Cargando…

Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program

BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis recommends the transmission assessment survey (TAS) as the preferred methodology for determining whether mass drug administration can be stopped in an endemic area. Because of the limited experience available globally with the use of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dewi, Rita M., Tuti, Sekar, Ganefa, Sitti, Anwar, Chairiyah, Larasati, Ria, Ariyanti, Endah, Herjati, Herty, Brady, Molly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1093-x
_version_ 1782392864972472320
author Dewi, Rita M.
Tuti, Sekar
Ganefa, Sitti
Anwar, Chairiyah
Larasati, Ria
Ariyanti, Endah
Herjati, Herty
Brady, Molly
author_facet Dewi, Rita M.
Tuti, Sekar
Ganefa, Sitti
Anwar, Chairiyah
Larasati, Ria
Ariyanti, Endah
Herjati, Herty
Brady, Molly
author_sort Dewi, Rita M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis recommends the transmission assessment survey (TAS) as the preferred methodology for determining whether mass drug administration can be stopped in an endemic area. Because of the limited experience available globally with the use of Brugia Rapid™ tests in conducting TAS in Brugia spp. areas, we explored the relationship between the antibody test results and Brugia spp. infection as detected by microfilaremia in different epidemiological settings. METHODS: The study analyzes the Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses and microfilaremia in all ages at three study sites in: i) a district which was classified as non-endemic, ii) a district which passed TAS, and iii) a district which failed TAS. Convenience sampling was done in each site, in one to three purposefully selected villages with a goal of 500 samples in each district. RESULTS: A total of 1543 samples were collected from residents in all three study sites. In the site which was classified as non-endemic and where MDA had not been conducted, 5 % of study participants were antibody positive, none was positive for microfilaremia, and age-specific antibody prevalence peaked at almost 8 % in the 25–34 year-old age range, with no antibody-positive results found in children under eight years of age. In the site that had passed TAS, 1 % of participants were antibody positive and none was positive for microfilaremia. In the site which failed TAS, 15 % of participants were antibody positive, 0.2 % were microfilaremic, and age-specific antibody prevalence was highest in 6–7 year olds (30 %), but above 8 % in all age levels above 8 years old. CONCLUSIONS: These results from districts which followed the current WHO guidance for mapping, MDA, and implementing TAS, while providing antibody profiles of treated and untreated populations under programmatic settings, support the choice of antibody prevalence in the 6- and 7-year-old age group in TAS for making stopping MDA decisions. Since only one study participant was microfilaremic, no conclusions could be drawn about the relationship between antibodies and microfilaremia and further longitudinal studies are required to understand this relationship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4589901
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45899012015-10-02 Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program Dewi, Rita M. Tuti, Sekar Ganefa, Sitti Anwar, Chairiyah Larasati, Ria Ariyanti, Endah Herjati, Herty Brady, Molly Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: The Global Programme to Eliminate Lymphatic Filariasis recommends the transmission assessment survey (TAS) as the preferred methodology for determining whether mass drug administration can be stopped in an endemic area. Because of the limited experience available globally with the use of Brugia Rapid™ tests in conducting TAS in Brugia spp. areas, we explored the relationship between the antibody test results and Brugia spp. infection as detected by microfilaremia in different epidemiological settings. METHODS: The study analyzes the Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses and microfilaremia in all ages at three study sites in: i) a district which was classified as non-endemic, ii) a district which passed TAS, and iii) a district which failed TAS. Convenience sampling was done in each site, in one to three purposefully selected villages with a goal of 500 samples in each district. RESULTS: A total of 1543 samples were collected from residents in all three study sites. In the site which was classified as non-endemic and where MDA had not been conducted, 5 % of study participants were antibody positive, none was positive for microfilaremia, and age-specific antibody prevalence peaked at almost 8 % in the 25–34 year-old age range, with no antibody-positive results found in children under eight years of age. In the site that had passed TAS, 1 % of participants were antibody positive and none was positive for microfilaremia. In the site which failed TAS, 15 % of participants were antibody positive, 0.2 % were microfilaremic, and age-specific antibody prevalence was highest in 6–7 year olds (30 %), but above 8 % in all age levels above 8 years old. CONCLUSIONS: These results from districts which followed the current WHO guidance for mapping, MDA, and implementing TAS, while providing antibody profiles of treated and untreated populations under programmatic settings, support the choice of antibody prevalence in the 6- and 7-year-old age group in TAS for making stopping MDA decisions. Since only one study participant was microfilaremic, no conclusions could be drawn about the relationship between antibodies and microfilaremia and further longitudinal studies are required to understand this relationship. BioMed Central 2015-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4589901/ /pubmed/26427536 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1093-x Text en © Dewi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Dewi, Rita M.
Tuti, Sekar
Ganefa, Sitti
Anwar, Chairiyah
Larasati, Ria
Ariyanti, Endah
Herjati, Herty
Brady, Molly
Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
title Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
title_full Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
title_fullStr Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
title_full_unstemmed Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
title_short Brugia Rapid™ antibody responses in communities of Indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (TAS) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
title_sort brugia rapid™ antibody responses in communities of indonesia in relation to the results of ‘transmission assessment surveys’ (tas) for the lymphatic filariasis elimination program
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589901/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26427536
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-1093-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dewiritam brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT tutisekar brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT ganefasitti brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT anwarchairiyah brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT larasatiria brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT ariyantiendah brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT herjatiherty brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram
AT bradymolly brugiarapidantibodyresponsesincommunitiesofindonesiainrelationtotheresultsoftransmissionassessmentsurveystasforthelymphaticfilariasiseliminationprogram