Cargando…
Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species
BACKGROUND: Phytoplasmas are bacterial plant pathogens (class Mollicutes), transmitted by phloem feeding leafhoppers, planthoppers and psyllids in a persistent/propagative manner. Transmission of phytoplasmas is under the control of behavioral, environmental and geographical factors, but molecular i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0522-5 |
_version_ | 1782392868350984192 |
---|---|
author | Rashidi, Mahnaz Galetto, Luciana Bosco, Domenico Bulgarelli, Andrea Vallino, Marta Veratti, Flavio Marzachì, Cristina |
author_facet | Rashidi, Mahnaz Galetto, Luciana Bosco, Domenico Bulgarelli, Andrea Vallino, Marta Veratti, Flavio Marzachì, Cristina |
author_sort | Rashidi, Mahnaz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Phytoplasmas are bacterial plant pathogens (class Mollicutes), transmitted by phloem feeding leafhoppers, planthoppers and psyllids in a persistent/propagative manner. Transmission of phytoplasmas is under the control of behavioral, environmental and geographical factors, but molecular interactions between membrane proteins of phytoplasma and vectors may also be involved. The aim of the work was to provide experimental evidence that in vivo interaction between phytoplasma antigenic membrane protein (Amp) and vector proteins has a role in the transmission process. In doing so, we also investigated the topology of the interaction at the gut epithelium and at the salivary glands, the two barriers encountered by the phytoplasma during vector colonization. METHODS: Experiments were performed on the ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ chrysanthemum yellows strain (CYP), and the two leafhopper vectors Macrosteles quadripunctulatus Kirschbaum and Euscelidius variegatus Kirschbaum. To specifically address the interaction of CYP Amp at the gut epithelium barrier, insects were artificially fed with media containing either the recombinant phytoplasma protein Amp, or the antibody (A416) or both, and transmission, acquisition and inoculation efficiencies were measured. An abdominal microinjection protocol was employed to specifically address the interaction of CYP Amp at the salivary gland barrier. Phytoplasma suspension was added with Amp or A416 or both, injected into healthy E. variegatus adults and then infection and inoculation efficiencies were measured. An internalization assay was developed, consisting of dissected salivary glands from healthy E. variegatus exposed to phytoplasma suspension alone or together with A416 antibody. The organs were then either observed in confocal microscopy or subjected to DNA extraction and phytoplasma quantification by qPCR, to visualize and quantify possible differences among treatments in localization/presence/number of CYP cells. RESULTS: Artificial feeding and abdominal microinjection protocols were developed to address the two barriers separately. The in vivo interactions between Amp of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ Chrysanthemum yellows strain (CYP) and vector proteins were studied by evaluating their effects on phytoplasma transmission by Euscelidius variegatus and Macrosteles quadripunctulatus leafhoppers. An internalization assay was developed, consisting of dissected salivary glands from healthy E. variegatus exposed to phytoplasma suspension alone or together with anti-Amp antibody. To visualize possible differences among treatments in localization/presence of CYP cells, the organs were observed in confocal microscopy. Pre-feeding of E. variegatus and M. quadripunctulatus on anti-Amp antibody resulted in a significant decrease of acquisition efficiencies in both species. Inoculation efficiency of microinjected E. variegatus with CYP suspension and anti-Amp antibody was significantly reduced compared to that of the control with phytoplasma suspension only. The possibility that this was due to reduced infection efficiency or antibody-mediated inhibition of phytoplasma multiplication was ruled out. These results provided the first indirect proof of the role of Amp in the transmission process. CONCLUSION: Protocols were developed to assess the in vivo role of the phytoplasma native major antigenic membrane protein in two phases of the vector transmission process: movement through the midgut epithelium and colonization of the salivary glands. These methods will be useful also to characterize other phytoplasma-vector combinations. Results indicated for the first time that native CYP Amp is involved in vivo in specific crossing of the gut epithelium and salivary gland colonization during early phases of vector infection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0522-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4589916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45899162015-10-02 Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species Rashidi, Mahnaz Galetto, Luciana Bosco, Domenico Bulgarelli, Andrea Vallino, Marta Veratti, Flavio Marzachì, Cristina BMC Microbiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Phytoplasmas are bacterial plant pathogens (class Mollicutes), transmitted by phloem feeding leafhoppers, planthoppers and psyllids in a persistent/propagative manner. Transmission of phytoplasmas is under the control of behavioral, environmental and geographical factors, but molecular interactions between membrane proteins of phytoplasma and vectors may also be involved. The aim of the work was to provide experimental evidence that in vivo interaction between phytoplasma antigenic membrane protein (Amp) and vector proteins has a role in the transmission process. In doing so, we also investigated the topology of the interaction at the gut epithelium and at the salivary glands, the two barriers encountered by the phytoplasma during vector colonization. METHODS: Experiments were performed on the ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ chrysanthemum yellows strain (CYP), and the two leafhopper vectors Macrosteles quadripunctulatus Kirschbaum and Euscelidius variegatus Kirschbaum. To specifically address the interaction of CYP Amp at the gut epithelium barrier, insects were artificially fed with media containing either the recombinant phytoplasma protein Amp, or the antibody (A416) or both, and transmission, acquisition and inoculation efficiencies were measured. An abdominal microinjection protocol was employed to specifically address the interaction of CYP Amp at the salivary gland barrier. Phytoplasma suspension was added with Amp or A416 or both, injected into healthy E. variegatus adults and then infection and inoculation efficiencies were measured. An internalization assay was developed, consisting of dissected salivary glands from healthy E. variegatus exposed to phytoplasma suspension alone or together with A416 antibody. The organs were then either observed in confocal microscopy or subjected to DNA extraction and phytoplasma quantification by qPCR, to visualize and quantify possible differences among treatments in localization/presence/number of CYP cells. RESULTS: Artificial feeding and abdominal microinjection protocols were developed to address the two barriers separately. The in vivo interactions between Amp of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’ Chrysanthemum yellows strain (CYP) and vector proteins were studied by evaluating their effects on phytoplasma transmission by Euscelidius variegatus and Macrosteles quadripunctulatus leafhoppers. An internalization assay was developed, consisting of dissected salivary glands from healthy E. variegatus exposed to phytoplasma suspension alone or together with anti-Amp antibody. To visualize possible differences among treatments in localization/presence of CYP cells, the organs were observed in confocal microscopy. Pre-feeding of E. variegatus and M. quadripunctulatus on anti-Amp antibody resulted in a significant decrease of acquisition efficiencies in both species. Inoculation efficiency of microinjected E. variegatus with CYP suspension and anti-Amp antibody was significantly reduced compared to that of the control with phytoplasma suspension only. The possibility that this was due to reduced infection efficiency or antibody-mediated inhibition of phytoplasma multiplication was ruled out. These results provided the first indirect proof of the role of Amp in the transmission process. CONCLUSION: Protocols were developed to assess the in vivo role of the phytoplasma native major antigenic membrane protein in two phases of the vector transmission process: movement through the midgut epithelium and colonization of the salivary glands. These methods will be useful also to characterize other phytoplasma-vector combinations. Results indicated for the first time that native CYP Amp is involved in vivo in specific crossing of the gut epithelium and salivary gland colonization during early phases of vector infection. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12866-015-0522-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4589916/ /pubmed/26424332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0522-5 Text en © Rashidi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Rashidi, Mahnaz Galetto, Luciana Bosco, Domenico Bulgarelli, Andrea Vallino, Marta Veratti, Flavio Marzachì, Cristina Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
title | Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
title_full | Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
title_fullStr | Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
title_full_unstemmed | Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
title_short | Role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
title_sort | role of the major antigenic membrane protein in phytoplasma transmission by two insect vector species |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4589916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26424332 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-015-0522-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rashidimahnaz roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies AT galettoluciana roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies AT boscodomenico roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies AT bulgarelliandrea roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies AT vallinomarta roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies AT verattiflavio roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies AT marzachicristina roleofthemajorantigenicmembraneproteininphytoplasmatransmissionbytwoinsectvectorspecies |