Cargando…
Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis recommends the transmission assessment survey (TAS) as the preferred methodology for determining whether mass drug administration can be stopped in an endemic area. Because of the limited experience available globally with the use of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1093-x |
_version_ | 1782392864972472320 |
---|---|
author | Dewi, Rita M. Tuti, Sekar Ganefa, Sitti Anwar, Chairiyah Larasati, Ria Ariyanti, Endah Herjati, Herty Brady, Molly |
author_facet | Dewi, Rita M. Tuti, Sekar Ganefa, Sitti Anwar, Chairiyah Larasati, Ria Ariyanti, Endah Herjati, Herty Brady, Molly |
author_sort | Dewi, Rita M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis recommends the transmission assessment survey (TAS) as the preferred methodology for determining whether mass drug administration can be stopped in an endemic area. Because of the limited experience available globally with the use of Brugia Rapid™ tests in conducting TAS in Brugia spp. areas, we explored the relationship between the antibody test results and Brugia spp. infection as detected by microfilaremia in different epidemiological settings. METHODS: The study analyzes the Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses and microfilaremia in all ages at three study sites in: i) a district which was classified as non-endemic, ii) a district which passed TAS, and iii) a district which failed TAS. Convenience sampling was done in each site, in one to three purposefully selected villages with a goal of 500 samples in each district. RESULTS: A total of 1543 samples were collected from residents in all three study sites. In the site which was classified as non-endemic and where MDA had not been conducted, 5 % of study participants were antibody positive, none was positive for microfilaremia, and age-specific antibody prevalence peaked at almost 8 % in the 25–34 year-old age range, with no antibody-positive results found in children under eight years of age. In the site that had passed TAS, 1 % of participants were antibody positive and none was positive for microfilaremia. In the site which failed TAS, 15 % of participants were antibody positive, 0.2 % were microfilaremic, and age-specific antibody prevalence was highest in 6–7 year olds (30 %), but above 8 % in all age levels above 8 years old. CONCLUSIONS: These results from districts which followed the current WHO guidance for mapping, MDA, and implementing TAS, while providing antibody profiles of treated and untreated populations under programmatic settings, support the choice of antibody prevalence in the 6- and 7-year-old age group in TAS for making stopping MDA decisions. Since only one study participant was microfilaremic, no conclusions could be drawn about the relationship between antibodies and microfilaremia and further longitudinal studies are required to understand this relationship. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4589901 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45899012015-10-02 Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program Dewi, Rita M. Tuti, Sekar Ganefa, Sitti Anwar, Chairiyah Larasati, Ria Ariyanti, Endah Herjati, Herty Brady, Molly Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis recommends the transmission assessment survey (TAS) as the preferred methodology for determining whether mass drug administration can be stopped in an endemic area. Because of the limited experience available globally with the use of Brugia Rapid™ tests in conducting TAS in Brugia spp. areas, we explored the relationship between the antibody test results and Brugia spp. infection as detected by microfilaremia in different epidemiological settings. METHODS: The study analyzes the Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses and microfilaremia in all ages at three study sites in: i) a district which was classified as non-endemic, ii) a district which passed TAS, and iii) a district which failed TAS. Convenience sampling was done in each site, in one to three purposefully selected villages with a goal of 500 samples in each district. RESULTS: A total of 1543 samples were collected from residents in all three study sites. In the site which was classified as non-endemic and where MDA had not been conducted, 5 % of study participants were antibody positive, none was positive for microfilaremia, and age-specific antibody prevalence peaked at almost 8 % in the 25–34 year-old age range, with no antibody-positive results found in children under eight years of age. In the site that had passed TAS, 1 % of participants were antibody positive and none was positive for microfilaremia. In the site which failed TAS, 15 % of participants were antibody positive, 0.2 % were microfilaremic, and age-specific antibody prevalence was highest in 6–7 year olds (30 %), but above 8 % in all age levels above 8 years old. CONCLUSIONS: These results from districts which followed the current WHO guidance for mapping, MDA, and implementing TAS, while providing antibody profiles of treated and untreated populations under programmatic settings, support the choice of antibody prevalence in the 6- and 7-year-old age group in TAS for making stopping MDA decisions. Since only one study participant was microfilaremic, no conclusions could be drawn about the relationship between antibodies and microfilaremia and further longitudinal studies are required to understand this relationship. BioMed Central 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4589901/ /pubmed/26427536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1093-x Text en © Dewi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dewi, Rita M. Tuti, Sekar Ganefa, Sitti Anwar, Chairiyah Larasati, Ria Ariyanti, Endah Herjati, Herty Brady, Molly Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
title | Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
title_full | Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
title_fullStr | Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
title_full_unstemmed | Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
title_short | Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
title_sort | brugia rapid™ antibody responses in communities of indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (tas) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589901/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1093-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewiritam brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT tutisekar brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT ganefasitti brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT anwarchairiyah brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT larasatiria brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT ariyantiendah brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT herjatiherty brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram AT bradymolly brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram |