Cargando…

Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluation and comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy among Class I, Class II division 1, and Class III subjects using Bolton’s analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pre-treatment casts were selected from the records of patients attending the Depa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prasanna, A Lakshmi, Venkatramana, V, Aryasri, A Srikanth, Katta, Anil Kumar, Santhanakrishnan, K, Maheshwari, Uma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435619
_version_ 1782392834993684480
author Prasanna, A Lakshmi
Venkatramana, V
Aryasri, A Srikanth
Katta, Anil Kumar
Santhanakrishnan, K
Maheshwari, Uma
author_facet Prasanna, A Lakshmi
Venkatramana, V
Aryasri, A Srikanth
Katta, Anil Kumar
Santhanakrishnan, K
Maheshwari, Uma
author_sort Prasanna, A Lakshmi
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluation and comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy among Class I, Class II division 1, and Class III subjects using Bolton’s analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pre-treatment casts were selected from the records of patients attending the Department of Orthodontics of Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Chennai. The sample consists of 180 pre-treatment casts with both sexes evenly distributed with 60 casts in each type of malocclusion, i.e., Class I, Class II div 1, and Class III malocclusion. The sample was selected according to angles classification. All patients were Indian nationals, between the age group of 12 to 20 years and Bolton’s analysis done on all the casts. RESULTS: Statistically no significant difference in all types of malocclusion except anterior Bolton’s discrepancy in Class III. CONCLUSION: Mean Bolton’s anterior ratio for angles Class III subjects was significantly greater than for Class I and Class II subjects. When Bolton’s overall ratio was compared there was no statistically significant difference among Class I, Class II div 1, and Class III malocclusions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45897212015-11-01 Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study Prasanna, A Lakshmi Venkatramana, V Aryasri, A Srikanth Katta, Anil Kumar Santhanakrishnan, K Maheshwari, Uma J Int Oral Health Original Research AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluation and comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy among Class I, Class II division 1, and Class III subjects using Bolton’s analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pre-treatment casts were selected from the records of patients attending the Department of Orthodontics of Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Chennai. The sample consists of 180 pre-treatment casts with both sexes evenly distributed with 60 casts in each type of malocclusion, i.e., Class I, Class II div 1, and Class III malocclusion. The sample was selected according to angles classification. All patients were Indian nationals, between the age group of 12 to 20 years and Bolton’s analysis done on all the casts. RESULTS: Statistically no significant difference in all types of malocclusion except anterior Bolton’s discrepancy in Class III. CONCLUSION: Mean Bolton’s anterior ratio for angles Class III subjects was significantly greater than for Class I and Class II subjects. When Bolton’s overall ratio was compared there was no statistically significant difference among Class I, Class II div 1, and Class III malocclusions. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4589721/ /pubmed/26435619 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Prasanna, A Lakshmi
Venkatramana, V
Aryasri, A Srikanth
Katta, Anil Kumar
Santhanakrishnan, K
Maheshwari, Uma
Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study
title Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study
title_full Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study
title_short Evaluation and Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancy among Class I, Class II Division 1, and Class III Subjects Using Bolton’s Analysis: An in vitro Study
title_sort evaluation and comparison of intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy among class i, class ii division 1, and class iii subjects using bolton’s analysis: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435619
work_keys_str_mv AT prasannaalakshmi evaluationandcomparisonofintermaxillarytoothsizediscrepancyamongclassiclassiidivision1andclassiiisubjectsusingboltonsanalysisaninvitrostudy
AT venkatramanav evaluationandcomparisonofintermaxillarytoothsizediscrepancyamongclassiclassiidivision1andclassiiisubjectsusingboltonsanalysisaninvitrostudy
AT aryasriasrikanth evaluationandcomparisonofintermaxillarytoothsizediscrepancyamongclassiclassiidivision1andclassiiisubjectsusingboltonsanalysisaninvitrostudy
AT kattaanilkumar evaluationandcomparisonofintermaxillarytoothsizediscrepancyamongclassiclassiidivision1andclassiiisubjectsusingboltonsanalysisaninvitrostudy
AT santhanakrishnank evaluationandcomparisonofintermaxillarytoothsizediscrepancyamongclassiclassiidivision1andclassiiisubjectsusingboltonsanalysisaninvitrostudy
AT maheshwariuma evaluationandcomparisonofintermaxillarytoothsizediscrepancyamongclassiclassiidivision1andclassiiisubjectsusingboltonsanalysisaninvitrostudy