement pattern and stress distribution during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with three different types of RME devices by constructing a finite element model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element model is constructed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singaraju, Gowri Sankar, Chembeti, Dhyanisree, Mandava, Prasad, Reddy, V Karunakar, Shetty, Sharath Kumar, George, Suja Ani
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435615
_version_ 1782392834109734912
author Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
Chembeti, Dhyanisree
Mandava, Prasad
Reddy, V Karunakar
Shetty, Sharath Kumar
George, Suja Ani
author_facet Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
Chembeti, Dhyanisree
Mandava, Prasad
Reddy, V Karunakar
Shetty, Sharath Kumar
George, Suja Ani
author_sort Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the displacement pattern and stress distribution during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with three different types of RME devices by constructing a finite element model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element model is constructed from the computerized tomography scans. According to the type of RME device, 3 groups were simulated on this mesh model. The experimental groups were as follows; Group I (tooth borne appliance), Group II (bone borne appliance), and Group III (hybrid appliance). A Le fort I osteotomy with bilateral pterygomaxillary disjunction and midpalatal split osteotomy cuts were incorporated in all the groups. The displacement pattern and stress distribution for each 1 mm of activation of appliance up to 10 mm is noted and analyzed. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test, Analysis of Variance and Duncan new multiple range test. RESULTS: Tooth borne appliance has more rotational tendencies. The bone borne and the hybrid appliance exhibited similar stress patterns for the dissipation of the forces produced by RME appliances. The pivoting effect decreased with the hybrid and the bone borne appliance and can be utilized in patient with hyper divergent growth. CONCLUSION: The pivoting effect is least with the hybrid appliances.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45897172015-11-01 A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study Singaraju, Gowri Sankar Chembeti, Dhyanisree Mandava, Prasad Reddy, V Karunakar Shetty, Sharath Kumar George, Suja Ani J Int Oral Health Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the displacement pattern and stress distribution during surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (RME) with three different types of RME devices by constructing a finite element model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A finite element model is constructed from the computerized tomography scans. According to the type of RME device, 3 groups were simulated on this mesh model. The experimental groups were as follows; Group I (tooth borne appliance), Group II (bone borne appliance), and Group III (hybrid appliance). A Le fort I osteotomy with bilateral pterygomaxillary disjunction and midpalatal split osteotomy cuts were incorporated in all the groups. The displacement pattern and stress distribution for each 1 mm of activation of appliance up to 10 mm is noted and analyzed. The data were analyzed using Student’s t-test, Analysis of Variance and Duncan new multiple range test. RESULTS: Tooth borne appliance has more rotational tendencies. The bone borne and the hybrid appliance exhibited similar stress patterns for the dissipation of the forces produced by RME appliances. The pivoting effect decreased with the hybrid and the bone borne appliance and can be utilized in patient with hyper divergent growth. CONCLUSION: The pivoting effect is least with the hybrid appliances. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4589717/ /pubmed/26435615 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Singaraju, Gowri Sankar
Chembeti, Dhyanisree
Mandava, Prasad
Reddy, V Karunakar
Shetty, Sharath Kumar
George, Suja Ani
A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study
title A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study
title_full A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study
title_short A Comparative Study of Three Types of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Devices in Surgically Assisted Maxillary Expansion: A Finite Element Study
title_sort comparative study of three types of rapid maxillary expansion devices in surgically assisted maxillary expansion: a finite element study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435615
work_keys_str_mv AT singarajugowrisankar acomparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT chembetidhyanisree acomparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT mandavaprasad acomparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT reddyvkarunakar acomparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT shettysharathkumar acomparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT georgesujaani acomparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT singarajugowrisankar comparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT chembetidhyanisree comparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT mandavaprasad comparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT reddyvkarunakar comparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT shettysharathkumar comparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy
AT georgesujaani comparativestudyofthreetypesofrapidmaxillaryexpansiondevicesinsurgicallyassistedmaxillaryexpansionafiniteelementstudy