Cargando…

Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits

BACKGROUND: Tooth crown dimensions vary between different ethnic groups, providing insights into the factors controlling human dental development. This present study compares permanent mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual crown dimensions between four ethnic groups, highlighting patterns of tooth size...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deepak, V, Goryawala, S N, Reddy, Yashwanth, Chhabra, R J, Nandaprasad, Shah, Nishit Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435624
_version_ 1782392836321181696
author Deepak, V
Goryawala, S N
Reddy, Yashwanth
Chhabra, R J
Nandaprasad,
Shah, Nishit Kumar
author_facet Deepak, V
Goryawala, S N
Reddy, Yashwanth
Chhabra, R J
Nandaprasad,
Shah, Nishit Kumar
author_sort Deepak, V
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tooth crown dimensions vary between different ethnic groups, providing insights into the factors controlling human dental development. This present study compares permanent mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual crown dimensions between four ethnic groups, highlighting patterns of tooth size between these groups and considers the findings in relation to genetic and environmental influences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MD and buccolingual tooth crown dimensions were recorded using digital vernier calipers on dental casts derived from four different human population: Iranians, Hindus, Muslims, and Christians. RESULTS: Obtained measurements were subjected to statistical analysis. The Christian sample was found to have the largest teeth overall, whereas the Iranian sample generally displayed the smallest MD and buccolingual crown dimensions (P < 0.001). Comparisons of coefficients of variation for teeth within each class showed that the later-forming teeth displayed greater variation in MD size than the earlier-forming teeth. CONCLUSION: The different patterns of tooth size observed between the study samples are thought to reflect differences in the relative contributions of genetic and environmental influences to dental development between the four population. Using a standardized methodology, significant differences in MD and buccolingual crown dimensions have been demonstrated between four human ethnic groups. There were also distinct differences in the patterns of crown size between the groups, with the later-forming teeth in each type generally showing greater size variation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589727
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45897272015-11-01 Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits Deepak, V Goryawala, S N Reddy, Yashwanth Chhabra, R J Nandaprasad, Shah, Nishit Kumar J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Tooth crown dimensions vary between different ethnic groups, providing insights into the factors controlling human dental development. This present study compares permanent mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual crown dimensions between four ethnic groups, highlighting patterns of tooth size between these groups and considers the findings in relation to genetic and environmental influences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MD and buccolingual tooth crown dimensions were recorded using digital vernier calipers on dental casts derived from four different human population: Iranians, Hindus, Muslims, and Christians. RESULTS: Obtained measurements were subjected to statistical analysis. The Christian sample was found to have the largest teeth overall, whereas the Iranian sample generally displayed the smallest MD and buccolingual crown dimensions (P < 0.001). Comparisons of coefficients of variation for teeth within each class showed that the later-forming teeth displayed greater variation in MD size than the earlier-forming teeth. CONCLUSION: The different patterns of tooth size observed between the study samples are thought to reflect differences in the relative contributions of genetic and environmental influences to dental development between the four population. Using a standardized methodology, significant differences in MD and buccolingual crown dimensions have been demonstrated between four human ethnic groups. There were also distinct differences in the patterns of crown size between the groups, with the later-forming teeth in each type generally showing greater size variation. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4589727/ /pubmed/26435624 Text en Copyright: © Journal of International Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Deepak, V
Goryawala, S N
Reddy, Yashwanth
Chhabra, R J
Nandaprasad,
Shah, Nishit Kumar
Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits
title Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits
title_full Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits
title_fullStr Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits
title_short Assessment of Ethnicity in Indian Population using Tooth Crown Metric Dental Traits
title_sort assessment of ethnicity in indian population using tooth crown metric dental traits
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589727/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26435624
work_keys_str_mv AT deepakv assessmentofethnicityinindianpopulationusingtoothcrownmetricdentaltraits
AT goryawalasn assessmentofethnicityinindianpopulationusingtoothcrownmetricdentaltraits
AT reddyyashwanth assessmentofethnicityinindianpopulationusingtoothcrownmetricdentaltraits
AT chhabrarj assessmentofethnicityinindianpopulationusingtoothcrownmetricdentaltraits
AT nandaprasad assessmentofethnicityinindianpopulationusingtoothcrownmetricdentaltraits
AT shahnishitkumar assessmentofethnicityinindianpopulationusingtoothcrownmetricdentaltraits